Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-26-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE26H DAY OF FEBRUARY20147TH PHALGUNA, 1935 WP(C).No. 22228 of 2013 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- RAJAGIRI RUBBER & PRODUCE COMPANY LTD., ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, DOOR NO. 27/1032, PANAMPILLYNAGAR, KOCHI-682 036, KERALA, REPRESENTED BY GILBERT D'SOUZA, ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT (HR & ADMINISTRATION). BY ADVS. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SRI.P.GOPINATH, SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS, SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI. RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.2. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.3. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATI...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-20-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA THURSDAY, THE20H DAY OF FEBRUARY20141ST PHALGUNA, 1935 CRL.A.No. 2355 of 2009 (D) --------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN SC5372007 of SESSIONS COURT, THALASSERY, DATED3007-2009 APPELLANT(S)/ACCUSED: --------------------- SWAMINATHAN, S/O.RAMASWAMI, AGED40YEARS, COOLIE, MATHAKOVILTHERU, KOVALAM VILLAGE, KANJIPURAM DISTRICT, TAMILNADU, NOW RESIDING AT KALLULLAPARAMBATH HOSUE, KOLAVALLUR AMSOM THOOVAKUNNU. BY ADV. SRI.K.ANAND RESPONDENT(S)/STATE & COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLAVALLUR POLICE STATION. BY ADDITIONAL D.G.P. SRI.TOM JOSE PADINJAREKKARA THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON112.2014, THE COURT ON202.2014 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ami/ V.K.MOHANAN & B.KEMAL PASHA, JJ.------------------------------- Cr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-28-2014
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM REVISION CASE No.122 of 2000 28-01-2014 Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, Indraprastha Marg, New Delhi...Petitioner Shri G. Pattabhi Rama Charya, F.C.A., Chartered Accountant, Flat No.13, 1-2- 133, Super Complex, 1st Floor, Kalasiguda, Secunderabad - 500 003....Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner :Sr.T.S.Anand Counsel for the Respondent: Sr.P. Venu Gopal Sr.S. Ravi, Learned Senior Counsel and Amicus Curie : ?.Cases referred: 1 (1984) 2 SCC5562 1961 Company Cases 966 (Vol.XXXIII) 3 1958 AIR724 (1986) 4 SCC5375 AIR1968Delhi 283 (Vik,55, C.72) HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.122 OF2000ORDER:- (per Hon'ble Sr.Justice Challa Kodanda Ram) This reference case is placed before this Court by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, Indraprastha Marg, New Delhi, (hereinafter referred to as ".the Institute".).in compliance with ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-28-2014
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.695 OF2014(Arising Out of SLP (Crl.) No.1953 of 2013) DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY & ORS. ... APPELLANT (S) VERSUS RAJU THR. MEMBER JUVENILE ... RESPONDENT (S) JUSTICE BOARD & ANR. With W.P. (Crl.) No.204 of 2013 JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, J.SLP (Crl.) No.1953 of 2013 1. On 16th December, 2012 a young lady (23 years in age) and her friend were returning home after watching a movie in a multiplex located in one of the glittering malls of Delhi. They boarded a bus to undertake a part of the journey back home. While the bus was moving, 5 persons brutally assaulted the young lady, sexually and physically, and also her friend. Both of them were thrown out of the bus. The young lady succumbed to her injuries on 29.12.2012.2. Five persons were apprehended in connection with the crime. One of them, identified for the purpose of the present case as Raju, was below 18 years of age on the date of commission o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-24-2014
ORDER SHEET GA NO.5 OF2014WITH CS NO.457 OF2013IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE MANGLAM FISCAL SERVICES PVT.LTD.Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date : 24th March, 2014. Mr.S.N. Mitra, senior advocate, Mr.A.Mukherjee, Mr.S.Banerjee, Ms.S.Sinhaappear. Mr.K.BhattacharyaappeaRs.The Court : Mr.S.N.Mitra, learned senior advocate cited Standard Chartered Bank vs.V.Noble Kumar And Others with Criminal Appeal No.1217 of 2013 Senior Manager, State Bank of India And Another vs.R.Shiva Subramaniyan And Another; reported in [2013].9 SCC620 He relied on paragraph 28, which is inserted below. It can be noticed from the language of the proviso to Section 13[3-A].and the language of section 17 that an appeal under Section 17 is available to the borrower only after losing possession of the secured asset. The employment of the words aggrieved by taken by the secured creditor [emphasis supplied].in Section 17[1].clear...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-26-2014
