Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: March 20, 2014 + CRL.A. 666/2009 VINOD @ CHAVANI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Jaideep Malik, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. Challenge in the present appeal is the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 16.01.2008, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge had convicted the appellant for the commission of offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life together with fine of Rs.5,000/- or in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month.2. The case of the prosecution in brief is reproduced as under:- On 14.02.2005. Constable Ashok Kumar, while posted at PS Mangolpuri, was on duty in F a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided On :20. 03.2014 + W.P.(C) 6224/2013 M/S GLYPH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. J.K. Mittal, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Mukesh Anand, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner challenges the decision of the Central Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) whereby it ruled that an appeal in respect of refund and rebate claims is not maintainable before it in view of Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act since it finds specific mention in Section 83 after its amendment in 2011.2. The facts briefly are that the petitioner is a service tax assessee. It made a refund claim in respect of service tax export turn-over. Aggrieved by an order refusing the refund, it preferred an appeal to the CESTAT under Section 86. The Tribunal by the order impugned in this case accepted the revenues cont...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. 03.2014 + CRL.A. 665/2010 ..... Appellant RAMU Through: Mr Rajender Chhabra, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms Ritu Gauba, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K. JAIN, J.(Oral) The case of the prosecution, as set out in the charge-sheet is as follows: On 20.02.2008, SI Sahib Singh of Police Station Timar Pur along with Constable Satbir was on patrol when the complainant got down from a bus in injured condition, accompanied by another injured, namely PW5. The statement of the complainant was recorded by the police officer who, inter alia, alleged that in the night intervening 19/20.02.2008, he along with PW5 was sleeping in the bus No.DL1A7801 At about mid night, 2-3 boys entered the bus and insisted on doing unnatural act with him. They had consumed liquor. When he resisted, one of the boys took out a knife and gave a knife blow on his right hand. When his companion PW5 intervened...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h March, 2014 + CRL.A. 923/2011 ARVIND KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Dimple Vivek, Advocate versus STATE + Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor Through: ..... Appellant Sh. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Advocate CRL.A. 927/2011 ROHIT TYAGI versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Challenge in these appeals is to the judgment dated 2 nd May, 2011 and order on sentence dated 7th May, 2011 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, North, Delhi in Sessions Case No.78/2010 arising out of FIR No.111/2009, PS Timarpur whereby both the appellants were convicted u/s 302/34 IPC and were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and were directed to pay a sum of Rs.1 lac each as fine, in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for thr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL.A. No.471/2003 Date of Decision:14. h March, 2014 + # ! CHARAN SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP AND % # ! CRL.A.No.555/2003 ASHOK @ LALA .....Appellant Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP AND % # ! CRL.A. No.781/2003 RADHEY SHYAM .....Appellant Through: Mr. Aman Nandrajog, Advocate versus $ THE STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP * CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. VAISH JUDGMENT P.K. BHASIN, J: By way of these appeals the three appellants have assailed the judgment dated 22nd April, 2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge holding all of them guilty of committing murder of one Raj Bansi on 17th May, 1999 as well as the order dated 14th May, 2003 whereby they have been directed to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs. 5,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL.A. No.471/2003 Date of Decision:14. h March, 2014 + # ! CHARAN SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP AND % # ! CRL.A.No.555/2003 ASHOK @ LALA .....Appellant Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP AND % # ! CRL.A. No.781/2003 RADHEY SHYAM .....Appellant Through: Mr. Aman Nandrajog, Advocate versus $ THE STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP * CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. VAISH JUDGMENT P.K. BHASIN, J: By way of these appeals the three appellants have assailed the judgment dated 22nd April, 2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge holding all of them guilty of committing murder of one Raj Bansi on 17th May, 1999 as well as the order dated 14th May, 2003 whereby they have been directed to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs. 5,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL.A. No.471/2003 Date of Decision:14. h March, 2014 + # ! CHARAN SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP AND % # ! CRL.A.No.555/2003 ASHOK @ LALA .....Appellant Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP AND % # ! CRL.A. No.781/2003 RADHEY SHYAM .....Appellant Through: Mr. Aman Nandrajog, Advocate versus $ THE STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP * CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. VAISH JUDGMENT P.K. BHASIN, J: By way of these appeals the three appellants have assailed the judgment dated 22nd April, 2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge holding all of them guilty of committing murder of one Raj Bansi on 17th May, 1999 as well as the order dated 14th May, 2003 whereby they have been directed to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs. 5,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DEATH SENTENCE REFERENCE NO.6/2013 STATE THROUGH REFERENCE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Madhav Khurana, Ms. Swati Goswami and Ms. Manvi Priya, Advocates. versus RAM SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate for Akshay Kumar and Vinay Sharma. Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate for Mukesh and Pawan Kumar Gupta. + CRL. APP. NO.1398/2013 PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA Through: versus STATE Through: + ..... Appellant Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate. ..... Respondent Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Madhav Khurana, Ms. Swati Goswami and Ms. Manvi Priya, Advocates. CRL. APP. NO.1399/2013 MUKESH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Madhav Khurana, Ms. Swati Goswami and Ms. Manvi Priya, Advocates. DEATH SENTENCE REFERENCE NO.6/2013, + CRL. APP. NO.1414/2013 VINAY SHARMA AND AN...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : October 07, 2013 DECIDED ON : March 13, 2014 + CRL.A. 358/2006 P.P.SINGH Through : ..... Appellant Mr.R.N.Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Puneet Mittal, Mr.Ankit Goyal, Mr.Ankur Aggarwal & Mr.Nitin Sharma, Advocates. Versus C.B.I. Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Manoj Ohri, Spl.P.P. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. legality Dr.P.P.Singh (Prem Pal Singh-the appellant) challenges the and correctness of a judgment dated 06.05.2006 in R.C.No.79(A)/96/CBI/ACB/N.Delhi, CC No.133/01 of learned Special Judge, Delhi by which he was held guilty under Section 7 and 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short PC Act). By an order on sentence dated 08.05.2006, he was awarded rigorous imprisonment for five years with fine `5,000/- under Section 7 and rigorous imprisonment for five years with fine `7,000/- under Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of PC Act. Both the substantive sentences were...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-11-2014
$~R-130 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: March 11, 2014 + W.P.(C) 5548/2003 MADAN SINGH BISHTA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil Gautam, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Anjana Gosain, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Desodiya, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The charge at which petitioner, working as a Constable with BSF, was tried at a General Security Force Court was for having committed an offence punishable under Section 302 IPC, in that, near village Thana Basti, PS : Khowai, District Tripura (West) on June 25, 1999 around 19:30 hours he caused the death of Sh.Lalit Deb Barma by firing a shot from his 7.62 mm SLR Butt No.325, Registration No.BC-9989.2. The finding of the Court is that the petitioner was guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder punishable under Section 304 Part I IPC and the sentence imposed is to undergo RI for...
Tag this Judgment!