Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:07.01.2013 Judgment pronounced on:01.02.2013 CRL.A. 665/2009 MEHBOOB AHMED Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S.K.Sethi, Advocate. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP. versus STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. By the impugned judgment, dated 18.05.2009, the appellant Mehboob Ahmed has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short), for the murder of Rumana Praveen on 30.12.2005 in their residence, at H.No. F-277 Gali No.14 Khajuri Khas, Delhi. The appellant has been sentenced to life imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-, in a default of which, he is to undergo simple imprisonment, for six months.2. The prosecution case is that on 30.12.2005, at around 10 a.m., the appellant, his step daughter- the deceased and Rubina Praveen (PW1), were present in his residence. Nasim Fatima (PW10), the mother of the d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Feb-01-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:01. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Appeal (MD).No.560 o1. Boopathy 2.Maruthu Pandian .. Appellants/Accused 1 & 2 vs. State by the Deputy Superintendent of Police Nanguneri, Cr.No.26 of 2004 of Thirukurungudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District. .. Respondent/Complainant Criminal appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code against the conviction and sentence passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District in his S.C.No.81 of 2004 dated 09.10.2007. !For appellants ... Mr.K.Prabhu ^For respondent ... Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J) The appellants are the accused in S.C.No.81 of 2004 on the file of the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. Altogether, there were four accused. The other two accused by name Sekar and Kum...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-01-2013
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh .....Criminal Appeal not D-595-DB of 2008 ....Date of decision:1.2.2013 Ram Brish Mehto ...Appellant v. State of Punjab ...Respondent ...Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble Mr.Justice Inderjit Singh ....Present: Mr.S.S.Tiwana, Advocate, Legal Aid Counsel for the appellant. Mr.B.S.Bhalla, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State.....Inderjit Singh, J. This appeal has been filed by appellant-Ram Brish Mehto against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 7.8.2008 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Nawanshahr, whereby he has been held guilty and convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as `IPC') and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for five months for the offence under Section 302 IPC. The brief facts of the prosecution ca...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-01-2013
Oral Judgment: (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.) : Rule, by consent made returnable forthwith. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents waive service on behalf of the respective Respondents. By consent, the Petitions are taken up for hearing and final disposal. 2. In this batch of Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution there is a challenge to a circular dated 1 January 2013 issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs. The circular issues directions to Chief Commissioners of Central Excise and Customs in regard to the procedure to be adopted for the recovery of outstanding demands in situations where an appeal is filed against the order of the adjudicating authority before the Commissioner (Appeals) or thereafter before the CESTAT, the High Court or the Supreme Court. The assessees are aggrieved by the stipulation which has now been brought into force, the effect of which is that though an application for stay of the recovery of the demand has been filed before...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on : Jan-31-2013
A.P. Lavande, J. 1] Confirmation Case No. 2/12 and Criminal Appeal No. 376/12 are being disposed of by common judgment since they arise out of judgment and order dated 30.5.2012 passed by Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge1, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No. 461/11 by which the appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 376/12 (hereinafter referred to as the accused) has been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 309 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to death and to pay a fine of Rs.3,00,000/- (Three Lakhs) and in default to suffer R.I. for five years for the offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code and to suffer R.I. for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.500/, in default to suffer S.I. for one month for the offence punishable under Section 309 of Indian Penal Code. Out of the fine amount if recovered, amount of Rs.2,50,000/- was ordered to be forwarded to the District Legal Aid Committee and Rs.50,000/to State of Maharashtra. 