Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA THURSDAY, THE10H DAY OF JULY201419TH ASHADHA, 1936 WA.No. 776 of 2014 --------------------------- [AGAINST THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.P.(C).NO.13909/2014 DATED0306-2014 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT] ................. APPELLANT/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------- THE CORPORATE MANAGER, ST. JOSEPH'S HIGH SCHOOL, KIDANGOOR, ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. BY ADVOCATE GENERAL SRI. K.P. DANDAPANI, SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. T.T. MUHAMOOD. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON0307-2014, ALONG WITH W.P.(C).NO.13909/2014 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON1007-...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-15-2014
CWP No.537 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CM No.2622 of 2014 in/and CWP No.537 of 2014 Date of Decision : 15.7.2014 Pawan Kumar ......Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents ..CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK ..Present : Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate for the petitioner..RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J CM No.2622 of 2014 Applicant seeks to place on record Annexure P-12-B i.e.the seniority list. Application is allowed as prayed for. Document Annexures P-12-B is permitted to be placed on record. C.M.stands disposed of. CWP No.537 of 2014 Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of respondent authorities, petitioner has approached this court by way of instant petition, under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when the grievance of the petitioner was not being redressed, he finally approached Sahni Gre...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-15-2014
CWP No.5414 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.5414 of 2013(O&M) Date of decision:15.7.2014 Gajraj Singh .Petitioner VERSUS Union of India and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH Present: Mr.R.S.Sihota, Senior Advocate with Mr.B.R.Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Karminder Singh, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. **** HEMANT GUPTA, J.(Oral) The challenge in the present writ petition is to an order passed by Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh Regional Bench at Chandimandir (for short the Tribunal) on 09.05.2011 whereby a Civil Suit filed by the petitioner before the Civil Judge (Junior Division).Rewari, transferred to the Tribunal, was dismissed. The petitioner served in Indian Navy from 21.07.1959 to 12.07.1971 and was placed in Indian Navy Fleet Reserve w.e.f.17.09.1970 for a period of 10 yeaRs.The eligibility to earn pension in terms of Regulation 78 of Navy (Pension) Regulations,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-17-2014
CWP No.1143 of 2013 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.1143 of 2013 (O&M) Reserved on:01.07.2014. Date of decision:17.07.2014 Sarabjit Kaur & others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA Present: Mr.G.S.Sirphikhi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Aman Bahri, Addl.A.G., Punjab. Mr.B.S.Bhalla, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3. Mr.V.S.Kataria, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ***** G.S.Sandhawalia J.1. The present writ petition has been filed by 57 petitioners, who are seeking a direction that roll numbers/admit cards be issued to them and they be allowed to sit in the Auxiliary Nurses & Mid-wives Course (for short, the 'ANM course') theory examinations, commencing from January, 2013.2. In view of the fact that the writ petition came up for hearing on 21.01.2013, for the first time, interim orders were passed permitting the petitioners to appear in the examination which were commencing...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-18-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.6994 of 2003 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 18.07.2014 District Bar Association, Panchkula ..Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL,CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present: Mr.Sudhir Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.H.S.Lalli, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana Mr.D.V.Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ajay Nara, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3/HUDA .SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral).The writ petition has been filed by the District Bar Association, Panchkula, which is an association of lawyeRs.through its elected representatives in pursuance to a resolution duly passed. A challenge is laid to the notification dated 12.1.1999 amending the Haryana Urban Development (Disposal of Land and Buildings) Regulations, 1978 (hereinafter to be referred to as the said Regulations.).In terms of the Regulations originally framed, the undisput...