Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 14TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 29360 of 2012 (T) PETITIONER: ------------ MOHAMAD BIN B POCKER AGED 6 YEARS S/O.POCKER,KUTTIPARAMBIL HOUSE,P.O.TIRUNNAVAYA MALAPPURAM 301. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR,PIN 001. 2. THE SUB REGISTRAR, SUB REGISTRAR'S OFFICE,TANUR,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN 101. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUR 101. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 29360 of 2012 (T) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY NASRATHUL ISLAM SANGAM, THAMARASSERY. EXHIBIT P2. TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTERED DOCUMENT NO.3239/2002 OF SUB REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, TANUR. EXHIBIT P3. TRUE COPY O...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-03-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY 2013 13TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 251 of 2013 (F) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- V.M.NOUFAL, GOLDEN FURNITURE INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT PLOT, ATHIRAMPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.V.N.SUNIL KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KSEB, ATHIRAMPUZHA 68 562.2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, KSEB, ETTUMANOOR 68 631. BY SRI.JAICE JACOB,SC,KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO.251/2013 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 : COPY OF SITE MAHAZAR DATED 05 12.2012 EXHIBIT P2 : COPY OF PROVISIONAL ASSESSMENT ORDER EXHIBIT P3 : COPY OF PROVISIONAL BILL DATED 07 12.2012. EXHIBIT P4 : COPY OF OBJECTION DATED 12 12.2012 FILED BY THE PETITIONER AGAISNT THE PROVISIONAL ASSESSMENT ORDER...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-03-2013
$~R-21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 03, 2013 + W.P.(C) 3283/2001 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocates versus HARISH KUMAR YADAV & ANR. Represented by: None. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Respondent No.1 Harish Kumar Yadav had sought a voluntary discharge from the Indian Army and had to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal when his appointment as a Constable (Executive) (treating him to be an ex-serviceman) was sought to be cancelled by the writ petitioner as per its order dated September 24, 1999 on the ground that having sought voluntary discharge from the Indian Army, Harish Kumar Yadav was not entitled to be considered as an Ex-serviceman.2. Now, the Tribunal has noted that the Ex-servicemen (Re-employment in Central Civil Services and Posts) Rules, 1979 do not define as to w...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JANUARY 2013 12TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 31665 of 2010 (G) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- DR.N.SUKUMARAN, SREEPADMAM, KURPPANKULANGARA P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA 551. BY ADVS.SRI.K.BABU RAJAN SRI.SREEKANTH S.NAIR SRI.R.NIKHIL SRI.RAJAN P.KALIYATH SRI.T.A.SREE KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE TRAVANCORE - COCHIN MEDICAL COUNCIL,REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT/REGISTRAR RED CROSS ROAD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695035.2. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE,SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI.3. THE CENTRAL COUNCIL OF HOMOEPATHY, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT,NEW DELHI - 110001.4. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,MINISTRY OF HEALTH TRIVANDRUM - 695035.5. THE ADVISOR TO GOVT.OF INDIA (HOMOEO) DEPARTMENT OF I.S.M. & HOMOEO,ROOM NO:14 IRCS BUILDING ANNEXE,1-RED CROSS...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JANUARY 2013 11TH POUSHA 193 Crl.MC.No. 3576 of 2012 () ------------------------------------- CRIME NO.361/2011 OF CHANDERA POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT ..... PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------- 1. MOHAMMED NOUFAL, S/O. MUHAMMED KUNHI, MADAKKAL, SOUTH THRIKARIPPUR VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.2. JAMEELA M., W/O.MUHAMMED KUNHI, MADAKKAL, SOUTH THRIKARIPPUR VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.3. JASSEERA M.K D/O.JAMEELA, MADAKKAL, SOUTH THRIKARIPPUR VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.4. SALAM, KOTTI, PAYANNUR, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS SMT.P.K.PRIYA SRI.K.V.SREE VINAYAKAN SRI.K.M.HASHIR SRI.K.M.MUHAMMED HUSSAIN RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM REPRESENTING S.I OF