Court : Chennai
Decided on : Nov-05-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :05. 11.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.S.RAVI Crl.A.(MD)No.206 of 2013 and MP(MD)No.1 of 2014 Karuppasamy .. Appellant/1st Accused Vs. State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Rajapalayam South Police Station, Virudhunagar District. Crime No.140 of 2007. .. Respondent/Complainant Criminal appeal filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. against the conviction and sentence dated 14.06.2013 passed in Sessions Case No.95 of 2009 by the Principal District and Sessions Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur. For Appellant : Mr.M.Daniel Manoharan For Respondent : Mr.C.Ramesh Addl.Public Prosecutor Judgment reserved on 28.10.2014 Judgment delivered on 05.11.2014 :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by A.SELVAM, J.) Challenge in this Criminal Appeal is to the conviction and sentence dated 14th June, 2013 passed in Sessions Case No.95 of 2009 by the Principal District and Sessions Court,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Aug-18-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD)No.13475 of 2014 O.T.Kombu Maharaja ..Petitioner versus 1.The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Secretary, Public Works Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 3.The Chief Engineer, (General).Public Works Department, Cheapuck, Chennai-5. 4.The District Collector, Tuticorin. Tuticorin District. 5.The Chief Engineer, P.W.D.- Irrigation, Vaigai Illam, Madurai Region, Madurai. 6.The Superintending Engineer, P.W.D ?. Irrigation, Thamiraparani River Basin, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District. 7.The Executive Engineer, & Public Information Officer, P.W.D., Korampallam River Basin, Tuticorin District. 8.The Divisional Engineer, Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari. 9.Seik Oliyudeen 10.Vijayaraj 11.Somasundaram 12.Vinkataraman 13.The Director, Director of Vigilance and Anti-corruption, Chennai -28..Respond...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Sep-16-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:16. 09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.9685 of 2014 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 A.Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary to the State Government, Health Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Director, Directorate of Medical Education, Chennai. 3.The Dean, Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.02.2014 and take appropriate steps by conducting a detailed enquiry and conduct an Auditing for the salary given to all the Nursing Staffs working in the Government Rajaji Hospital and regularise the Nursing Service. !For Petitioner ... Mr.K.Sudalaiyandi ^For Respondents ... Mr.M.Govindan, Special Govt.Pleader * * * * * :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J) This...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Aug-22-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.R.P.(MD)No.887 of 2014 & M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2014 S.Sankara Subramanian .Petitioner versus 1.Dr.S.Krishnaswamy 2.S.Ramaiah 3.S.Pitchaiah 4.S.Thirukooda Rajappan 5.S.Guhan .Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the petition and order, dated 12.12.2013, made in I.A.No.149 of 2007 in O.S.No.31 of 1985, on the file of Sub-Court, Tenkasi. !For Petitioner :Mr.S.Palani Velayutham ^For Respondent No.1 :Mr.M.Ashok Kumar For Respondent Nos.2, 3 & 5 : Mr.N.Rajachandrasekaran For Respondent No.4 : Dispensed with :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the petition and order, dated 12.12.2013, made in I.A.No.149 of 2007 in O.S.No.31 of 1985, on the file of Sub-Court, Tenkasi. 2.The revision petitioner herein is the third defendant, whereas the fiRs.respondent is the plaintiff and the respondents 2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-05-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CRIMIAL APPEAL No.1575 of 2009 05-03-2014 Shaik Riyaz....APPELLANT State of Andhra Pradesh....RESPONDENT COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT:- Smt.K.Lalitha COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:- Public Prosecutor : ?.Cases Referred: HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1575 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The sole accused in S.C.No.91 of 2007 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, Hindupur was tried for the offence of committing murder of one Sr.Harijana Narasaiah at Hindupur on 01.09.2006. Through its judgment, dated 21.04.2008, the trial Court convicted the accused for the said offence and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and imposed fine of Rs.500/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for one month. The Station House Officer, Hindupur received Ex.P1, complaint, submitted by P.W.1, the wife of the deceased, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-28-2014