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Decided on : Jul-17-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK JAIL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.213 OF 2000 Arising out of Judgment dated 26.8.2000 passed by the Sessions Judge, Dhenkanal in Sessions Trial No.2-A of 1989. --------------Jasobanta Sahu Appellant -versusState of Orissa Respondent For appellants : Mrs. Usharani Padhi For respondent : Mr. B.P. Pradhan (Addl. Government Advocate) --------------Date of Judgment: 17.07.2014 ----------------- P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI JUSTICE PRADIP MOHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Biswajit Mohanty, J.The present Jail Criminal Appeal has a chequred history. Sessions Trial No.2-A of 1989 from out of which the present Jail Criminal Appeal arises was initially disposed of vide judgment dated 24.8.1991 by the learned Sessions Judge, Dhenkanal, who while acquitting the appellant of the charge under Section 302, IPC, convicted the app...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-18-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.4489 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision:18.7.2014 The New Haryana Coop. Transport Society Ltd......Appellant(s) Versus Anand Kumar Tyagi & ors......Respondent(s) FAO No.4490 of 2014 (O&M) The New Haryana Coop. Transport Society Ltd......Appellant(s) Versus Anand Kumar Tyagi & ors......Respondent(s) FAO No.4491 of 2014 (O&M) The New Haryana Coop. Transport Society Ltd......Appellant(s) Versus Anand Kumar Tyagi & ors......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG1 Whether Reporter of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?. 2. To be referred to reporters or not?. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?. * * * Present: Mr.Gopal Sharma, Advocate for the appellant(s).Mr.R.C.Kapoor, Advocate for the Insurance Company. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral) These appeals (i.e.FAO No.4489 to 4491 of 2014) have been Saini Pushpinder 2014.07.24 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this docum...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jul-22-2014
ORDER SHEET G.A.No.2162 of 2014 C.S.No.245 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BRIJ GOPAL MUNDHARA Versus G.B.PRODUCTS & ORS.Plaintiff/Petitioner Defendants/Respondents BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date : 22nd July, 2014. For Plaintiff/Petitioner : Mr.Ranjan Bachawat, Sr.Adv.with Mr.Sayantan Bose & Mr.Prithvi Raj Sinha, Adversus For Defendant Nos.1&3 : Mr.Soumya Chowdhury with Mr.Sunil Singhania, Adversus For Defendant Nos.2,4 & 5 : Mr.Soumabha Ghose, Adv.This is an action under the Designs Act, 2000. Section 11 of the Act provides that when the design is registered, the proprietor of the design shall have copyright for ten yeaRs.Section 22 thereof describes unlawful use of copyright in a design as piracy. The plaintiff is the manufacturer and seller of childrens wear. Pictures of those dresses are shown in Annexure B at page 25 of the petition. According to the plaintiff, these dresses are novel in terms of shape, configur...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-11-2014
CWP No.17785 of 2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.17785 of 2012 Reserved on:28. 05.2014 Date of decision:11. 07.2014 M/s. IAA Hospital Pvt. Ltd. and another ...Petitioner(s) Versus The Authorized Officer, UCO Bank and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA Present: Mr. Manish Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Anupam Gupta, Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Nandini Nanda, Advocate, and Mr. Gautam Pathania, Advocate, for respondent No.1-UCO Bank. Mr. Karan Khehar, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. Mr. Sudhir Pruthi, Advocate, for respondent No.4.1. To be referred to the Reporters or not?. Yes 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J.1. The present judgment shall dispose of 3 writ petitions i.e. CWP Nos. 17785, 14741 and 15248 of 2012 since common questions of facts and law are involved in all the writ petitions. The facts are being taken from CWP No.177...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-28-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: July 28, 2014 + CS(OS) 2243/2014 STAR INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sidharth Chopra, Ms.Sneha Jain, Mr.Prateek Chadha and Ms.Savni Dutt, Advs. versus HANEETH UJWAL & ORS Through ..... Defendants None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) I.A. No.13873/2014 This is an application filed by the plaintiffs under Order 13 Rule 1 read with Section 151 CPC seeking exemption from filing the originals of the documents. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, subject to originals being produced at the time of admission/denial of the documents. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.13874/2014 This is an application filed by the plaintiffs seeking exemption from filing the certified copies, clear copies, translations of documents and the left side margin. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, subject to just...
Tag this Judgment!