Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-06-2014
..... on the cot. the eldest son of sarla aged 20 years had slept on the roof. further deposition of pw-3 being that sarla and her husband were talking in nepali language and after that they both smoked cigarettes. later on sarla came and slept with pw-3 on the floor. after half an hour, dhan bahadur came to the floor .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-30-2014
..... named laxmi and sheela lived nearby and laxmi had an issue with rajbala concerning rajbala spreading in the neighbourhood that she had seen laxmi in a compromising position with a nepali boy. that apart, before asi om prakash entered the scene, the first police personnel to have met rajbala was ct.ramesh pw-22, on duty at the casualty of ..... deposed that sunita was her elder sister. her mother s name was rajbala. she knew laxmi and sheela. her mother had seen laxmi in a compromising position with a nepali boy and this was the reason for the strained relationship between her mother and laxmi. on september 20, 1995 she and her sisters sunita and shyama were in their house ..... she knew the accused since they were distantly related to them. her mother rajbala had strained relations with laxmi because she had seen laxmi in a compromising position with a nepali boy. she deposed that on september 20, 1995 she was present in her house at 1:45 pm and so was her sister and her brother. laxmi and sheela .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-01-2014
..... under sections 392/394/302 read with section 34 of the ipc by the judgment dated 4th march, 2010. however the other two accused, namely raj kumar and monu thappa @ nepali were given the benefit of doubt for the reason that no incriminating article had been recovered from them or at their instance and hence no role could be attributed to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-01-2014
..... under sections 392/394/302 read with section 34 of the ipc by the judgment dated 4th march, 2010. however the other two accused, namely raj kumar and monu thappa @ nepali were given the benefit of doubt for the reason that no incriminating article had been recovered from them or at their instance and hence no role could be attributed to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-01-2014
..... under sections 392/394/302 read with section 34 of the ipc by the judgment dated 4th march, 2010. however the other two accused, namely raj kumar and monu thappa @ nepali were given the benefit of doubt for the reason that no incriminating article had been recovered from them or at their instance and hence no role could be attributed to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :9. h DECEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :16. h JANUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 397/2003 GULSHAN SHARMA & ORS. ....Appellants Through : Mr.R.K.Thakur, Advocate with Mr.B.Mishra, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Gulshan Sharma (A-1), Harish Sharma (A-2) and Kamni Sharma (A-3) challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 03.03.2003 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.41/00 arising out of FIR No.543/00 PS Rajouri Garden whereby they were convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 307/34 IPC. By an order on sentence dated 05.03.2003, they were awarded RI for five years with fine ` 5,000/-, each. The prosecution case as projected in the charge-sheet is as follows :2. On 01.06.2000, Rajeev Taneja had gone at the residence of the accused persons to demand payment which A-1 had failed to pay being member of the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. t January, 2014 + CRL.A. 712/2011 ILYASUDDIN Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anu Narula, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. It is stated that human lust knows no bounds-if there is any truth in it, the present case is a glaring example of such lust. A tiny tot aged about 2-1/2 years has not only fallen a victim of the lust of the appellant but also lost his precious life resulting in conviction of the appellant u/s 377/302 IPC in Sessions Case No.134/2008 u/s 377/302 IPC, P.S. Kapashera and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of 10 years for offence punishable u/s 377 IPC and for imprisonment of life for offence punishable u/s 302 IPC and further directions not to release him before the expiry of 25 years. However, benefit of Section 428 Cr.P.C was given to him.2. Succinctly s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-22-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :16. h DECEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :22. d JANUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 768/2000 MADAN LAL Through : ....Appellant Mr.Jitendra Sethi, Advocate with Mr.Rajesh Kaushik & Mr.Hemendra Jailia, Advocates. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY) OF DELHI .Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Madan Lal (the appellant) questions the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 17.11.2000 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.499/96 arising out of FIR No.214/85 PS Subzi Mandi by which he was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 307 IPC. By an order dated 23.11.2000, he was awarded RI for three years with fine ` 5,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 29.04.1985 at about 09.45 P.M. in front of house No.10621, Gali No.6, Andha Mugal, he inflicted injuries to Tara Chand in an attempt to murder him. During the course of investigatio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-23-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: January 23, 2014 + CS(OS) No.2617/2010 MOTHER DAIRY FRUIT & VEGETABLE PVT. LTD...... Plaintiff Through Mr.Aman Taneja, Advocate versus DHARA DAIRY FOODS CO. ..... Respondent Through Defendant is ex-parte CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The defendant is ex-parte. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff, Mother Diary Fruit and Vegetable Pvt. Ltd, for permanent injunction, restraining infringement of trademark, copyright, passing off, damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc. against the defendant.2. It is the case of the plaintiff that it is the registered proprietor of the well known trademark DHARA and has various registrations for the said mark under Class 29. The details of the said registrations in respect of the mark DHARA have been given in Para 13 of the plaint. Some of them are: registration in respect of DHARA Refined Vegetable Oil under class 29 bearing registration N...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.383/1998 Reserved on:10. h January, 2014 Date of Decision:24. h January, 2014 % CHANDER PAL SINGH ..... Appellant Through Mr. K.B. Andley, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate. Versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.450/1998 ANGREJ SINGH ..... Appellant Through Mr. L.K. Passi, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J.: The appellants Chander Pal Singh and Angrej Singh by the impugned judgment dated 19th August, 1998 stand convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) for murder of Harvinder Kataria on 13th May, 1994 at about 9.30 P.M. According to the prosecution, Chander Pal Singh had inflicted injury on the chest of the deceased with a kripan, while Angrej Singh, the conductor restrained h...
Tag this Judgment!