Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-08-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 10, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 08, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1065/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with SI Dalip Kumar, Spl.Cell/NDR. versus BASHIR AHMED PONNU & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Dinesh Sharma, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate for Respondent No.4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. The State is aggrieved by the decision of the learned Additional Sessions Judge acquitting the respondents Bashir Ahmed Ponnu, Fayaz Ahmed Lone, Abdul Majeed Baba and Shahid Gafoor for the offences punishable under Section 120B/121/121-A/122/123 IPC & Section 17/18/20/21/23 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (in short the UAP Act), acquitting Bashir Ahmed for offence punishable under Section 489(B)/489 (C) of IPC and Shahid Gafoor for offences punishable under Section 186/353/...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-08-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 6387/2012 & CM No.17030/2012 MALIK TANNING INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 4754/2014 & CM94672014 M/S. KAVISH IMPEX PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Ms Shikha Sapra for petitioner in W.P.(C) 4754/2014. Mr Naveen Malhotra for petitioner in W.P.(C) 6387/2012. For the Respondents : Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C) 6387/2012. Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr Amrit Singh for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in W.P.(C) 4754/2014. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners impugn policy circular No.42 (RE-2010)/2009-14 dated 21.10.2011 issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (hereafter referred to as impugned circular) inasmuch as it curtails the benefit available under Focus Product Scheme in respect of Techn...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-08-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 6387/2012 & CM No.17030/2012 MALIK TANNING INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 4754/2014 & CM94672014 M/S. KAVISH IMPEX PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Ms Shikha Sapra for petitioner in W.P.(C) 4754/2014. Mr Naveen Malhotra for petitioner in W.P.(C) 6387/2012. For the Respondents : Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C) 6387/2012. Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr Amrit Singh for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in W.P.(C) 4754/2014. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners impugn policy circular No.42 (RE-2010)/2009-14 dated 21.10.2011 issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (hereafter referred to as impugned circular) inasmuch as it curtails the benefit available under Focus Product Scheme in respect of Techn...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-25-2014
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10529 OF2014(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.11696 OF2007 SRI SIDHHARTH VIYAS & ANR. ...APPELLANTS VERSUS RAVI NATH MISRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT ADARSH KUMAR GOEL J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal has been preferred against the Judgment and Order dated 7th May, 2007 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Civil Side in Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No.47201 of 2002.3. The question for consideration is whether Section 12(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (for short ".the Act".) providing for 'deemed vacancy' is applicable to a situation where the tenant or a member of his family builds, acquires or otherwise gets a vacant building in the area concerned after commencement of the tenancy but prior to application of the Act to the tenancy in question.4. Brief reference to facts giving rise to the question is necessary...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-28-2014
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.420 OF2012SURESH & ANR. ..... APPELLANTS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ..... RESPONDENT JUDGMENT ADARSH KUMAR GOEL J.1. This appeal has been preferred against conviction and sentence of the appellants under Sections 302 read with Sections 34, 364-A, 201 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.2. Case of the prosecution is that on 18th December, 2000, the deceased Devender Chopra and his son deceased Abhishek Chopra had left their factory for their house in D.L.F., Gurgaon but did not reach their house. At about 9.41 P.M., PW-12 Pooja Chopra, daughter of Devender Chopra gave a call to her father to find out as to why he was late. She learnt that her father and brother had been kidnapped and ransom of rupees fifty lacs was demanded for their release. She contacted her father's business partner informing him that Devender Chopra and Abhishek Chopra were kidnapped and the kidnappers had demanded a ransom a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Oct-14-2014