2] Briefly, the case of the prosecutio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2013 11TH MAGHA 193 Crl.MC.No. 694 of 2013 () ------------------------- CRIME NO. 2013/2012 OF PUNALUR POLICE STATION , KOLLAM. .............. PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4.----------------------------------------------------- 1. JIBIN, S/O.CHANDRA BABU, J.B. BHAVAN, SANTHARAM MUKKU, EDAMON VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK.2. NEJIM, S/O.SHOUKKATH ALI, NABEEL MANZIL, MUNDOOR NIRAPPATHU, PATHIRIKKAL, PATHANAPURAM TALUK.3. MUHAMMED KAMARUDEEN, S/O.RAHIM, K.K.P. HOUSE, CHEMMANTHOOR, PUNALUR VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK.4. SHAIJU, S/O.RAJU, PUTHIYATHOPPU, THONIKKADAVU, KARIYARA, VILAKKUDY VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.VINOY VARGHESE KALLUMOOTTILL. RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUNALUR POLICE ST...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. MANJULA CHELLUR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2013 11TH MAGHA 193 WP(C).No. 18753 of 2009 (L) --------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN CP.72/2006 of LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 07 09- 2007 PETITIONER(S): ----------------- THE COMMANDING OFFICER, INS DRONACHARYA,NAVAL BASE,COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPINATHA MENON, ADDL.CGSC RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,ERNAKULAM.2. SRI.A.J.CLEETUS, ANCHUTHAIKAL HOUSE, CHULLICKAL,KOCHI-682 005.3. SRI.V.RAJAGOPAL, GOSHREE NIKETHAN, M.B.LANE,CHERAI,KOCHI-682 001.4. SRI.A.S.RAJENDRAKUMAR, HOUSE NO.1/1647,AMARAVATHI,KOCHI-682 001.5. SRI.P.R.SABU, PERUMANA HOUSE,CHERAI P.O.,PIN-683 514. R2TO5 BY ADV. SRI.A.JAYASANKAR R2TO5 BY ADV. SRI.MANU GOVIND R2TO5 BY ADV. SMT.B.MEERA R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR ,ASST.S.G OF INDIA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVI...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 10TH MAGHA 193 WP(C).No. 24284 of 2008 (N) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- M/S. NOBLE TECH ENGINEERING (P) LTD., PALARIVATTOM,KOCHI-682 025, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, P.V.THOMAS. BY ADVS.SRI.K.L.VARGHESE SMT.SANTHA VARGHESE SRI.P.B.AJOY RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALABHAVAN,VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (SOUTHERN REGION), KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALABHAVAN,VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, P.H.CIRCLE,KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM.4. SRI. JOSEPH JOHN, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR (AQUA TECH), ANICADU,MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM. R1 TOR3 BY ADVS. SRI.GEORGE MATHEW, S.C., KERALA WATER AUTHORITY SRI.M.DINESH. R4 BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINAL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on : Jan-30-2013
Oral Judgment: (B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.) Admit. Heard finally by consent of the parties. Shri N.S. Khubalkar, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and Shri S.R. Bhongade, the learned Counsel waives notice on behalf of respondent No.2. 2. By this appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, the appellant-Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Nagpur has questioned the judgment dated 07th September, 2011 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No. 5121 of 2006. The learned Single Judge has dismissed the petition filed by the present appellant and upheld the order of the Industrial Court dated 17.12.2005 in Complaint (ULPN) No. 574 of 2002. The Industrial Court has found that the appellant-Market Committee has to pay subsistence allowance in accordance with the provisions of Clause 25 (5A) of Model Standing Orders framed under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 to its employee-respondent No.2. Th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 9TH MAGHA 193 Crl.MC.No. 626 of 2013 () ------------------------- CRIME NO. 739/2012 OF MUHAMMA POLICE STATION , ALAPPUZHA PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED : ------------------------------------ 1. HASEENA KABEER, W/O.V.P.KABEER, AGED 3 YEARS, CHAKKALAVELI MANNANCHERRY P.O.,ALAPPUZHA.2. NOUFAL, AGED 2 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL KHADER KUNJU ASAN KALATHIL PUTHENVEETTIL,MANNANCHERRY PANCHAYATH MANNANCHERRY P.O.,CHERTHALA,ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.ABDUL JALEEL.A RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT : ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM.2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUHAMMA POLICE STATION MUHAMMA P.O.,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. V.H. JASMINE THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: BP...
Tag this Judgment!