Crl. Appeal No.1624-SB of 2003 -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Appeal No.1624-SB of 2003 Date of Decision: March 26, 2014 Shambhu Kumar and others ---Appellants versus State of Haryana ---Respondent Coram: Hon'ble MRS.Justice Rekha Mittal Present: Mr.Rahul Vats, Advocate for the appellants Mr.Anupam Sharma, AAG, Haryana for respondent-State. *** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. *** REKHA MITTAL, J. The present appeal has been directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30.8.2003 and 1.9.3003, respectively., whereby the appellants namely Shambhu Kumar and Rambhu, sons of Naresh Mangal and Sangeeta wife of Anirudh Mishra have been convicted and sentenced for commission of offence punishable under Sections 307, 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short Saini Paramjit Kaur...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-27-2014
CWP No.9145 of 1994 [1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.9145 of 1994 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.3.2014 Punjab State Stenos Welfare Association .Petitioner v. State of Punjab and another .Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate for the petitioner(s).Mr.Anshul Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab..Rajesh Bindal J. This order will dispose of two petitions bearing CWP Nos.9145 of 1994 and 6704 of 1995, as common questions of law and facts are involved. The facts have been noticed from CWP No.9145 of 1994. The petition has been filed by Punjab State Stenos Welfare Association with a prayer that recommendations made by Third Pay Commission be implemented in its entirety. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in Part-IX of the report in para 11.25, Third Pay Commission recommended regarding rationalisation of the cadre of StenographeRs.which provided for upgradation of certain posts. The afo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.517/1999 % Reserved on:24. h January, 2014 Date of Decision:3. d April, 2014 GURDEEP SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate. Versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J: Appellant-Gurdeep Singh challenges his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) for murder of Baljit Singh and violation of Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959, vide judgment dated 15th March, 1999 in Sessions Case No.30/98 arising out of FIR No.946/1997, Police Station Patel Nagar. By order on the point of sentence dated 16th March, 1999, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.500/- under Section 302 IPC. In default of payment of fine, he has to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment. For the offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act, he ha...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.476/1998 Reserved on:28. h February, 2014 Date of Decision:3. d April, 2014 % SHANKAR LAL@SHANKAR Through ..... Appellant Mr. Rajan Bhatia, Advocate. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Additional Public Prosecutor. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J: Shankar Lal @ Shankar by the impugned judgment dated 30th September, 1998 stands convicted under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for murder of his uncle Mukesh Kumar. Said Mukesh Kumar was son of Mishri Lal from his second wife, whereas the appellant herein is son of Rohtas, who was born from the first wife of Mishri Lal. By order on sentence dated 6th October, 1998, the appellant has been sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.5000/-, in default of which, he has to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for six months.2. The main contention or plea raised in the appeal ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Apr-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Kang Gursharan Singh 2014.04.04 12:27 Civil Writ Petition No.21175 of 2013 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : APRIL02 2014 PREETI ......PETITIONER VERSUS THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE SUPPLY AND MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN PALLI PRESENT: Sarvshri Vivek Malik and Saran Suri, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr.Manav Bajaj, Advocate, for Mr.Sumeet Goel, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Respondent No.4 ex-parte vide order dated 14.01.2014. Mr.Vishal Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.5 and 6..SANJAY KISHAN KAUL KAUL,, CJ. (Oral) The Haryana State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'Hafed')/respondent No.1 invited tenders on 23.7.2012 for construction of a godown of the capacity of 45,000 Metric Ton in Round V under Private Ent...
Tag this Judgment!