Cav Judgment: 1. Admit. Learned advocate Mr. Dilip L. Kanojiya waives service of notice of admission on behalf of respondents. 1.1 Heard learned advocate Mr. J. T. Trivedi for the appellant and learned senior counsel Mr. S. R. Sanjanwala with learned advocate Mr. Dilip L. Kanojia for all the respondents. 2. Pursuant to order dated 29.11.2013, parties have produced compilation of relevant papers and made submissions for final disposal of the appeal. 3. The appellant is original plaintiff; whereas respondents are original defendants before the Civil Court at Valsad, camp @ Vapi in Special Civil Suit No. 17 of 2011. In such suit, plaintiff has prayed for specific performance to agreement to sell dated 10.01.1981 and possession receipt dated 25.12.1982 with alternative relief of declaration that because of suit property is in possession of the plaintiff since the year 1981 - 1982 it amounts to an adverse possession for more than 30 years with a permanent injunction as restraining the defen...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Sep-11-2014
1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Tejas P. Satta for the applicant, learned APP Ms.Jirga Jhaveri for respondent no.1 - State and learned advocate Mr.Pratik Barot for respondent no.2 - original accused and applicant in application for bail before the Sessions Court, Mehsana, which is challenged herein. 2. By impugned judgment and order dated 29.3.2014, 3rd Addl.Sessions Judge, Mehsana has granted bail to respondent no.2 in Criminal Misc.Application no.180 of 2014 for the offences registered u/ss.143, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 324, 504 and 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 135 of Gujarat Police Act pursuant to FIR registered with Mehsana 'B' Division police station being I - C.R.No.25 of 2014. Applicant herein is original complainant. On 8.2.2014, he lodged a complaint contending that on previous day i.e. on 7.2.2014, there was a scuffle between him and one driver of a tanker regarding small accident between his two-wheeler and such tanker. Thereafter, he had been to his gara...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Nov-27-2014
Oral 1. This writ petition was filed in 2008 by the Jogighopa Ashok Kagajkal Sramik Santha, represented by its Secretary, C/o- Ashok Paper Mill (Assam) Ltd. District- Bongaigaon, Assam. Apart from the prayer for appropriate decision in respect of the Mill and also the future of its employees and workers, further prayer made is to direct the respondents to pay the admissible salaries to the existing employees and workers for the periods indicated in the prayer portion of the writ petition specified as:- Take appropriate steps to clear the outstanding dues to the employees and workers of the Mill for the period of April-May of 1995, August 1997 to October, 1997 and October 1998 to 7th March, 2008. Take appropriate steps to make up to date the provident fund accounts of the employees and workers of the Mill in question for the gap period i.e. w.e.f. 01.04.1995 up to 30.09.1998 of all the employees/workers including those who retired and expired in the meantime. Another prayer made in the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Feb-07-2014
(CAV), J. 1. The challenge in the writ petition is the Annexure-XIII Request for Proposal (RFP) dated 03/02/2012 followed by the Memorandum of Understanding dated 11/06/2012 entered into between the Government of Assam in the Health and Family Welfare Department headed by the Mission Director, National Rural Health Mission (hereinafter referred to as NRHM), Assam and the respondent No.4 Narayan Hrudayalaya, a private limited Company, as according to the petitioners such a course of action adopted by the respondents is contrary to the earlier promise made out to them in respect of running of the particular hospital, namely, Tolaram Subhkaran Bafna District Hospital. SEQUENCE OF EVENTS: 2. The petitioners numbering 3 are charitable trust registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and are represented by their Chairman and Managing Trustee. They have filed the writ petition challenging the action of the Government of Assam in the Health Department in entering into a Memorandum o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-27-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Impugned Order Dt.12.12.2013 Passed In T.A.No.470/2013 By The Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore Bench Vide Annx-E.) 1. Present writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India requesting this Court to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order passed on 12.12.2013 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, in case bearing T.A.No.470/2013 and consequently, to dismiss the said case T.A.No.470/2013. 2. Respondent was applicant before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore Bench. Respondent No.1-Yaswanth G.V. appeared for the Civil Service Examination (CSE) 2009, under the category "Physically Handicapped" (Visually impaired) and secured 107th rank. Hence, his name was recommended as a successful candidate by the Union Public Service Commission in VI sub-category o...
Tag this Judgment!