Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-15-2013
CRM not M-22888 o1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. not M-22888 of 2011 Date of Decision:-15.1.2013 Parminder Kaur ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & Anr. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr.A.S.Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.P.S.Bajwa, Addl. AG Punjab for respondent No.1. Mr.Sandeep Arora, Advocate for respondent No.2. MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR, J.(Oral) The crux of the facts & material, culminating in the commencement, relevant for deciding the instant petition and emanating from the record, is that, the marriage of complainant-Amarjit Kaur, daughter of Kuldeep Singh respondent No.2 (for brevity the complainant.) was solemnized with Gurdeep Singh son of Joga Singh, on 7.4.2002, according to Sikh religious rites and ceremonies at Jalandhar. The marriage was stated to have been solemnized with great pump and show by spending ` 6 lacs and sufficient dowry articles & other golden ornaments, besides c...
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Jan-15-2013
Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach NOTE:Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus LOZMAN v. CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eleventh circuit No. 11626.Argued October 1, 2012Decided January 15, 2013 Petitioner Lozmans floating home was a house-like plywood structure with empty bilge space underneath the main floor to keep it afloat. He had it towed several times before deciding on a marina owned by the city of Riviera Beach (City). After various disputes with Lozman and unsuccessful efforts to evict him from the marina, the City brought a federal admiralty lawsuit in rem a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-14-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 24TH POUSHA 193 Bail Appl..No. 135 of 2013 ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMC.1402/2012 CRIME NO.321/2012 OF EDAVANNA POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT ACCUSED(S)/1ST ACCUSED: ---------------------- MOHAMMED NOUFAL AGED 2 YEARS S/O.MUHAMMED PALLATHIL HOUSE THRIKKALANGODE AMSOM DESOM MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS COMPLAINANT(S)/COMPLAINANT: --------------------------- STATE OF KERALA THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER EDAVANNA POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.LALIZA.T.Y THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: stu P.BHAVADASAN, J.---------------------------------------------------- BA No.135 of 2013 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of J...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-14-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 24TH POUSHA 193 Bail Appl..No. 201 of 2013 () ----------------------------- (CRIME NO. 1056/2011 OF PEECHI POLICE STATION , TRISSUR) PETITIONER/ACUSED NO.2: -------------------------------------------- NOUFAL, AGED 3 YEARS S/O.ABDUL KARIM,CHERIKKATHODY HOUSE,KURUVA DESOM MAKKARAPARAMBU.P.O,MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.B.PRAJITH RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------------------------ 1. STATE, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM.2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEECHI POLICE STATION,(CRIME NO.1056 OF 2011), PEECHI, THRISSUR DISTRICT.680 017. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.RASHEED THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.BHAVADASAN, J..................................................................... B.A. No.201 of 2013 ..........................
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-14-2013
REPORTABLE |IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA | |CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION | |CIVIL APPEAL No.124 OF 200.| | | |M/S. BANGALORE CLUB | |APPELLANT | |VERSUS | |COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. | |RESPONDENTS | WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.125 OF 2007.CIVIL APPEAL No.272 OF 201.(Arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) No.16863 of 2010), CIVIL APPEAL NO.273 OF 201.(Arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) No.16880 of 2010), CIVIL APPEAL NO.274 OF 201.(Arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) No.16881 of 2010), CIVIL APPEAL NO.275 OF 201.(Arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) No.16882 of 2010) CIVIL APPEAL NOS.276-277 OF 201.(Arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) Nos. 16883-16884 of 2010) AND CIVIL APPEAL NO.278 OF 201.(Arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) No.16879 of 2010) JUDGMENT D.K. JAIN, J.1. Leave granted in Special Leave Petitions.2. This batch of appeals arises from a common judgment and order pronounced by the High Court of Karnataka, in Income Tax Appeals No.115 of 1999 along with 70 of 2000, 3095 of 2005, 1547 of 2005, 1548 of 2005, 3091 of 2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-11-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 21ST POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 471 of 2013 () ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- A.N.NABEEL AGED 1 YEARS S/O.NOORUDHEEN SHAH,AMBALATH HOUSE THALIKKULAM VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT (MANAGER M/S. SHAH ADVERTISERS KADAVANTHODE BUILDING,WEST PALACE ROAD NEAR BHIMA GOLD,NORTH BUS STAND,THRISSUR 68 3104) BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE POLICE COMMISSIONER,COCHIN CITY ERNAKULAM 68 031.2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALAMASSERY CIRCLE OFFICE,KALAMASSERY P.O ERNAKULAM 68 104.3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION,PALARIVATTOM P.O ERNAKULAM DISTRICT025. 4. CHITHRAN, PROPRIETOR,CHITHRA PAINTERS,T.D ROAD COCHIN,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.M.K.ABOOBACKER R4 BY AD...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal not D-711-DB of 2007 Date of decision :10. 01.2013 Prem Kumar ...Appellant VERSUS State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH *** Present : Mr.P.P.S.Duggal, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr.B.S.Bhalla, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent-State. *** INDERJIT SINGH, J The instant appeal is directed against the judgment and order of sentence dated 05.06.2007, passed by the Sessions Judge, Faridkot, vide which appellant Prem Kumar has been held guilty and convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for two yeaRs.Brief facts of the prosecution case are that FIR in the present case was registered on the statement of Laxmi Devi, complainant, widow of deceased Shashi Pal. She ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:10. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Appeal (MD).No.40 o1. Felix Rajkumar 2.John Victor 3.Santhosh Akaikalaraj 4.Gandhi @ Joseph 5.Henri 6.Amalraj .. Appellants vs. State by the Inspector of Police Kallakudi Police Station, Thiruchirappalli District. .. Respondent Cr.No.54/2002 Criminal appeal is filed under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code against the conviction and sentence passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Fast Track Court No.1, Thiruchirappalli in S.C.No.45 of 2005, dated 29.11.2005 and prays to set aside the same. !For appellants ... Mr.S.Ashok Kumar Senior Counsel for Mr.AR.Jeya Rhuthran ^For respondent ... Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J) Challenge in this appeal is to the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants. in S.C.No.45 of 2009. on the file ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:10. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL CRL.R.C.(MD)No.10 of 2013 Marimuthu ... Petitioner Vs The State rep. by The Inspector of Police Uthamapalayam Police Station, Theni District. (in Crime No.312 of 2011) ... Respondent PRAYER Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 read with and 401 (1) of Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records relating to the judgment dated 02.11.2012 made in S.T.C.No.219 of 2012 on the file of Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthamapalayam and expunge the remark of granting benefit of doubt and to hold it as honorary acquittal for the petitioner. !For Petitioner ... Mr.R.Gandhi for M/s.Ajmal Associates ^For Respondent ... Mr.P.Kandasamy, GA (Criminal Side) :ORDER The Petitioner/A6 has filed the instant Criminal Revision Petition before this Court as against the Judgment dated 02/11/2012 in S.T.C.No.219 of 2012 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam. Further, he has prayed...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:10. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL CRL.R.C.(MD)No.8 of 2013 R.Ramar ... Petitioner Vs State rep. by The Sub Inspector of Police Elanjemboor Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondent PRAYER Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 read with and 401 (1) of Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records pertaining the Judgment in C.C.No.304 of 2007 dated 26.05.2009 and set aside the observation of the Judicial Magistrate, Mudukulathur, Ramanathapuram District as acquittal on benefit of doubt and declare the petitioner as acquitted Honourably by allowing this Criminal Revision Petition. !For Petitioner ... Mr.P.Gunasekaran ^For Respondent ... Mr.P.Kandasamy, GA (Criminal Side) :ORDER The Petitioner/A2 has preferred the instant Criminal Revision Petition as against the Judgment dated 26.05.2009 in C.C.No.304 of 2007 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Mudukulathur. Further, the Revision Petitio...
Tag this Judgment!