Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-22-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :16. h DECEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :22. d JANUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 768/2000 MADAN LAL Through : ....Appellant Mr.Jitendra Sethi, Advocate with Mr.Rajesh Kaushik & Mr.Hemendra Jailia, Advocates. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY) OF DELHI .Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Madan Lal (the appellant) questions the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 17.11.2000 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.499/96 arising out of FIR No.214/85 PS Subzi Mandi by which he was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 307 IPC. By an order dated 23.11.2000, he was awarded RI for three years with fine ` 5,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 29.04.1985 at about 09.45 P.M. in front of house No.10621, Gali No.6, Andha Mugal, he inflicted injuries to Tara Chand in an attempt to murder him. During the course of investigatio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. t January, 2014 + CRL.A. 712/2011 ILYASUDDIN Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anu Narula, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. It is stated that human lust knows no bounds-if there is any truth in it, the present case is a glaring example of such lust. A tiny tot aged about 2-1/2 years has not only fallen a victim of the lust of the appellant but also lost his precious life resulting in conviction of the appellant u/s 377/302 IPC in Sessions Case No.134/2008 u/s 377/302 IPC, P.S. Kapashera and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of 10 years for offence punishable u/s 377 IPC and for imprisonment of life for offence punishable u/s 302 IPC and further directions not to release him before the expiry of 25 years. However, benefit of Section 428 Cr.P.C was given to him.2. Succinctly s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :9. h DECEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :16. h JANUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 397/2003 GULSHAN SHARMA & ORS. ....Appellants Through : Mr.R.K.Thakur, Advocate with Mr.B.Mishra, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Gulshan Sharma (A-1), Harish Sharma (A-2) and Kamni Sharma (A-3) challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 03.03.2003 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.41/00 arising out of FIR No.543/00 PS Rajouri Garden whereby they were convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 307/34 IPC. By an order on sentence dated 05.03.2003, they were awarded RI for five years with fine ` 5,000/-, each. The prosecution case as projected in the charge-sheet is as follows :2. On 01.06.2000, Rajeev Taneja had gone at the residence of the accused persons to demand payment which A-1 had failed to pay being member of the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on : Apr-01-2014
1. The above applications were filed in NGT against the proposed widening of sectoral roads involving cutting of number of trees in front of National Media Centre (NMC). The Project Proponents stated to be involved in the project are Haryana Development Authority (HUDA) and DLF Ltd. The main contention of the applicants is that there will be significant air and noise pollution problems due to movement of traffic in the area due to cutting of trees which were acting as a buffer and reducing noise and dust pollution. Incidentally, an email was received by NGT from Haryali Welfare Society addressed to the Hon'ble Chief Minister of Haryana and the Copy was sent to NGT raising the similar issues pertaining to the cutting of trees by DLF/HUDA, which was treated as an Application no. 120/2013. Regarding this Application No. 120/2013, NGT passed the order restraining the Respondents from cutting/felling or uprooting any tree on the site in question on 2/08/2013. Besides these two applications,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-28-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: February 28, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: March 28, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 131/2013 ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANR ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Prashant Bhusan and Mr.Pranav Sachdeva, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.L.Nageshwar Rao and Mr.Rajeev Mehra, ASG with Mr.Sumeet Pushkarna, CGSC, Ms.Aditi Mohan, Ms.Sara Sundaram, Mr.Aditya Malhotra, Mr.D.Abhinav Rao, Mr.Mayank Pandey and Mr.Girish Kosaraju, Advocates for UOI. Mr.P.R.Chopra, Advocate for R-2. Mr.V.P.Singh, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.K.C.Mittal, Ms.Ruchika Mittal and Mr.M.I.Choudhury, Advocate for R-3. Ms.Pinky Anand, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Sybhashish Soren, Mr.Anil Soni and Mr.Aayush Chandra, Advocates for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Filed in public interest, the petitioner asserts that there is a blatant violation ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-25-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. h March, 2014 % + CS(OS) 3137/2012 PFIZER PRODUCTS, INC THROUGH: Mr.Sahil Sethi, Advocate ..Plaintiff VERSUS R.K. SINGH & ANR THROUGH: None ..Defendants CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, passing off, rendition of accounts, delivery up and damages. Summons were issued in the suit on 19.10.2012, 02.01.2013, 25.02.2013 and on 19.07.2013. The plaintiff is aggrieved by use of the mark VIHAGRA by defendants. Despite service, none appeared on behalf of the defendants and they were accordingly proceeded ex parte on 15.01.2014.2. The plaintiff has filed affidavit by way of evidence of Mr. Samir Kazi (PW1), which is exhibited as Ex. PW-1/A. PW1 has deposed that he holds Power of Attorney from plaintiff in his favour and the same is exhibited as Ex. PW-1/1.3. Mr. Samir Kazi, PW1 has deposed tha...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: March 24, 2014 + CRL.A. 316/1998 NARESH GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. Challenge in the present appeal is the impugned judgment dated and order on sentence dated 30.07.1998 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby the appellant has been held guilty for committing an offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment together with fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, the appellant was directed to further undergo RI for a period of six months.2. The case of the prosecution in brief, can be summarized as under:On 24.06.1984 at about 6.55 p.m., SI Ashutosh was handed over a copy of the DD Report...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: March 20, 2014 + CRL.A. 666/2009 VINOD @ CHAVANI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Jaideep Malik, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. Challenge in the present appeal is the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 16.01.2008, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge had convicted the appellant for the commission of offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life together with fine of Rs.5,000/- or in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month.2. The case of the prosecution in brief is reproduced as under:- On 14.02.2005. Constable Ashok Kumar, while posted at PS Mangolpuri, was on duty in F a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided On :20. 03.2014 + W.P.(C) 6224/2013 M/S GLYPH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. J.K. Mittal, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Mukesh Anand, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner challenges the decision of the Central Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) whereby it ruled that an appeal in respect of refund and rebate claims is not maintainable before it in view of Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act since it finds specific mention in Section 83 after its amendment in 2011.2. The facts briefly are that the petitioner is a service tax assessee. It made a refund claim in respect of service tax export turn-over. Aggrieved by an order refusing the refund, it preferred an appeal to the CESTAT under Section 86. The Tribunal by the order impugned in this case accepted the revenues cont...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h March, 2014 + CRL.A. 923/2011 ARVIND KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Dimple Vivek, Advocate versus STATE + Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor Through: ..... Appellant Sh. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Advocate CRL.A. 927/2011 ROHIT TYAGI versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Challenge in these appeals is to the judgment dated 2 nd May, 2011 and order on sentence dated 7th May, 2011 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, North, Delhi in Sessions Case No.78/2010 arising out of FIR No.111/2009, PS Timarpur whereby both the appellants were convicted u/s 302/34 IPC and were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and were directed to pay a sum of Rs.1 lac each as fine, in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for thr...
Tag this Judgment!