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.450 OF201328-02-2014 J.P.Rao ...Petitioner The Union of India, rep., by its Secretary,Home Department, New Delhi & others...Respondents Counsel for Petitioner : Party-in-person Counsel for respondent Nos.1-3:Sri Ponnam Ashok Gourd Assistant Solicitor General Counsel for respondent Nos.4 &5:Government Pleader for GAD HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1.AIR201413 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.450 of 2013 Date:28. 02.2014 This Court made the following: ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) The above public interest litigation has been filed by the petitioner a practicing advocate of this Court praying for the following reliefs: ".(A) Declare the action of the 1st responde...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jun-23-2014
HONBLE SRI JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WRIT PETITION Nos.6470 of 2006 23-06-2014 Kondamudi Chandrasekhara Rao..... PETITIONER State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Vijayawada, rep. By its Assistant General Manager nd others .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner:Sri Challa Ajay Kumar Counsel for respondents : Sri P.Vishnuvardhan Reddy Dr. Y.Padmavathi : ?.Cases referred:1. 1987(4) SCC6912. AIR1966SC16723. 1993(1) SCC714. 2002(3) LLJ2095. AIR1991SC1016. AIR1986SC9547. (1993) 1 SCC718. (1995) 2 SCC3269. 1998(7) SCC6610. 1997(7) SCC59211. 1993(3) SCC25912. AIR1995SC92213. AIR1991SC10114. 1979 (2) ALT41115. 1981 SCC125316. 2004(1) LLJ19017. 1991(2) SCC59918. 1992(2) SCC2919. 1995 Supp. (4) SCC11120. 2004(1) LLJ (Feb) 227 21. 1992(4) SCC11822. 2001(1) LLJ59623. 2003(3) LLJ90424. 1979(2) LLJ8025. 1986(2) LLJ62426. 2002(3) LLJ22927. AIR1966SC167228. 1979(2) ALT41129. 2004(1) LLJ19030. 2009 12 SCC4931. 2009 3 SCC3532. 2006 (1) SCC66733. 2007 (1) SCC40834. AIR2007631.35. 2008 AIR SCW399636. 2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-04-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: April 04, 2014 + CRL.A. 1441/2011 ALLAUDDIN Through: ....Appellant Ms. Anita Abraham, Advocate Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J1 Challenge in the present criminal appeal is to the impugned judgment dated 01.06.2011 and order on sentence dated 04.06.2011 whereby the AppellantAllaudin was convicted for committing an offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment along with the payment of fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default thereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month.2. In brief the case of the prosecution is as under:- On 10.04.2010, DD No.58A was lodged regarding a person getting stabbed at Murga mandi at PS Kalyan Puri. PW-3, HC Rajesh Kumar reached at t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-26-2014
$~13. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2185/2011 % Judgment dated 26.05.2014 ATLANTIC INDUSTRIES & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through : Mr.C.M. Lall, Ms.Nancy Roy and Mr.Anuj Nair, Advs. versus SIMRON FOOD PROCESSORS (P) LTD ..... Defendant Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiffs have filed the present suit for injunction and damages for infringement of registered trademark, passing off and for infringement of copyright. Summons were issued in the suit on 08.09.2011. An interim injunction was granted against the defendant on 08.09.2011. Counsel for the defendant entered appearance on 11.11.2011.2. In the order dated 31.05.2012, defendant submitted that the defendant has already stopped using the trademark of plaintiffs and has no intention to use the same in future. Further, parties also sought time to file an application for recording the compromise. However, the counsel for the defendant was not able to get the compromise applica...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-25-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. h March, 2014 % + CS(OS) 3137/2012 PFIZER PRODUCTS, INC THROUGH: Mr.Sahil Sethi, Advocate ..Plaintiff VERSUS R.K. SINGH & ANR THROUGH: None ..Defendants CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, passing off, rendition of accounts, delivery up and damages. Summons were issued in the suit on 19.10.2012, 02.01.2013, 25.02.2013 and on 19.07.2013. The plaintiff is aggrieved by use of the mark VIHAGRA by defendants. Despite service, none appeared on behalf of the defendants and they were accordingly proceeded ex parte on 15.01.2014.2. The plaintiff has filed affidavit by way of evidence of Mr. Samir Kazi (PW1), which is exhibited as Ex. PW-1/A. PW1 has deposed that he holds Power of Attorney from plaintiff in his favour and the same is exhibited as Ex. PW-1/1.3. Mr. Samir Kazi, PW1 has deposed tha...
Tag this Judgment!