Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL.A. No.471/2003 Date of Decision:14. h March, 2014 + # ! CHARAN SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP AND % # ! CRL.A.No.555/2003 ASHOK @ LALA .....Appellant Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP AND % # ! CRL.A. No.781/2003 RADHEY SHYAM .....Appellant Through: Mr. Aman Nandrajog, Advocate versus $ THE STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP * CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. VAISH JUDGMENT P.K. BHASIN, J: By way of these appeals the three appellants have assailed the judgment dated 22nd April, 2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge holding all of them guilty of committing murder of one Raj Bansi on 17th May, 1999 as well as the order dated 14th May, 2003 whereby they have been directed to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs. 5,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL.A. No.471/2003 Date of Decision:14. h March, 2014 + # ! CHARAN SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP AND % # ! CRL.A.No.555/2003 ASHOK @ LALA .....Appellant Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP AND % # ! CRL.A. No.781/2003 RADHEY SHYAM .....Appellant Through: Mr. Aman Nandrajog, Advocate versus $ THE STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP * CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. VAISH JUDGMENT P.K. BHASIN, J: By way of these appeals the three appellants have assailed the judgment dated 22nd April, 2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge holding all of them guilty of committing murder of one Raj Bansi on 17th May, 1999 as well as the order dated 14th May, 2003 whereby they have been directed to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs. 5,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL.A. No.471/2003 Date of Decision:14. h March, 2014 + # ! CHARAN SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP AND % # ! CRL.A.No.555/2003 ASHOK @ LALA .....Appellant Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP AND % # ! CRL.A. No.781/2003 RADHEY SHYAM .....Appellant Through: Mr. Aman Nandrajog, Advocate versus $ THE STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP * CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. VAISH JUDGMENT P.K. BHASIN, J: By way of these appeals the three appellants have assailed the judgment dated 22nd April, 2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge holding all of them guilty of committing murder of one Raj Bansi on 17th May, 1999 as well as the order dated 14th May, 2003 whereby they have been directed to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs. 5,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DEATH SENTENCE REFERENCE NO.6/2013 STATE THROUGH REFERENCE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Madhav Khurana, Ms. Swati Goswami and Ms. Manvi Priya, Advocates. versus RAM SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate for Akshay Kumar and Vinay Sharma. Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate for Mukesh and Pawan Kumar Gupta. + CRL. APP. NO.1398/2013 PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA Through: versus STATE Through: + ..... Appellant Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate. ..... Respondent Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Madhav Khurana, Ms. Swati Goswami and Ms. Manvi Priya, Advocates. CRL. APP. NO.1399/2013 MUKESH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Madhav Khurana, Ms. Swati Goswami and Ms. Manvi Priya, Advocates. DEATH SENTENCE REFERENCE NO.6/2013, + CRL. APP. NO.1414/2013 VINAY SHARMA AND AN...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : October 07, 2013 DECIDED ON : March 13, 2014 + CRL.A. 358/2006 P.P.SINGH Through : ..... Appellant Mr.R.N.Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Puneet Mittal, Mr.Ankit Goyal, Mr.Ankur Aggarwal & Mr.Nitin Sharma, Advocates. Versus C.B.I. Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Manoj Ohri, Spl.P.P. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. legality Dr.P.P.Singh (Prem Pal Singh-the appellant) challenges the and correctness of a judgment dated 06.05.2006 in R.C.No.79(A)/96/CBI/ACB/N.Delhi, CC No.133/01 of learned Special Judge, Delhi by which he was held guilty under Section 7 and 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short PC Act). By an order on sentence dated 08.05.2006, he was awarded rigorous imprisonment for five years with fine `5,000/- under Section 7 and rigorous imprisonment for five years with fine `7,000/- under Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of PC Act. Both the substantive sentences were...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-11-2014
$~R-130 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: March 11, 2014 + W.P.(C) 5548/2003 MADAN SINGH BISHTA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil Gautam, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Anjana Gosain, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Desodiya, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The charge at which petitioner, working as a Constable with BSF, was tried at a General Security Force Court was for having committed an offence punishable under Section 302 IPC, in that, near village Thana Basti, PS : Khowai, District Tripura (West) on June 25, 1999 around 19:30 hours he caused the death of Sh.Lalit Deb Barma by firing a shot from his 7.62 mm SLR Butt No.325, Registration No.BC-9989.2. The finding of the Court is that the petitioner was guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder punishable under Section 304 Part I IPC and the sentence imposed is to undergo RI for...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-10-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:10. 03.2014 + ITA672001 M/S COMFORT LIVING HOTELS P. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Prakash Kumar with Mr. Sheel Vardhan, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Pabitra Roy Choudhary, Jr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. The following questions of law arise for consideration: (1) Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the sum of Rs. 5 lacs was capital in nature and was not revenue expenditure that could properly be deducted?. (2) Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that no depreciation was allowable on a sum of Rs.3,59,803/claimed as expenditure on temporary constructions?.2. Briefly, the facts are that the assessee was carrying on hospitality business, i.e., managing a hotel. It had claimed during the relevant time in...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:10. h March, 2014 + CRL.A. 1345/2011 MOHD. SHAHID KHAN @ RAJA ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 20 th April, 2011 and order on sentence dated 2nd May, 2011 passed in Sessions Case No.77/2009 in case FIR No.109/2009, PS Kapashera whereby the appellant was held guilty of offence u/s 302 IPC and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay Rs.10,000/- as fine and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo SI for four months.2. Prosecution case emanates from the fact that on 17 th May, 2009, on receipt of a call regarding murder of a male aged about 2025 years at Gali No.8, Kapashera near Govt. Garbage House, near White Flats, New Delhi, PW13, W Constable Sudesh filled the PCR form...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on : Mar-07-2014
S.A. Siddiqui, Member (Judicial): 1) Complainant Sh. Anil Khanna has filed this complaint against the OP for return of Rs.8,01,000/- received from the complainant by the respondent for providing agreed services but committed gross deficiency of service, compensation of Rs.25,00,000/- for mental agony, pain and harassment etc. and litigation cost of Rs.1,00,000/-. 2) The marriage ceremony of complainants daughter was scheduled to be solemnized on 06.05.2011 following which the complainant decided to engage the services of respondent company which represented to have immense market reputation in providing works of painting, props, accessories, floral, fabric and linen and other related works including generators and lighting. The respondent promised to make various wedding functions such as Bhajan Sandhya (on 29.04.2011), Sagan (on 04.05.2011) Mehndi/Ladies Sangeet (on 05.05.2011) and finally wedding ceremony on 06.05.2011, a resounding success and memorable. Accordingly Mr. Vikas Gututi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-06-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:6. h March, 2014. % + CS (OS) 1493/2013 THE COCA COLA COMPANY & ANR .......Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Ekta Sarin Versus NARSING RAO & ORS .....Defendants Through: None CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit ( on 29 th July, 2013) claiming permanent injunction restraining the defendant from manufacturing or authorising the manufacture, selling or offering for sale, marketing, advertising, promoting, displaying or in any other manner whatsoever using the offending trademarks KELBY and/or KELBY Club Soda (label) and/or KELBY bottled water (label) and/or the offending bottle shape and/or any other mark which is deceptively or confusingly similar to the registered trademarks KINLEY Club Soda (label), KINLEY (label), KINLEY (word) and DANUBE Bottle shape of the Plaintiff No.1, as a trademark or part of a trademark, trade name or part of a trade name or in any other manner whatsoever so as to...
Tag this Judgment!