Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~1 & 5 * + CONT.CAS.(CRL) 10/2019 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS AMAN LOHIA & ORS. Through Mr.Jai A Dehadrai with Mr.Siddharth Arora for Aman Lohia. Mr. Joginder Tuli, with Ms. Joshini Tuli and Ms. Divya Jangid, Advocates for Respondent No.2 alongwith Respondent No.2 in person. + W.P.(CRL) 2375/2019 & Crl.M.A.Nos.34315-34316/2019, 34467/2019, 34924/2019 KIRAN LOHIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Ms. Rytim Vohra, Mr. Mayank Grover and Ms. Bhavna Bawa, Advocates alongwith Ms. Kiran Lohia in person. versus STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj with DSP Cont.Cas.(Crl.) 10/2019 & W.P.(Crl.) 2375/2019 Sangwan (I.O.) for UOI/CBI. Mr.Jai A Dehadrai with Mr.Siddharth Arora for Aman Lohia. Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ruchika Wadhawan, Ms. Vidushi Nishank and Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocates for Respondent No.5. Page 1 of 9...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~1 & 5 * + CONT.CAS.(CRL) 10/2019 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS AMAN LOHIA & ORS. Through Mr.Jai A Dehadrai with Mr.Siddharth Arora for Aman Lohia. Mr. Joginder Tuli, with Ms. Joshini Tuli and Ms. Divya Jangid, Advocates for Respondent No.2 alongwith Respondent No.2 in person. + W.P.(CRL) 2375/2019 & Crl.M.A.Nos.34315-34316/2019, 34467/2019, 34924/2019 KIRAN LOHIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Ms. Rytim Vohra, Mr. Mayank Grover and Ms. Bhavna Bawa, Advocates alongwith Ms. Kiran Lohia in person. versus STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj with DSP Cont.Cas.(Crl.) 10/2019 & W.P.(Crl.) 2375/2019 Sangwan (I.O.) for UOI/CBI. Mr.Jai A Dehadrai with Mr.Siddharth Arora for Aman Lohia. Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ruchika Wadhawan, Ms. Vidushi Nishank and Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocates for Respondent No.5. Page 1 of 9...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-30-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:24. h September, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:30. September, 2019 CRL.A. 257/2015 VIJAY KUMAR @ BABLOO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar STATE + CRL.A. 285/2015 ANOOP KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma and Mr.Aman Chaudhary, Advocates, Advocates + STATE versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar CRL.A. 649/2015 SANGEETA ..... Appellant STATE Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR Crl.A.257/2015 etc. Page 1 of 32 G.S.SISTANI, J.1. All the three appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 30....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-30-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:24. h September, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:30. September, 2019 CRL.A. 257/2015 VIJAY KUMAR @ BABLOO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar STATE + CRL.A. 285/2015 ANOOP KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma and Mr.Aman Chaudhary, Advocates, Advocates + STATE versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar CRL.A. 649/2015 SANGEETA ..... Appellant STATE Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR Crl.A.257/2015 etc. Page 1 of 32 G.S.SISTANI, J.1. All the three appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 30....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-30-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:24. h September, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:30. September, 2019 CRL.A. 257/2015 VIJAY KUMAR @ BABLOO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar STATE + CRL.A. 285/2015 ANOOP KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma and Mr.Aman Chaudhary, Advocates, Advocates + STATE versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar CRL.A. 649/2015 SANGEETA ..... Appellant STATE Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ..... Respondent State alongwith Insp.R.K.Maan and SI Dinesh, PS Ashok Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR Crl.A.257/2015 etc. Page 1 of 32 G.S.SISTANI, J.1. All the three appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 30....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-10-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 743/2019 SACHIN alias CHAJJA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr.Badar Mahmood, Mr.Atul Kumar Sharma and Mr.Aditya Raj, Advocates. versus $~ * + THE STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. Reserved on :19. h September, 2019 Date of Decision:10. h October, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant-convict challenging the judgment dated 05th March, 2019 and the order dated 08th March, 2019 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-03 (FTC), North-West, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.53529/2016 arising out of FIR No.617/2016 under Section 302 IPC and Sections Arms Act registered with Police Station Mangolpuri, whereby the appellant-convict had been convicted under Section 302 IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 30,000/- ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-02-2019
11 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 659/2019 THE STATE Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State ........ Petitioner versus with Insp., PS Jafrabad. GAURAV @ MOHIT & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. Date of Decision:02. d December, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) CRL. M.A. 41606/2019 (condonation of delay) Keeping in view the averments made in the application, the delay of nineteen days in filing the criminal leave petition is condoned. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. Crl.M.A. 41607/2019 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, present application stands disposed of. Page 1 of 7 CRL. L.P. 659/2019 CRL.L.P. 659/2019 1. Present criminal leave petition has been filed on behalf of the State challenging the judgment dated 9th August, 2019 passed by Additional Sessions Judge05 (Shahdara District), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi acquitting the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-07-2019
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2530 OF2012Birla Institute of Technology .Appellant(s) VERSUS The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 02.04.2008 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in LPA No.53 of 2007 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the LPA filed by the appellant herein and confirmed the order dated 12.01.2007 passed by the Single Judge of the High Court in W.P. No.2572 of 2005. 1 2. The controversy involved in this appeal is a short one as would be clear from the facts stated infra.3. The appellant is a premier technical educational institute of repute in the country. It is known as Birla Institute of Technology (BIT).4. Respondent No.4 joined the appellantInstitute as Assistant Professor on 16.09.1971 and superannuated on 30.11.2001 after attaining the age of superannuation.5. Respondent No....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-17-2019
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.576 OF2016INDIAN HOTEL AND RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION (AHAR) & ANR. .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S) W I T H WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.24 OF2017A N D WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.119 OF2017JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.This batch of three Writ Petitions was heard together and is being disposed of by this Common Judgment as similar issues and prayers are raised in all these petitions.2) The instant writ petitions have been preferred under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, challenging certain provisions of the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels, Restaurant and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women (Working therein) Act, 2016 (hereinafter 2 referred to as the Act) and also the Rules framed there under being the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels, Restaurant and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women (Working therein)...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-18-2019
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.4763-4764 OF2013TAMIL NADU POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STERLITE INDUSTRIES (I) LTD. & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 8773-8774 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9542-9543 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL No.5782 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1552-1554 OF2019CIVIL APPEAL No.23 OF2019CIVIL APPEAL No.1582 OF2019JUDGMENT R.F. NARIMAN, J.1. The present appeals arise out of orders that have been passed by the National Green Tribunal [NGT]. dated 31.05.2013, 08.08.2013, 1 and 15.12.2018. The brief facts necessary to appreciate the controversy raised in the present case are as follows.2. The respondent, Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. / Vedanta Ltd., was operating a copper smelter plant at the State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Ltd. (SIPCOT) Industrial Complex at Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu. On 01.08.1994, the respondent received a No-Objection Certificate [NOC]. from the Tamil Nadu Pollution C...
Tag this Judgment!