Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-07-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8791/2018 & CM APPLs. 52194-95/2018 MASTER SINGHAM (THROUGH NATURAL GUARDIAN) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv. with Mr. Mohit Mudgal and Ms.Akansha Sharma, Advs. versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ANR ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P.S. Sudheer, Adv. with Mrs. A. Mathew and Mr. Bharat Sood, Adv. for R-2 Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC for GNCTD with Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee and Ms. Shivani Vij, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT % 1. Master Singham is an 8-year old boy. He was granted admission, in the Sanskriti School (hereinafter referred to as the School) in 2013, under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category. Three years later, his admission was ignominiously cancelled, by the Directorate of Education (DoE), vide under Section 24(3) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the DSE Act) read with c...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-31-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:31. t January, 2019 W.P.(C) 9883/2018, CM No.38508/2018 CUSHMAN AND WAKEFIELD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with ........ Petitioner Mr. Karan Malhotra, Mr. Vikram Bajaj, Mr. Rahul Raj, Mr. Chandra Thampi and Mr. Kapil Seth, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: Ms. Madhavi Divan, ASG with Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Nidhi Khanna and Ms. Aditya Goyal, Advs. for UOI AND + W.P.(C) 9889/2018, CM No.38522/2018 KNIGHT FRANK (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with ........ Petitioner Mr. Karan Malhotra, Mr. Vikram Bajaj, Mr. Rahul Raj, Mr. Chandra Thampi and Mr. Kapil Seth, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Ms. Madhavi Divan, ASG with ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Nidhi Khanna and Ms. Aditya Goyal, Advs. for UOI AND + W.P.(C) 9890/2018, CM No.38524/2018 CBRE SOUTH ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-14-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. 01.2019 Date of Decision :14. 03.2019 O.M.P. (COMM) 128/2018 & I.A. No.3857/2018 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Keshav Mohan, Mr.Rishi K.Awasthi and Ms.Ritu Arora, Advs. versus + PUNE SHOLAPUR ROAD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Kaushik Laik, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 30.11.2017 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Concession Agreement dated 30.09.2009 executed between the parties for the work of Design, Engineering, Construction, Development, Finance, Operation and Maintenance of 4 laning of Pune Solapur Section of NH 9 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-26-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h March, 2019 Decided on:26. h March, 2019 DASHRATH LAL (DECEASED) THR. LRs LPA942016 .....Appellants Through: Mr.Kamal Mehta, Advocate. versus DVB (NOW BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD.) & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr.Sandeep Prabhakar with Mr.Vikas Mehta, Advocates for R1. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal by the legal representatives (LRs) (Appellants 2 to4) of late JUDGMENT Shri Dashrath Lal (Appellant No.1) and three others (Appellants 5 to7) is directed against the order dated 17th November 2015 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing WP(C) 4093 of 2000.2. The challenge in the writ petition was to an order dated 8th March 2000 passed by the Delhi Vidyut Board (DVB), the predecessor-in-interest of the Respondent No.1 BSES Rajdhani Power Limited (BRPL) dismissing Appellant No.1 and three other employees (Appellants 5 to7) from service. The challenge was also to the order ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-30-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(CRL) 743/2019 & Crl.M.A. 5412/2019 (stay) Decided on:30. h April, 2019 ANKUR NARANG ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Hitender Kapur, Adv. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Babbar, Adv. with SI Yogender PS Paschim Vihar. Mr. Kamal Gupta, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.38/2019 under Sections 498A/4IPC registered at PS Paschim Vihar on the complaint of respondent No.2.2. The three grounds taken by the petitioner seeking quashing of FIR in question are; first is lack of territorial jurisdiction contending that no offence has taken place in Delhi and thus Police Station has no jurisdiction to investigate and the Trial Court has no jurisdiction to try the offence; secondly, that the FIR was not lodged within the period of limitation and thirdly that on the face of the FIR the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jun-06-2019
$~ * + + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 660/2017 SIKODH MAHTO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.B.Dandapani, Adv. STATE CRL.A. 698/2017 versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with ASI Yashin Khan, PS Crime Branch PRABHU MAHTO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jivesh Kr. Tiwari, Adv. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with ASI Yashin Khan, PS Crime Branch CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT6h June, 2019 Vide judgment dated 26th April, 2017, the learned Additional Sessions Judge (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ) has convicted the appellants under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to CRL.A. 660/2017 & CRL.A. 698/2017 Page 1 of 40 as the NDPS Act). As a consequence, vide separate order dated 29th April, 2017, the learned ASJ has sentenced each appellant to 10 years rigorous imprisonment (RI) and fine of 1 lakh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jun-06-2019
$~ * + + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 660/2017 SIKODH MAHTO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.B.Dandapani, Adv. STATE CRL.A. 698/2017 versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with ASI Yashin Khan, PS Crime Branch PRABHU MAHTO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jivesh Kr. Tiwari, Adv. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with ASI Yashin Khan, PS Crime Branch CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT6h June, 2019 Vide judgment dated 26th April, 2017, the learned Additional Sessions Judge (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ) has convicted the appellants under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to CRL.A. 660/2017 & CRL.A. 698/2017 Page 1 of 40 as the NDPS Act). As a consequence, vide separate order dated 29th April, 2017, the learned ASJ has sentenced each appellant to 10 years rigorous imprisonment (RI) and fine of 1 lakh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-08-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 492/2017 DHANESH THE STATE CRL.A. 628/2017 VIKRANT Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, ..... Appellant with Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Ms. Trishita Prasar and Mr. Nirvikar Singh, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri WITH Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, ..... Appellant THE STATE with Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Ms. Trishita Prasar and Mr. Nirvikar Singh, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri AND + CRL.A. 451/2018 KAILASH CHAND ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Tomar, Advocate versus Page 1 of 53 Crl.A.No.492/2017 & Ors. STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri. % Date of Decision:08. h July, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANG...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-08-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 492/2017 DHANESH THE STATE CRL.A. 628/2017 VIKRANT Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, ..... Appellant with Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Ms. Trishita Prasar and Mr. Nirvikar Singh, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri WITH Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, ..... Appellant THE STATE with Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Ms. Trishita Prasar and Mr. Nirvikar Singh, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri AND + CRL.A. 451/2018 KAILASH CHAND ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Tomar, Advocate versus Page 1 of 53 Crl.A.No.492/2017 & Ors. STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri. % Date of Decision:08. h July, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANG...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-08-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 492/2017 DHANESH THE STATE CRL.A. 628/2017 VIKRANT Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, ..... Appellant with Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Ms. Trishita Prasar and Mr. Nirvikar Singh, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri WITH Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, ..... Appellant THE STATE with Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Ms. Trishita Prasar and Mr. Nirvikar Singh, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri AND + CRL.A. 451/2018 KAILASH CHAND ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Tomar, Advocate versus Page 1 of 53 Crl.A.No.492/2017 & Ors. STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri. % Date of Decision:08. h July, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANG...
Tag this Judgment!