Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 28TH POUSHA 193 Con.Case(C).No. 1713 of 2007 (S) -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP.25157/2000 DATED 06 07-2007 PETITIONER)/PETITIONER: ------------------------ MR. AUGUSTINE M.J., S/O LATE JOSEPH, AGED 4 YEARS HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (MALAYALAM) P.H.S.A.P.T. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,KAKKOVV VAZHAYOOR P.O.,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,PIN-673 633. BY ADVS.SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN SMT.T.G.SEETHAL RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT: --------------------------- MR. KARTHIKEYAN, FATHER'S NAME & AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION HOUSING BOARD BUILDING,SANTHI NAGAR,TRIVANDRUM. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. NOBLE MATHEW SRI.T.K.M.UNNITHAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: jm Con.Case(C).No. 1713 of 2007 APPENDIX PETITION...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. MANJULA CHELLUR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 27TH POUSHA 193 O.P.(CAT).No.227 of 2013 (Z) ------------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN O.A.No.643/2012 DATED 12 10-2012 OF THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM BENCH. ---------------------- PETITIONER:- --------------------- SRUTHY P.S., AGED 2 YEARS, SREEPADMAM, ALAIKONAM, KULATHOOR, VENKADAMPU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 506. BY ADV. SRI.T.P.DEYANANTHAN. RESPONDENTS:- ---------------------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINSITRY OF DEFENCE, NEW DELHI.2. THE FLAG OFFICER COMMANDING IN CHIEF, SOUTHERN NAVAL COMMAND, NAVAL BASE, KOCHI 68 004.3. ADMINSITRATIVE OFFICER, STAFF OFFICER (CIVILIAN PERSONNNEL) OFFICE OF THE FLAF OFFICER COMMANDING IN CHIEF, SOUTHERN NAVAL COMMAND, NAVAL BASE, COCHIN 68 004.4. THE CENTR...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-17-2013
CWP No.3120 of 2012 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1 CWP No.3120 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision : January 17, 2013 Mohinder Singh .....Petitioner Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and others .....Respondents 2. CWP No.15350 of 2011 Vedvrit .....Petitioner Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and others .....Respondents 3. CWP No.20548 of 2011 Naresh Kumar .....Petitioner Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and another .....Respondents 4. CWP No.7057 of 2012 Dalbir Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents 5. CWP No.17103 of 2012 Raj Kumar .....Petitioner Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and others .....Respondents 6. CWP No.17181 of 2012 Joginder Singh Jangu .....Petitioner Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and others .....Respondents **** CWP No.3120 of 2012 (O&M) 2 CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH Present : Mr.Gaurav Bakshi, Advoc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi
Decided on : Jan-17-2013
Shri Kant Tripathi, Member (J) 1. In these three matters, common questions of law and facts are involved, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common order. 2. In the instant Original Applications filed under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, the applicants have claimed disability pension. 3. The relevant facts of each case are being narrated separately as follows: (i) OA No.130 of 2010: The applicant, Nandakumar. J.,No.769270 K, joined the Indian Air Force on 20.12.1994. He was found medically fit in the primary medical examination at the time of enrolment. During July 1998, while working at 153 Helicopter Unit, Udhampur in Jammu and Kashmir, he had reported to the unit medical authorities with complaints of diminished appetite and generalised weakness. He was referred to Command Hospital (NC) for the opinion of the Classified Specialist. Since he was showing the symptom of depression, he was referred to Psychiatrist and was diagnosed as a case of Schizophren...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 25/2011 % Reserved on: Date of Decision:9. h October16. h January, 2013 SANDEEP KUMAR SAHU ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sunil K. Mittal, Ms. Deepti Gupta, Mr. Kshitij Mittal, Mr. Saurabh Balwani and Mr. Anshul Mittal, Advocate. Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 243/2011 KAUSHAL @ BABLOO ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rajesh Tyagi, Advocate. Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG SANJIV KHANNA, J: Sandeep Kumar Sahu and Kaushal @ Babloo impugn their conviction, under Section 302, 397 and 506-II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and the sentences imposed upon them. They have been sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default of which they are to undergo simple imprisonment for one month, for the offence under Section 302 IPC, rigorous imp...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-16-2013
