Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-25-2019
..... confessed. phurba lepcha (pw-4) is the husband of doma lepcha (pw-2) who supports this testimony.23) the argument that krishna kanta burman who translated the bengali version into nepali was not examined when the above mentioned first information report was lodged is wholly inconsequential. such first information report was only in respect of information of death. the investigating officer ..... the deceased netai mohanta and the informant on whose information the prosecution was set in motion. he stated that he does not know english, hindi page 6 of 16 or nepali and only knows bengali. he deposed that he had never met ranjit haldar earlier.13) before we examine respective contentions of the learned counsel for the parties, it would be ..... palzor bhutia (pw-15). he deposed that he availed the services of one krishna kanta burman for translating the contents of fir, lodged by bhola mohanta, from bengali language to nepali language. he visited the place of occurrence at the house belonging to one jamyang bhutia (pw-5) and prepared rough sketch map and also arranged to take photographs of the ..... was lodged by bhola mohanta (pw-1), brother of the deceased, on december 28, 2004. the original fir was lodged in bengali language (exh. 1), which was later translated in nepali language. bhola mohanta (pw-1) in his statement has stated that his brother had gone to rabom power house at lachung along with page 1 of 163) his family with .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-08-2019
..... confirmed that the raiding party had been constituted crl.a. 831/2014 page 2 of 10 consequent to receipt of secret information that one person, named deepak, who was a nepali national, would be approaching the indian oil petrol pump, near majnu ka tila, for supplying hashish (charas). he confirmed intercepting and overpowering the appellant (whom he recognised in court). he ..... imprisonment of 6 months. crl.a. 831/2014 page 1 of 10 2. the case of the prosecution, as upheld by the learned special judge, is that the appellant, a nepali national, was intercepted, on 23rd june, 2012, at about 11:45 am, and was found to be carrying 10 kg of hashish (charas), which constituted an offence under section 20 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-24-2019
..... candidate willing to be selected as a teacher in any school or madrasah, having bengali or english or hindi or nepali or oriya or santhali or telegu or urdu as the medium of instruction, must have bengali or english or hindi or nepali or oriya or santhali or telegu or urdu, as the case may be, as first or second or third .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-04-2019
..... hindi daily(m) 11/03/2019 11/03/2019 jaipur hindi daily(m) 11/03/2019 11/03/2019 gangtok english daily(m) 11/03/2019 11/03/2019 gangtok nepali daily(m) 11/03/2019 11/03/2019 chennai english daily(m) 11/03/2019 11/03/2019 sakshi hyderabad telugu daily(m) 11/03/2019 11/03/2019 allahabad .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-25-2019
..... he was working as a loader on 02.05.2010 and was sitting at the counter of the lufthansa airlines and a passenger, who looked like a chinese or a nepali, brought two pieces of baggage. he stated that he affixed a tag over the baggage brought by the passenger and kept it aside. he stated that thereafter, certain officers from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-28-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. 12.2018 Date of Decision :28.02.2019 + O.M.P. (COMM) 196/2018 & I.A. Nos.6150/2018, 9997-98/2018 NOBLE CHARTERING INC ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.V.K. Ramabhadran, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Jayesh Ashar, Mr.Bomi Patel, Mr.Dhaval Mehrotra and Mr.Sudhanshu Sikka, Advs. versus STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Santosh Kumar, Mr.Manav Gill and Ms.Bhabna Das, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 27.12.2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator in Case No.2 adjudicating the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to the Contract of Affreightment dated 27.07.2010 executed between the parties.2. The Sole Arbitrator by way of the Impugned Award, while rejecting the claims filed by the petitioner, has allowed the Counter Claim of the respondent for a sum of USD862500.00 with inte...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-28-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 225/2018 & IA71362018 Reserved on:20. 12.2018 Date of decision :28. 02.2019 STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Santosh Kumar, Mr.Sarthak Agarwal, Advs. versus NOBLE CHARTERING INC. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.V.K.Ramabhadran, Sr. Adv. with Mr.J.K.Asher, Mr.B.H.Patel, Mr.D.Mehrotra, Mr.Sudhanshu Sikka, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the Award dated 27.12.2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator.2. The parties entered into a Contract of Affreightment (hereinafter referred to as the COA) on 20.08.2008. The period of the contract was three years from September, 2008 to August, 2011. The Cargo quantity was specified as 18,00,000 MT of coking coal (5% more or less at petitioners option), with parcel size of 70,000 MT (5% more ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-21-2019
$~20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:21. t OCTOBER, 2019 + RSA1192019 & CM No.27753/2019 (stay) NABEEL AHMAD @ NABEED AHMAD ..... Appellant IQBAL Through: Mr. Zakir Raza, Adv. versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The appellant had concededly entered into an agreement of sale dated 17.01.2018 with the respondent respecting built up property described as measuring 31 square yards bearing khasra No.1/33, property No.368, Gali No.22, Chand Bagh, Brijpuri, Delhi -110094, the consideration having been settled at Rs. 20,20,000/-. Concededly again, at the time of execution of the said agreement of sale, the appellant had received from the respondent, an amount of Rs. 3,00,000/- as earnest money. Indisputably, no formal document transferring the right, title and interest in the said property came to be executed in the wake of the said transaction.2. The respondent had instituted civil suit (No.196/2018) on 21.04.2018 seeking re...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-20-2019
$~R-12-15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:2nd August,2019 Judgment pronounced on:20th September,2019 CRL.A. 1175/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1815/2018 RUNEET GULATHI ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms. Smriti Asmita and Mr.Sarthak Garg, Advs. versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS ..... Respondent with Maurya Enclave AND CRL.A. 1268/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) Nos.1997/2018, 536/2019 ..... Appellant ABHAY DEWAN alias GAPPY Through: Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah and Mr.Siddhant Kaushik, Advs. STATE versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS ..... Respondent with Maurya Enclave AND CRL.A. 27/2019 MAHIMA DEWAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms.Smriti Asmita and Mr.Sarthak Garg, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS with Maurya Enclave CRL.A. 1175/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 159 AND CRL.A. 60/...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-20-2019
$~R-12-15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:2nd August,2019 Judgment pronounced on:20th September,2019 CRL.A. 1175/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1815/2018 RUNEET GULATHI ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms. Smriti Asmita and Mr.Sarthak Garg, Advs. versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS ..... Respondent with Maurya Enclave AND CRL.A. 1268/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) Nos.1997/2018, 536/2019 ..... Appellant ABHAY DEWAN alias GAPPY Through: Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah and Mr.Siddhant Kaushik, Advs. STATE versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS ..... Respondent with Maurya Enclave AND CRL.A. 27/2019 MAHIMA DEWAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms.Smriti Asmita and Mr.Sarthak Garg, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State Insp. Madan Mohan, PS with Maurya Enclave CRL.A. 1175/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 159 AND CRL.A. 60/...
Tag this Judgment!