Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-31-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1117/2018 SANDEEP STATE Through Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Through Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Inspector Radhey Shyam, PS Narela ATO. Reserved on :15. h October, 2019 Date of Decision:31. t October, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant-convict challenging the judgment dated 21st August, 2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Special Fast Track Court, Rohini, Delhi in Sessions Case No.115/2013 arising out of FIR No.337/2009 registered with Police Station Narela convicting him under Sections 201, 302, 342 and 120B IPC and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 25,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 120B, imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 50,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 120B IPC, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-05-2019
+ W.P.(C) 13901/2018 ANJU BALA Reserved on:06. 09.2019 Pronounced on:05. 11.2019 ........ Petitioner $~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through Mr.A.K. Bhardwaj, Adv. with Ms.Jagriti Singh, Adv. versus GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.V.K. Garg, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Noopur Dubey & Mr.Amit Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to quash and set aside the impugned memorandum No.CO/HR/Disc./D- 142/2016 dated 02.08.2016, inquiry report dated 28.03.2017, orders dated 31.05.2017, 23.08.2017, 11.04.2018 and 06.12.2018.2. Further seeks direction thereby directing the respondents to re-instate the petitioner back in service with all consequential benefits. W.P.(C) 13901/2018 Page 1 of 44 3. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner joined the respondent company as Management Trainee (E-1) w.e.f. 01.06.2002. She got promotions as Senior Officer in E-2 Grade, Dy...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-20-2019
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 R BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.9033/2018 C/W WRIT PETITON NO.9034/2018 C/W WRIT PETITION NO.57934/2018 (GM CPC) IN W.P.NO.9033/2018: BETWEEN MR A ASHRAF ALI S/O LATE B.R.ABDULLAH, AGED ABOUT50YEARS, R/AT CITY LINES, NO.15, GROUND FLOOR, COOPER ARCH, NO.83, INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE-01. (BY SRI PRASANNA KUMAR C S, ADV.) AND SMT B S SUSHEELA DEVI W/O LATE DR.BJS ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT91YEARS, R/AT NO.24, 2ND MAIN ROAD, TATA SILK FARM EXTENSION, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE-560 004. ...PETITIONER RESPONDENT (BY SMT SUNITHA H SINGH, ADV.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED0201.2018 PASSED ON I.A.NO.8 IN O.S.NO.5539/2013, PENDING ON THE FILE OF V ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH13, BANGALORE, VIDE ANNEXURE-A. 2 IN W.P. NO.9034/2018:BETWEEN : M/S BRIGADE PROPERTIES HAVING OFF.NO.19, NALPAD CH...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-25-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS.(CRL) 10/2019 & CRL.M.A. 38135/2019 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION Through ........ Petitioner versus $~6 & 7 * + AMAN LOHIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Ms. Rytim Vohra, Ms. Akriti Tyagi, Mr. Sanjeevi Seshadri and Ms. Niharika Kaul, Advocates with Ms. Kiran Lohia in person. Ms. Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Altamish Siddiki and Mr. Rajat Bhalla, Advocates for respondent No.1- Aman Lohia. Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma and Ms. Ruchika Wadhawan, Advocates for Ajey Lohia. Ms. Joshini Tuli, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Spl. PP for UOI/CBI. + W.P.(CRL) 2375/2019 & CRL.M.As. 34316/2019, 34467/2019, WITH375572019, 38136/2019 AND392302017 KIRAN LOHIA Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Ms. Rytim ........ Petitioner CONT.CAS.(CRL) 10/2019 & W.P.(Crl.) 237...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-25-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS.(CRL) 10/2019 & CRL.M.A. 38135/2019 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION Through ........ Petitioner versus $~6 & 7 * + AMAN LOHIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Ms. Rytim Vohra, Ms. Akriti Tyagi, Mr. Sanjeevi Seshadri and Ms. Niharika Kaul, Advocates with Ms. Kiran Lohia in person. Ms. Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Altamish Siddiki and Mr. Rajat Bhalla, Advocates for respondent No.1- Aman Lohia. Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma and Ms. Ruchika Wadhawan, Advocates for Ajey Lohia. Ms. Joshini Tuli, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Spl. PP for UOI/CBI. + W.P.(CRL) 2375/2019 & CRL.M.As. 34316/2019, 34467/2019, WITH375572019, 38136/2019 AND392302017 KIRAN LOHIA Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Ms. Rytim ........ Petitioner CONT.CAS.(CRL) 10/2019 & W.P.(Crl.) 237...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-27-2019