CRM No.30969 of 2012 in/and CRM-A No.400-MA of 2012 (O & M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM No.30969 of 2012 in/and CRM-A No.400-MA of 2012 (O & M) Date of decision :16. 1.2013 Zile Singh ........Applicant-appellant versus Smt. Neeta and another .......Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble Mr.Justice Inderjit Singh Present:- Mr.Jasmer Singh Rozera, Advocate, for Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the applicant-appellant --- Jasbir Singh, J. CRM No.30969 of 2012 After hearing counsel for the applicant, application is allowed. Delay of 48 days in filing the appeal stands condoned. CRM-A No.400-MA of 2012 This application has been filed under Section 378 (4) Cr.P.C.seeking leave to file an appeal against judgment dated 16.12.2011 acquitting both the respondents of the charges framed against them. The process of law was initiated on a criminal complaint made by the applicant/complainant against the respondents and one Raj Bala, qua whom ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-16-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 26TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 31523 of 2012 (M) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. MOUVANAL JANAKI, AGED 6 YEARS, W/O.KUTTAPPAN, PALAKKODE P.O., TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT.2. VATTAKANDI P.NIRMALA NAIR, D/O.VATTAKANDI MADHAVI AMMA, BHOOTHAN COLONY, PANAPPUZHA P.O., MATHAMANGALAM, KANNUR DISTRICT.3. VATTAKKANDI MADHAVI AMMA, W/O.NARAYANAN, PANAPPUZHA POST, TALIPARAMBA TALUK KANNUR DISTRICT.4. THEKKADAVAN NARAYANAN NAIR, S/O.NARAYANAN NAIR, PAYANNUR POST, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT.5. N.P.ABDULLA, S/O.MARIYUMMA, POST ETTIKKULAM, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT.6. T.P.CHANDRAN, POST PILIKKODE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGODE TALUK.7. KOONICHIRE NARAYANAN, S/O.KUNHAMBU, K.N.NIVAS, KUNDAYAMKOVVAL, KANKOL P.O., TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANUR DISTRICT.8. PUTHIYAPURAYIL BALAN, S/O.MANIKKAM, KOORKKARA, POST CHALAKKODE, TALIP...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jan-16-2013
1. This writ petition having been restored to its original number vide order of date passed on restoration application, as requested by learned counsel for the parties, it is taken up for hearing and is being decided finally. 2. Heard Sri K.K. Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 3. The executive authorities are supposed to execute policies of Government employing Rule of Law as laid down by Legislature and interpreted by this court. The incidental work which is also of equal importance is that those responsible for such execution must perform their job diligently, devotedly, honestly with ultimate goal of best public interest. Those who lack, should be made to suffer consequences. The later part, i.e., the consequences, ordinarily comes as a result of disciplinary proceedings conducted in accordance with Rules laying down procedure consistent with Article 311 of the Constitution and on the broad principle of administrative law....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 25TH POUSHA 193 CRP.NO. 21 OF 201.() ----------------------------------- C.M.APPEALNO.18/2012 OF SUB COURT, OTTAPPALAM IA NO.470/2012 IN OS.106/2012 OF MUNSIFF-MAGISTRATE COURT, PATTAMBI REVISION PETITIONER(S)/1ST APPELLANT/1ST RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOUFAL, S/O.KARIMBANAKKAL MUHAMMED, KUMARANELLUR AMSOM DESOM, P.O.KUMARANELLUR, OTTAPPALAM TALUK. BY ADVS.SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SENIOR ADVOCATE) SMT.M.M.DEEPA SRI.UNNI SEBASTIAN KAPPEN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/2ND PETITIONER/PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NOS.2, 3 & 4: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MOOSAKUTTY, S/O.LATE YAHU, VADAKKEKARA, KUMARANELLUR AMSOM DESOM, OTTAPPALAM TALUK-679552.2. JABIR, S/O.KARIMBANAKKAL KUNJUMARAKKAR, KUMARANELL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. MANJULA CHELLUR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 25TH POUSHA 193 W.A.No.75 of 2013 ----------------------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).11952/2012 DATED 05 12-2012) ------------------------------- APPELLANTS/ PETITIONERS 1 TO 6 & 8 IN WP(C):- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. INDANE DISTRIBUTORS FORUM, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY BABU VARGHESE, BABU GAS SERVICES, A.M.ROAD, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM.2. VENUGOPAL.A.T., INDANE DISTRIBUTOR, SUPER GAS AGENCY, PONEVAZHY ROAD, EDAPPALLY P.O.,ERNAKULAM.3. JAYAPRAKASH.K., INDANE DISTRIBUTOR, POOJA GAS, UNNICHIRA, KOCHI-21.4. GEORGE MATHEW, INDANE DISTRIBUTOR, MATHSONS GAS SERVICES, KOTHAMANGALAM 691. 5. T.B.MOHAN, INDANE DISTRIBUTOR, ARANI INDANE SERVICES, KOOTHATTUKULAM P.O., KOCHI 662. 6. CYRIAC KURIAKOSE, INDANE DISTRIBUTOR, RASMI GAS, T...
Tag this Judgment!