Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 20TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 30206 of 2011 (A) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- PETER, S/O.JOSEPH, PUNCHAPUTHUSSERIL, KIZHAKKAMBALAM VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.R.KRISHNAKUMAR (CHERTHALA) SMT.TINY THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. VILLAGE OFFICER, MULANTHURUTHY VILLAGE,MULANTHURUTHY P.O. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 314.2. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KANAYANNUR,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 011.3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD ERNAKULAM-682021.4. SUB REGISTRAR, MULANTHURUTHY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 314.5. THE DIRECTOR (VIGILANCE), P.M.G., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.6. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (VIGILANCE), ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, ERNAKULAM-682 011.7. VARGHESE, S/O. OUSEPH, CHAKYATHU HOUSE, MUKKANNOOR P.O., ALUVA TALUK PIN-683 577.8. SALINI, D/O.VARGHES...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 20TH POUSHA 193 CRL.A.No. 2659 of 2008 (B) -------------------------- SESSIONS CASE NO.296/01 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE - I, MAVELIKKARA. APPELLANT : ---------------- ANIL KUMAR, C.NO.3131, CENTRAL PRISON, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS.SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR SRI.K.JAGADEESH RESPONDENT: -------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTORSRI.P.R.RANJITH. THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.----------------------------------------------- Crl. Appeal No.2659 of 2008 ----------------------------------------------- Dated 10th January, 2013. JUDGMENT K.T.Sankaran, J.The first accused in Sessions Case No.296 of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 20TH POUSHA 193 MACA.No. 988 of 2012 (E) ----------------------- AGAINST THE AWARD DTD. 10.1.2012 IN OPMV.9/2009 OF M.A.C.T, OTTAPALAM. APPELLANT/1ST RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------- LAKSHMANAN, AGED 5 YEARS, S/O.RAMAN, ERAVATHODI THERUVU, P.O. KANIYARCODE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. (DRIVER-CUM-OWNER OF KED-5040 JEEP) BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 2 3 & 4: ------------------------------------------------------------- 1. JOMINA, AGED 4 YEARS, W/O.EBENEZAR NOBLE DAVID, PALATHARA HOUSE, THIRUVILWAMALA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT.2. THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD., OTTAPALAM BRANCH, P.O. OTTAPALAM - 690001, PALAKKAD DISTRICT (INSURER OF KED-5040 JEEP) POLICY NO.101203/31/07/02/0004031 POLICY VALID FROM 22 8.2007 TO 21.8.2008.3. SHAMEEJA, AGE NOT KNOWN, D/O.MOIDEENKUTTY, VADAKKEKALAM HOUSE, P.O. THIRUVILWAMALA, THRISSUR DIS...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 20TH POUSHA 193 TR.P(C).NO. 561 OF 201.() -------------------------------------- O.P. NO.1914 OF 2012.FAMILY COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- D.SONA, AGED 3 YEARS D/O.N.DEVARAJAN,BHAKTHANJALI,THYKOODAM CHURCH ROAD,VYTTILA P.O.,KOCHI 019. BY ADVS.SMT.LEKHA SURESH SRI.ASHOK SURESH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- DR.KIRAN BABU,, AGED 4 YEARS S/O.DR.KARUNAKARA BABU,HOUSE NO.716,KODIVILAKOM ULLOOR,PRASANTH NAGAR,MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 011. R1 BY ADV. SRI.SHAMMI VIJAYAN THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Tr.P(C) No.561 of 2012 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE-A1 TRUE COPY OF O.P. NO.1914 OF 201.OF THE FAMILY COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ANNEXURE-A2 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE NO.NCS/SC/MS DATED 10 12.2012 ISSUED B...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 20TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 7988 of 2011 (W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- JOSE JOSEPH, AGED 5 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH, MANAPPATT HOUSE, PARATHODU P.O., PODIMATTOM, KANJIRAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.NOBLE MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY OFFICER, KANJIRAPPALLY-686 507.2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM-686 001.3. THE MANAGER, CANARA BANK, KANJIRAPPALLY BRANCH-686507. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SHOBHA ANNAMMA EAPEN BY SRI.PAULY MATHEW MURICKEN,SC,CANARA BANK THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DSV/- WP(C).No. 7988 of 2011 (W) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 ON 14.07.2009 DEMANDING THE PAYMENT OF RS.13,22,291- TO THE PETITIONER. P2 COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE UNDER SECTION ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
