Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 03, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November10, 2014 % + CRL.A. 804/2014 SUNIL @ BABU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.P.S.Pradhan, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with Inspector Yashpal Singh, Crime Branch and SI Gorav. Mr.Rajeev Nanda, Advocate for deceaseds father. CRL.A. 854/2014 VINOD @ VINODI Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Nandita Rao, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with Inspector Yashpal Singh, Crime Branch and SI Gorav. Mr.Rajeev Nanda, Advocate for deceaseds father. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Sunil @ Babu and Vinod @ Vinodi have been convicted for the offence of murder of Jitender vide impugned judgment dated March 26, 2014 and directed to undergo imprisonment for life.2. Learned counsels for the appellants assa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 03, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November10, 2014 % + CRL.A. 804/2014 SUNIL @ BABU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.P.S.Pradhan, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with Inspector Yashpal Singh, Crime Branch and SI Gorav. Mr.Rajeev Nanda, Advocate for deceaseds father. CRL.A. 854/2014 VINOD @ VINODI Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Nandita Rao, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with Inspector Yashpal Singh, Crime Branch and SI Gorav. Mr.Rajeev Nanda, Advocate for deceaseds father. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Sunil @ Babu and Vinod @ Vinodi have been convicted for the offence of murder of Jitender vide impugned judgment dated March 26, 2014 and directed to undergo imprisonment for life.2. Learned counsels for the appellants assa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-05-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 11.2014 CM96872014 in W.P.(C) 1971/2014 BAYER CORPORATION ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Advocate with Mr Sanjay Kumar, Ms Arpita Sawhney and Mr Arun Kumar. For the Respondents : Mr Riput Daman S. Bhardwaj, CGSC and Mr T.P. Singh for UOI. Mr Mukesh Anand with Ms Sonia Sharma, Mr V.C. Jha for R-2 to 4 Customs Department. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 This is an application filed on behalf of respondent no.5 (hereafter referred to as NPL) inter alia praying for permission to export 1 kg. of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (hereafter API) Sorafenib for the purposes of conducting development/clinical studies and trials. The said application was necessitated because of an interim order dated 26.03.2014 passed by this Court whereby respondent nos. 1 to 4 were directed to ensure ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 15, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 03, 2014 % + CRL.A.781/2011 AFZAL SHA @ SURAJ ALI ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Ms.Neha Singh, Ms.Pankhuri Mehndiratta, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Kashmere Gate CRL.A. 784/2011 AJAY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Ms.Neha Singh, Ms.Pankhuri Mehndiratta, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Kashmere Gate CRL.A. 1270/2013 SONU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: CRL.A.No.781/2011 & conn.matters ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Page 1 of 11 Kashmere Gate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 15, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 03, 2014 % + CRL.A.781/2011 AFZAL SHA @ SURAJ ALI ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Ms.Neha Singh, Ms.Pankhuri Mehndiratta, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Kashmere Gate CRL.A. 784/2011 AJAY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Ms.Neha Singh, Ms.Pankhuri Mehndiratta, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Kashmere Gate CRL.A. 1270/2013 SONU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: CRL.A.No.781/2011 & conn.matters ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Page 1 of 11 Kashmere Gate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 15, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 03, 2014 % + CRL.A.781/2011 AFZAL SHA @ SURAJ ALI ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Ms.Neha Singh, Ms.Pankhuri Mehndiratta, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Kashmere Gate CRL.A. 784/2011 AJAY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Ms.Neha Singh, Ms.Pankhuri Mehndiratta, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Kashmere Gate CRL.A. 1270/2013 SONU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: CRL.A.No.781/2011 & conn.matters ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Page 1 of 11 Kashmere Gate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-31-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : October 31, 2014 + CRL.A. 299/2012 RIYAZ KHAN @ GAINDA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Manoj Singh with Mr. Abhay Singh, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp. Naresh Kumar, Insp. Spl. Staff (North). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Believing the testimony of Suresh Kumar PW-1 and accepting that the knife Ex.P-2 was got recovered pursuant to the disclosure statement made by appellant Riyaz Khan, which knife when sent for the opinion of Dr.Vijay Dhankar PW-22 was opined as capable of inflicting the three injuries on deceased Sunil and additionally capable of causing the cut marks on a vest and a shirt worn by the deceased when he was assaulted, the learned trial Judge has opined vide impugned judgment dated December 14, 2010 that the prosecution has successfully established that Riyaz K...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : September 11, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : October 13, 2014 + FAO(OS) 389/2014 M/S. SOUTH INDIA BEVERAGES PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Pratibha M.Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Saurabh S.Sinha, Ms.Jaya Manddia and Mr.Sanchit Aggarwal, Advocates versus GENERAL MILLS MARKETING INC. & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Anuradha Salhotra, Advocate with Mr.Sumit Wadhwa and Mr.Tushar A.John, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Appellant the defendant in the suit, assails the order dated July 23, 2014, allowing the application filed by the respondent - plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure granting an interim injunction against the appellant restraining the appellant from using the mark DDAAZS or any other mark deceptively similar to that of the respondent - plaintiffs trade mark HAAGEN-DAZ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-29-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h September, 2014 % + FAO (OS) No.205/2013 MINU CHIBBER & ORS. Through: .. Appellants Mr. D.P. Singh with Ms. Sonam Gupta, Mr. Rajkiran Vats, Mr. Salil Bhattacharya & Mr. R.P. Vyas, Advs. Versus LT. COL. (RETD.) S.S. CHIBBER .. Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Goel & Ms. Gausia Shah, Advs. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This appeal under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 impugns the order dated 15th March, 2013 (of the learned Single Judge of this Court exercising Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction in CS(OS) No.2521/2010 filed by the respondent / plaintiff) of dismissal of IA No.7092/2011 filed by the appellants / defendants under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and vide ex parte ad-interim order dated 22nd April, 2013 which continues to be in force, the proceedings in the suit before the learned Single Judge were stayed. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-22-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :9. h September, 2014 Judgment pronounced on:22. d September, 2014 % + I.A. No.14725/2014 & I.A. No.16523/2014 in CS(OS) No.2357/2014 V2 CORP & ANR. Through Plaintiffs Mr.Sudhir Chandra Sr. Adv. with Mr. Chetan Chadha & Mr. Sharabh Srivastava, Advs. versus INNOVATIVE TECHPACK LIMITED Through Defendant Mr. C.M.Lall, Adv. with Ms. Nancy Roy, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present suit for permanent injunction, infringement of designs, damages and delivery etc. has been filed by the plaintiff against the defendant in respect of design No.221746 registered as of 17th March, 2009 and design No.253936 registered as of 17th May, 2013. Alongwith the suit, plaintiffs also filed an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC being I.A. 14725/2014.2. The suit alongwith said interim application was listed before Court on 8th August, 2014. After hearing, detailed ex-parte ord...
Tag this Judgment!