Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-16-2014
Satyawan IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT201407.30 16:47 "I attested to the accuracy and integrity of this document" CHANDIGARH High Court Chandigarh CRA-D-770-DB-2002 Date of Decision :16. 07.2014 Sunil Kumar @ Sonu .......... Appellant Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent ***** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH Present : Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.S. Chatrath, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Manjari Nehru Kaul, Addl. A.G., Punjab. **** 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J.Sunil Kumar @ Sonu has filed this appeal against the judgment and order dated 16.09.2002, passed by the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur, whereby he has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code ( in short 'IPC') for committing the murder of Gulzari Lal and sentence...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-01-2014
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2287 OF2009Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod ..Appellant Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents W I T H CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1593 OF2014[Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.)No.2077 of 2009].; CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1594 OF2014[Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.)No.2112 of 2009].; CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1595 OF2014[Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.)No.2117 of 2009].; CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1596-1600 OF2014[Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.)Nos.1308-1312 of 2009].; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1601 OF2014[Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.)No.3762 of 2012].; CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1602 OF2014[Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.)No.3943 of 2012].; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1603 OF2014[Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.)No.3944 of 2012].; AND CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1604 OF2014[Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.)No.59 of 2013].. JUDGMENT VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.Leave granted in Special Leave Petitions. These Appeals raise a legal nodus of substantial public importance pertaining to Courts territorial...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-15-2014
Crl. Appeal No.D-695-DB of 2014 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Appeal No.D-695-DB of 2014 Date of decision: 15.7.2014 Ramesh Kumar Bagga ..Appellant Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH Present: Mr.S.P.Soi, Advocate for the appellant. Kuldip Singh, J. This judgment shall dispose of the appeal filed by Ramesh Kumar Bagga complainant against the judgment dated 3.3.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kapurthala vide which accused Vishal Pahwa @ Shallu and Satwant Raj @ Pappu (not party in present appeal) were convicted and the present respondents Manav and Bawa were acquitted of the charges framed against them under Sections 307, 452, 324, 323, 34 IPC. The case put-forward by complainant Ramesh Kumar Bagga is that on 26.5.2009 he alongwith his wife, daughter and Kumari Meenu 2014.08.06 12:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, C...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-04-2014
Rs.No.1970 of 2012(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rs.No.1970 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 04.08.2014 Bhinder Singh ......Appellant(s) Versus Jagpal Singh @ Rachpal Singh ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG1 Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment?. 2. To be referred to reporters or not?. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. * * * Present: Mr.L.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the appellant(s).Mr.Harish Goyal, Advocate for the respondent. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral) The plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for possession, of his half share in the suit land, by way of partition as described in the plaint, with a further prayer for restraining the defendant-appellant from alienating the suit land more than his share and by way of specific khaSr.numbeRs.The suit was decreed by the trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 8.12.2010 in the following manner: This suit is coming in this day for...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-04-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.2717 of 2014 Date of Decision : 4.8.2014 Ambika and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER ...Present: Mr.Gopal Singh Nahel, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab....MAHESH GROVER.J.The petitioneRs.grievance is that they were appointed as ETT Teachers in the Zila Parishad and are now absorbed in the Education Department even though a grievance has been made that a pick and choose policy has been followed but the issue of seniority has been raised. The petitioners were appointed in the district cadre which prohibited a transfer outside the district except in the case of matrimony necessitating facilitation of getting the married couple posted at one station. In this regard an option was to be exercised by the affected employee and in terms of Annexure P-5, the relevant part of which is extracted herebelow, the seniority was to be p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-05-2014