$~52 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C.6034/2019 Date of decision:27. 11.2019 AKASH SIRMANE PARIYAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Ahmad Waseem, Adv. with petitioner in person versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI Nassu Ahmad, PS Shaheen Bagh Mr. Srikant Mishra, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 41232/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6034/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.90/2019, dated 14.05.2019 registered at Police Station Shaheen Bagh, for the offence punishable under Section 135 of The Electricity Act, 2003 and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom. CRL.M.C. 6034/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-29-2019
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R ON THE29H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2066 OF2016BETWEEN : IMRAN JALAL @ BILAL AHMED @ KOTA @ SALEEM @ HADI, SON OF SHAMSHUDDIN, AGED ABOUT44YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.16, SADARBAI, HAZARATHBAL, SRINAGAR, JAMMU AND KASHMIR, INDIA. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT No.262/51, RANIPET, HOSPET, BELLARY, KARNATAKA. (BY SRI. S. BALAKRISHNAN, ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH (H & B) POLICE, N.T.PET, BENGALURU. (BY SRI. V.M. SHEELVANTH, STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR)... RESPONDENT... APPELLANT2THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION3742) CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION OF SENTENCE DATED0410.2016 AND0510.2016 PASSED BY THE55H ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-56), BENGALURU CITY IN S.C. NO.1031/2008 CONVICTING THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUN...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-11-2019
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE11H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH RFA.No.1091/2007(MON) S/O LATE SRI G.S. GUPTA, AGED ABOUT64YEARS, No.5 & 6, MILLIA BUILDING, N.R. ROAD, 2ND CROSS, BANGALORE-560 002.BETWEEN : SMT. SHAKUNTALA GUPTA, W/O D.P. GUPTA, AGED ABOUT53YEARS, No.5 AND6 MILLIA BUILDING, N.R. ROAD, 2ND CROSS, BANGALORE-560 002. SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY LRs. 1(a) D.P. GUPTA @ DEV PRAKASH GUPTA, 1(b) VIJAY PRAKASH GUPTA, 1(c) RAVI PRAKASH GUPTA, 1(d) SMT. MADHU GUPTA, W/O ASHISH BANSAL, S/O D.P. GUPTA @ DEV PRAKASH GUPTA, AGED ABOUT41YEARS, #59/1, 3RD FLOOR, 1ST N BLOCK RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 010. S/O D.P. GUPTA @ DEV PRAKASH GUPTA, AGED ABOUT39YEARS, #320, SOUTH HARRISON STREET, NEW JERSY. 2 AGED ABOUT35YEARS, #F-277, 2ND FLOOR, MANSAROVER GARDEN, NEW DELHI-15.... APPELLANTS (BY SRI SUHAS P., ADVOCATE FOR SRI S. BHASKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR RAVI & RAVI ADVOCATES FOR LRs OF APPELLANT) AND: MR. KIRAN BHARTIA, S/O LAT...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-14-2019
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL/CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Review Petition (Crl.) No.46 of 2019 IN Writ Petition (Crl.) No.298 of 2018 YASHWANT SINHA & ORS. .Petitioners Versus .Respondents INTERVENTION APPLICATION, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Through its DIRECTOR & ANR. (I.A. No.69008/2019 CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION, I.A. No.69006/2019 I.A. No.71047/2019 PRODUCTION OF RECORDS and I.A. No.69009/2019 STAY APPLICATION) WITH MA582019 in W.P.(Crl.) No.225/2018 (PIL-W) (I.A. No.182576/2018 CORRECTION OF MISTAKES IN THE JUDGMENT) R.P.(Crl.) No.122/2019 in W.P.(Crl.) No.297/2018 (PIL-W) 1 No.29248/2019 CRIMINAL INITIATING MA4032019 in W.P.(Crl.) No.298/2018 (PIL-W) (I.A. PROCEEDINGS U/S340OF CRPC) R.P.(C) No.719/2019 in W.P.(C) No.1205/2018 (PIL-W) CONMT.PET.(Crl.) No.3/2019 in R.P.(Crl.) No.46/2019 in W.P.(Crl.) No.298/2018 (PIL-W) (I.A. No.63168/2019 EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., I.A. No.71678/2019 EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and I.A. No.66253/2019 EXEMPTION FROM F...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-10-2019
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3934 OF2017RAM PARSHOTAM MITTAL & ORS. APPELLANTS VERSUS HOTEL QUEEN ROAD PVT. LTD. & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3935 OF2017JUDGMENT ARUN MISHRA, J.1. The appeal arises out of the judgment dated 31.5.2013 passed by the High Court of Delhi, setting aside an order dated 31.1.2006 passed by the Company Law Board in Company Petition No.64/2005.2. The backdrop facts indicate that the Government of India took a policy decision on 5.7.2002 to disinvest its shares in the Indian Tourism Development Corporation (in short, the ITDC) which owns various hotel properties; one of them being Indraprastha Hotel, formerly known as Hotel Ashok Yatri Niwas, (hereinafter referred to as the hotel).3. In terms of an approved scheme of Arrangement of Demerger the hotel was transferred to the Respondent No.1 Hotel Queen Road Pvt. 2 Ltd. (in short, HQRL) which was created as a Special Purpose Vehicle to enable ...
Tag this Judgment!