CRA No.691-SB of 2001 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA No.691-SB of 2001 (O&M) Date of Decision :10. 01.2013 Satbir Singh & others ... Appellants versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Baldev Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Deepinder Singh, Advocate for the appellants. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Harish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the complainant. **** AJAY TEWARI, J.This appeal has been filed against the conviction of the appellants in FIR No.123 dated 18.05.1997 under Section 307, 326, 324, 323 and 34 IPC registered at Police Station Pilukhera District, Jind. The allegations are that the four appellants, who are the brothers attacked at the injured persons because of established previous enemity on 17.05.1997 at about 7.30 am when the complainant was going to his fields. As per the prosecution, appellant No.1 inflicted two injuries on the injured with a gandasa, one on his head and one on the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
CRR No.3998 of 2012 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CRR No.3998 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:10. 1.2013 Suresh Chander Aggarwal ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..........Respondent Coram: Hon'ble MRS.Justice Sabina Present: Mr.Balram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner....Sabina, J. Petitioner had faced trial in FIR No.63 dated 2.5.1999 under Sections 420,120-B of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (for short `IPC') along with other co-accused. Vide judgment/order dated 9.12.2010, Suresh Chander Aggarwal (petitioner).Jiwan Kumar Anand and Varinder Kochar were convicted and sentenced qua the commission of offence punishable under Section 420 IPC. The other co-accused of the petitioner, namely, Hem Lata, Poonam Prabhkar and Pardeep Kalia were acquitted of the charges framed against them. Aggrieved against the order of his conviction and sentence, petitioner preferred an appeal. The appellate Court, vide judgment dated 15.11.2011, dismissed the appeal filed ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-09-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. MANJULA CHELLUR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 19TH POUSHA 193 WA.No. 2201 of 2012 () IN WP(C).37792/2010 ------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C).37792/2010 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 14 09-2012 APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT: ------------------------ 1. S.MATHI S/O.SELLAPERUMAL ,NO 1 THILLAI NAGAR EXTN 10 F.T ROAD,KOLATHUR,CHENNAI-99 2. M RAMDAS S/O.NAGARAJ,NOBLE CARGO CARRIER,27 ADDIS STREET,GREY TOWN,COMBATORE 3 C SOMASUNDARAM S/O.A CHINNASWAMY,M/S.CSP LOGISTICS,962 CROSS CUT ROAD,GANDHIPURAM,COMBATORE-12 BY ADVS.SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR (SR.) SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA REP.BY THE SECRETARY,DEPARTMENT OF RAILWAYS RALI BHAVAN,NEW DELHI 2 THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER(COMMERCIAL) SOUTHERN RAILWAY,PALAKKAD DIVISION,PALAKKAD-678005 3. THE CHIEF TRAFFIC MANAGER...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 18TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 657 of 2013 (F) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- V.M.NOUFAL, GOLDEN FURNITURE INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT PLOT ATHIRAMPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.V.N.SUNIL KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KSEB, ATHIRAMPUZHA-686562.2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, KSEB, ETTUMANOOR-686631. BY SRI.JAICE JACOB,SC,KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 657/2013 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1 COPY OF SITE MAHAZAR DATED 5 12-2012. EXT.P2 COPY OF PROVISIONAL ASSESSMENT ORDER. EXT.P3 COPY OF PROVISIONAL BILL DATED 7 12-2012. EXT.P4 COPY OF OBJECTIONS DATED 12 12-12 FILED BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST THE PROVISIONAL ASSESSMENT ORDER. EXT.P4 COPY OF FINAL ASS...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-08-2013
T.S. Thakur, J. 1. This appeal arises out of a judgment and order dated 27th August, 2008 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital whereby Criminal Appeal No.298 of 2001 filed by the appellant has been partly allowed. The High Court has while setting aside the conviction and sentence awarded to the appellant under Section 302 IPC upheld his conviction for offences punishable under Sections 171, 201 and 420 IPC and the sentence awarded by the trial Court for these offences. The High Court has further convicted the appellant for an offence punishable under Section 365 IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years on that count. 2. The facts giving rise to the arrest and eventual conviction of the appellant have been set out by the High Court at length. We need not, therefore, recapitulate the same over again except to the extent it is absolutely necessary to do so for the disposal of this appeal. Suffice it to say that the appellant accordi...
Tag this Judgment!