CP No.129 of2014(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CP No.129 of2014(O&M) Date of Decision : 05.08.2014 ELDECO MIDC SEZ Limited ....Non Petitioner/Transferor Company with ELDECO Infrastructure and Properties Limited .....Petitioner/Transferee Company CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present : Mr.Mukesh Sukhija and Mr.Yash Pal Gupta, Advocates for the petitioner Company MAHESH GROVER, J. This is a petition under Section 391 (1) read with Section 100- 104 of the Companies Act, 1956 in connection with the proposed Scheme of Arrangement for reduction of capital of ELDECO MIDC SEZ Limited and Amalgamation of ELDECO MIDC SEZ Limited ( Tranferor Company) with ELDECO INFRASTRUCTURE AND PROPERTIES Limited (Transferee Company).A copy of the proposed Scheme of Arrangement has been appended alongwith the petition at Anneuxre P-1. The Transferee Company is a public limited Company having its registered office in Faridabad and is thus having the competence to invoke...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-06-2014
CRA-S-1196-SB-2003 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-1196-SB-2003 Date of Decision:06. 08.2014 Harbhajan Singh ......Appellant Vs. State of Punjab .........Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHAVIR S. CHAUHAN Present: Mr. H.R. Nohria, Advocate, for the appellant. Ms. Shivali, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent-State. ***** MAHAVIR S. CHAUHAN, J.(ORAL) Bhag Singh, along with his father, Mohinder Singh and two sons Harbhajan Singh and Avtar Singh, was tried for the offence punishable under Sections 307/326/324/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-Fast Track Court, Ferozepur (for short 'the trial Court') Bhag Singh died during the pendency of trial. Vide judgment/order dated 21.04.2003, learned trial Court acquitted Avtar Singh as prosecution could not fix his guilt beyond reasonable doubt but Mohinder Singh was convicted under Section 323, IPC, and was released on p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-07-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve:23. 01.2014 Date of Decision:07. 08.2014 + CM(M) 1087/2013 & CM No.16069/2013 SHRI SUDHIR SABHARWAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja with Ms. Rashmi Verma, Advs. versus SHRI RAJESH PRUTHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. B.M.Bharti, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI1 This petition impugns an order dated 10.9.2013 whereby the petitioner/plaintiffs application under Order 12 Rule 6 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure was rejected. The petitioner had filed a suit seeking decree of possession in their favour against the respondent in respect of the premises in dispute. The application sought made decree on the basis of admissions by the respondent/defendant in his written statement. The petitioner/plaintiff is a landlord of property No.G-27/4, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi. Its ground floor comprising two bed rooms with attached bathroom, kitchen, drawing room and portion of the f...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : August 12, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : August 14, 2014 + CRL.A. 1326/2012 & Crl.M.A.No.8563/2014 SURESH @ MUCCHAD Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Anita Abraham, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with SI Ajay Singh P.S.Darya Ganj CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Suresh @ Muchhad has been held guilty for having murdered Ram Babu in the late evening of April 15, 2011 at a Tikona park (Triangular Park) adjoining Sulabh Shochalaya near gate No.3 of Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Hospital. The learned Trial Judge has believed Mohd. Izhar PW-1 and Mohd.Alam PW-3 as truthful eye witnesses. The knife Ex.P-1 opined by Dr.Kulbhushan PW-11 who conducted the post mortem on the dead body of Ram Babu as the one from which injuries could be caused to the deceased, which knife was recovered from the personal search ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-14-2014
CWP No.8980 of 2014(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.8980 of 2014(O&M) Date of Decision : 14.08.2014 Harjinder Singh and others ......Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate for the petitioners Ms.Monica Chibber Sharma, DAG, Punjab MAHESH GROVER, J The petitioners impugn public notice (Annexure P-15).Similar notice was challenged before this Court in CWP No.1572 of 2013 where similarly situated persons as the petitioners who were selected pursuant to selection process in the year 2008 put it to question. The said writ petition was disposed of with the following directions:- Directions are issued to the respondents to issue a public notice calling for applications from interested candidates possessing higher qualifications of B.P.E/ B.P.Ed/ D.P.Ed/ M.P.Ed prior to 29.04.2008 within a period of 30 days from the date of such publication of the not...
Tag this Judgment!