Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-26-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 500/2019 ROHIT STATE Through Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Equebal Nasir and Mr. Naahid Nasir, Advocates. versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Ranjan, SI Jasmes Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. Mr. Kuber Giri with Mr. Sarvpreet Singh Chawla, Advocates for Victim-Complainant. WITH CRL.A. 504/2019 SHIV KUMAR @ SHIBU ..... Appellant Through Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate with Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Equebal Nasir and Mr. Naahid Nasir, Advocates. STATE versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Ranjan, SI Jasmes Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. Mr. Kuber Giri with Mr. Sarvpreet Singh Chawla, Advocates for Victim-Complainant. WITH Page 1 of 49 Crl.A.500/2019 & Ors. + CRL.A. 819/2019 SUNIL alias ANNU ..... Appellant Through Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate with Mr. Mohit B., Advocate versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-26-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 500/2019 ROHIT STATE Through Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Equebal Nasir and Mr. Naahid Nasir, Advocates. versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Ranjan, SI Jasmes Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. Mr. Kuber Giri with Mr. Sarvpreet Singh Chawla, Advocates for Victim-Complainant. WITH CRL.A. 504/2019 SHIV KUMAR @ SHIBU ..... Appellant Through Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate with Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Equebal Nasir and Mr. Naahid Nasir, Advocates. STATE versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Ranjan, SI Jasmes Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. Mr. Kuber Giri with Mr. Sarvpreet Singh Chawla, Advocates for Victim-Complainant. WITH Page 1 of 49 Crl.A.500/2019 & Ors. + CRL.A. 819/2019 SUNIL alias ANNU ..... Appellant Through Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate with Mr. Mohit B., Advocate versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-26-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 500/2019 ROHIT STATE Through Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Equebal Nasir and Mr. Naahid Nasir, Advocates. versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Ranjan, SI Jasmes Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. Mr. Kuber Giri with Mr. Sarvpreet Singh Chawla, Advocates for Victim-Complainant. WITH CRL.A. 504/2019 SHIV KUMAR @ SHIBU ..... Appellant Through Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate with Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Equebal Nasir and Mr. Naahid Nasir, Advocates. STATE versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Ranjan, SI Jasmes Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. Mr. Kuber Giri with Mr. Sarvpreet Singh Chawla, Advocates for Victim-Complainant. WITH Page 1 of 49 Crl.A.500/2019 & Ors. + CRL.A. 819/2019 SUNIL alias ANNU ..... Appellant Through Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate with Mr. Mohit B., Advocate versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-07-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :02. 08.2019 Date of decision:07. 08.2019 W.P.(C) 10933/2018, CM APPL. 33734/2019, CM APPL.42590/2018, CM APPL. 33735/2019 DEEPANSHU BHADORIYA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sidharth Gupta, Ms. Prerna Priyadarshini & Mr. Somay Kapoor, Advocates. versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Michelle, Ms.Puja Sarkar, Ms. Arunima, Ms.Sumangla & Mr. Tarun Verma, Advocates for MCI. Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Advocate for R- 2 & 3. Mr. Nishit Agrawal & Mr. Harsh Mishra, Advocates for R-4. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Mr. Raghav Nagar, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioners namely Deepanshu Bhadoriya, Wadhwani Ashwin Ramesh, Aditi Pathak, Rahul Soni and Sneha Kumari participated in the W.P. (C) 10933/2018 Page 1 of 75 CBSE conducted NEET for UG medical courses in the year 2016 and state that they were eligible and qualifi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-30-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: Pronounced on:30. 09.2019 27.09.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 2270/2019 & Crl.M.A. 36692/2019 P. CHIDAMBARAM ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Kapil Sibal, Mr.Abhishek Manu Singhavi, Mr.Salman Khurshid, Mr.Vivek Tankha, Mr.A.S. Chandiok, Mr.N. Hari Haran, Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advs. with Mr.Arshdeep Singh Khurana, Mr.Kunal Vajani, Mr.Varun K. Chopra, Mr.Amit Bhandari, Mr.Adit Pujari, Mr.Hitesh Rai, Mr.Akshat Gupta, Mr.Ayush Agarwal, Mr.Karan Gogna, Mr.Aamir Khan, Mr.Aman Singh Brar, Mr.Akshay Sahni, Ms.Anshu Kapoor, Mr.Bilal Khan & Mr.R.V. Prabhat, Advs. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Through Mr.Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General, ..... Respondent Mr.Amit Mahajan & Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.RajatNair & Mr.Kanu Agrawal, Spl. Counsels, for CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT Vide the present bail petition, the... Petitioner/accused herein Sh. P. BAIL APPLN. 2270/2019 Page 1 of 47 Chidambaram seeks bail i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-23-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1106/2018 % Judgment reserved on: September 27th, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:23. d October, 2019 AKASH ....Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur with Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Advocates Versus State with SI Rajeshwar, PS STATE Palam Village ....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the CORAM: SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 The present Appeal is instituted on behalf of the appellant under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) against the impugned judgment dated 13.07.2018 and order on sentence dated 18.07.2018 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dwarka Courts, Delhi, in Session Case No.440982/2016 in FIR No.157/2013, registered at Police Station Palam Village under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) whereby the appellant was convicted for the offenc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-24-2019
$~8 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Delivered on :24. h October, 2019 + RFA3132018 MASYC PROJECTS PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Tarun Sharma, Ms.Akanksha Kapoor and Mr.Pradeep Singh, Advocates. versus NILACHAL IRON AND POWER LTD ..... Respondent and Through : Mr.Gaurav Kejriwal Mr.Gurpreet Hora, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree dated 19.12.2017 passed by the learned Additional District Judge- 06/West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned Trial Court) in CS No.11280/2016 whereby the suit filed by appellant for recovery of Rs.20,37,506/- was dismissed, primarily, on grounds of territorial jurisdiction.2. The brief facts which led to the filing of the suit, as are noted in impugned judgment are as under:-"1. xxxxxxxxx the plaintiff company is engaged in manufacture of material handling equipments like belt, conveyors, conveying a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-31-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1117/2018 SANDEEP STATE Through Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Through Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Inspector Radhey Shyam, PS Narela ATO. Reserved on :15. h October, 2019 Date of Decision:31. t October, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant-convict challenging the judgment dated 21st August, 2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Special Fast Track Court, Rohini, Delhi in Sessions Case No.115/2013 arising out of FIR No.337/2009 registered with Police Station Narela convicting him under Sections 201, 302, 342 and 120B IPC and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 25,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 120B, imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 50,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 120B IPC, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-05-2019
+ W.P.(C) 13901/2018 ANJU BALA Reserved on:06. 09.2019 Pronounced on:05. 11.2019 ........ Petitioner $~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through Mr.A.K. Bhardwaj, Adv. with Ms.Jagriti Singh, Adv. versus GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.V.K. Garg, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Noopur Dubey & Mr.Amit Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to quash and set aside the impugned memorandum No.CO/HR/Disc./D- 142/2016 dated 02.08.2016, inquiry report dated 28.03.2017, orders dated 31.05.2017, 23.08.2017, 11.04.2018 and 06.12.2018.2. Further seeks direction thereby directing the respondents to re-instate the petitioner back in service with all consequential benefits. W.P.(C) 13901/2018 Page 1 of 44 3. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner joined the respondent company as Management Trainee (E-1) w.e.f. 01.06.2002. She got promotions as Senior Officer in E-2 Grade, Dy...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-25-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS.(CRL) 10/2019 & CRL.M.A. 38135/2019 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION Through ........ Petitioner versus $~6 & 7 * + AMAN LOHIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Ms. Rytim Vohra, Ms. Akriti Tyagi, Mr. Sanjeevi Seshadri and Ms. Niharika Kaul, Advocates with Ms. Kiran Lohia in person. Ms. Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Altamish Siddiki and Mr. Rajat Bhalla, Advocates for respondent No.1- Aman Lohia. Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma and Ms. Ruchika Wadhawan, Advocates for Ajey Lohia. Ms. Joshini Tuli, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Spl. PP for UOI/CBI. + W.P.(CRL) 2375/2019 & CRL.M.As. 34316/2019, 34467/2019, WITH375572019, 38136/2019 AND392302017 KIRAN LOHIA Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Ms. Rytim ........ Petitioner CONT.CAS.(CRL) 10/2019 & W.P.(Crl.) 237...
Tag this Judgment!