Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-09-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on 31.1.2019 Judgment Pronounced on 09.08.2019 EX.P. 99/2015 GLENCORE INTERNATIONAL AG ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr. Nakul Dewan with Mr. Moazzam Khan, Ms. Shweta Sahu, Mr. Brijesh Kumar, and Mr. Kartik Prasad, Advs. versus INDIAN POTASH LIMITED & ANR. ..... Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Arjun Singh Bhati, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: Preface 1. The captioned execution petition seeks enforcement of foreign award dated 12.3.2012 (hereafter referred to as Final Award) and the cost of the reference awarded in favour of the decree holder i.e. Glencore International AG. (hereafter referred to as Glencore) which was passed by the arbitral tribunal after the final award on 12.5.2015 (hereafter referred to as Cost Award).2. Notice in the execution petition was issued on 23.3.2015. The judgment debtor i.e. India Potash Ltd. (hereafter referred to as IPL) entered appearance through its cou...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-09-2019
$~42 & 43 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 402/2019, I.A. 10589/2019 BATA INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Adv. versus AVS INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 201/2019 Through: Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Adv. ..... Respondent BATA INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Adv. versus AVS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % SANJEEV NARULA, J.ORDER0908.2019 Through: Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS ARB.P. 402/2019 1. By way of the present petition under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the A&C Act), the... Petitioner prays that the parties be referred to arbitration under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties. ARB.P. 402/2019 & O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 201/2019 Page 1 of 24 Brief Facts:2.... Petitioner (BATA India Ltd.), is a company manufacturing footwear. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-09-2019
$~42 & 43 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 402/2019, I.A. 10589/2019 BATA INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Adv. versus AVS INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 201/2019 Through: Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Adv. ..... Respondent BATA INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Adv. versus AVS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % SANJEEV NARULA, J.ORDER0908.2019 Through: Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS ARB.P. 402/2019 1. By way of the present petition under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the A&C Act), the... Petitioner prays that the parties be referred to arbitration under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties. ARB.P. 402/2019 & O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 201/2019 Page 1 of 24 Brief Facts:2.... Petitioner (BATA India Ltd.), is a company manufacturing footwear. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-25-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4261/2019 and CRL.M.A. 34533/2019 M/S. DAYA ENGINEERING WORKS (SLEEPER) LTD. & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Akash Chatterjee, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR. Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Spl. PP, CBI ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.RCBD1/2016/E/0012, registered at Police Station CBI, BS & FC for the offences punishable under sections 120-B/420/467/468/471 IPC along with the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom.2. The gist of the allegation in the FIR registered is that M/S Daya Sugar a unit of M/s Daya Engineering Works (sleeper) Ltd., through its Directors, in conspiracy with unknown accused bank officials and private persons cheated the consortium of banks to the tune of Rs.5261.63 Lacs. CRL.M.C.4261/2019 Pa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-14-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h October, 2019 CS(COMM) 89/2019, IAs No.2499/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 9149/2019 (u/OVII R-11 CPC) SATISH KUMAR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Lokesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. Versus KHUSHBOO SINGH & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Adv. with Mr. P.S. Rana & Ms. Disha Passi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff Satish Kumar has instituted this suit against (a) Khushboo Singh; (b) Abhishek Chauhan; and (c) Aarya Fashion through its proprietor Khushboo Singh, for (i) permanent injunction in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants, thereby restraining the defendants and their agents, servants, relatives, associates, attorney, etc. from logging in, accessing and using the official email ids of the plaintiff including [email protected] [email protected] and further disseminating, reproducing, uploading, publishing, circulating, broadcasting, distributing...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-01-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t November, 2019. CS(COMM) 699/2018, IA No.3814/2017(u/O.XXXIX R-2A CPC) & IA No.5770/2019(u/O.III R-4(2) CPC) MEHRA COSMETICS ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Mohan Vidhani with Mr. Rahul Vidhani, Mr. Ashish Singh, Ms. Elisha Kumar & Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Advs. Versus RAM KUMAR GULATI & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Saurav Rajan Chauhan with Mr. Akshay Srivastava & Ms. Pratibha, Advs. along with D-1&2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW The plaintiff instituted the suit against the four defendants, namely (a) 1. Ram Kumar Gulati; (b) Raj Kumar Gulati; (c) D.K.Cosmetics; and, (d) G.M. Plastics, for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from (a) infringing the trade mark BLUE CLIFF of the plaintiff by adopting the mark BLUE CHEF with respect to the same goods; (b) passing off their goods as that of the plaintiff under the mark BLUE CHIEF, by use of the mark BLUE CHEF; (c) infringement of registered desi...
Tag this Judgment!