POLICE,CHANDERA POLICE STATION.2. ARIFA K.C., ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. MANJULA CHELLUR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JANUARY 2013 11TH POUSHA 193 OP (CAT).No. 4560 of 2012 (Z) ----------------------------- OA.174/2012 OF CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM BENCH ------------------ PETITIONER / APPLICANT : ---------------------------------------- RAHUL A. RAVI, MANNU CHERAYIL, PERUMPADANNA, NORTH PARAVUR ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.SUJIN RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS : -------------------------------------------------- 1. CHIEF STAFF OFFICER (P & A) SOUTHERN NAVAL COMMAND HEAD QUARTERS, KOCHI 006. 2. THE FLAG OFFICER COMMANDING IN CHIEF, HEAD QUARTERS SOUTHERN NAVAL COMMAND, KOCHI-682 006.3. VIPIN T.P. THITTAYIL HOUSE, PONURRINNI, ERNAKULAM-682 021. BY ADV. SRI. P. PARAMESWARAN NAIR, ASGI THIS OP (CAT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- OP (CAT).No. 4560 of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JANUARY 2013 11TH POUSHA 193 MACA.No. 220 of 2011 ( ) ------------------------ ` OPMV.No.1831/2004 of THE ADDL. M.A.C.T.,KOTTAYAM APPELLANT/3RD RESPONDENT: --------------------------- THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD, DIVISIONAL OFFICE,KOTTAYAM,REP.BY THE AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY,THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD,REGIONAL OFFICE,METRO PALACE,ERNAKULAM NORTH KOCHI-18. BY ADV. SRI.A.R.GEORGE RESPONDENTS/CLAIMANT & RESPONDENTS 1 & 2: ------------------------------------------- 1. SUMA @ BINDU,D/O.KUTTAN,PUNNILAM THARAYIL HOUSE,PUNNATHARA.P.O,AYARKUNNAM KOTTAYAM-686583.2. SASEENDRAN @ NOBLE,S/O.KOCHOLAKUMAR, PULLORTHOTTIYIL HOUSE,KIDANGOOR SOUTH.P.O KOTTAYAM-686583.3. KUMARAN VASU,CHERUKATTIL HOUSE, KATTACHIRA.P.O,KOTTAYAM-686572. R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SHAJU THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-08-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR Cri. Appeal No.2279/1996 Killu, aged 50 years, son of Baldeva Kachhi, Resident Of Village Jaitpur, P.S. Kishangarh, Distt. Chhatarpur Appellant vs. State of M.P., through SHO P.S. Kishangarh, Distt. Chhatarpur Respondent .. Shri Shyam Vishwakarma, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, P.L. for respondent-State. JUDGMENT (8/1/13) The appellant stands convicted under Section 8 read with 18 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1 lakh and in default, to suffer R.I. for 2 years. Corresponding judgment dated 12.12.1996 passed by Special Judge (under the Act), Chhatarpur, in Special Case No.36/96 is the subject matter of challenge in this appeal.2. Prosecution story, in short, is that on 9/3/1996 at about 12.30 p.m., on being informed that appellant was involved in an illegal cultivation of opium poppy on the field lo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
Decided on : Jan-08-2013
Oral Judgment: (V.M. Kanade, J.) Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the reliefs claimed by the petitioners in para (A), are as under : "(A) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 to take appropriate action in the matter of illegal constructions/activities being carried out by the Respondent Nos.6 and 7, viz.:- (a) The installation and operation of Restaurant in the basement of Building Nos.22, 23 and 24; (b) The installation and commencement of Outdoor Restaurant and tandoori kitchen in the open spaces as indicated in Photograph at "ANNEXURE D"; (c) The illegal construction and storage of L.P.G. Cylinders therein as indicated in Photograph at "ANNEXURE C"; (d) Construction of Building Nos.33 and...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-07-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:- 07.01.2013 Coram:- The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.RAJA Writ Petition No.8187 of 2002 R.Dhanabalan ... Petitioner vs.1. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, through Chairman cum Managing Director.2. Director, Planning & Projects, Neyveli Lignite Corpn, Ltd, 3. J.L.Mehta, Director (Planning & Projects), Respondents 1 to 3 having office at Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, Corporation Office, Block 1, Neyveli. ... Respondents Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus as stated therein. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Singaravelan For Respondents : Mr.N.A.K.Sarma The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the order in Memo not D (P&P) C 21/SM/2002, dt.14.02.2002, passed by the 2nd respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the respond...
Tag this Judgment!