Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-31-2019
$~21 to 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:29. h January, 2019 Judgement pronounced on:31. t May, 2019 + CRL.A. 681/2017 BIPLAV BISWAS .... Appellant Through: Mr. KTS Tulsi, Senior Advocate with Mr. A. Faraz Khan, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State .... Respondent CRL.A. 705/2017 DEEPAK .... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State CRL.A. 1161/2017 DEEPAK .... Appellant Through: Mr. SB Dandapani, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State .... Respondent CRL.A. 6/2018 HARDEEP .... Appellant Through: Ms. Swati Rathi, Advocate along with Mr. Rohit Boora, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State CRL.A. 681/2017 & other connected matters Page 1 of 58 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHI...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-01-2019
$~ * + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1284/2014 & CRL.M.A.13864/2015 SHIVA @ CHANDRIKA ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Adv. (DHCLSC) with Mrs. Pinky Dubey, Mr. Saurabh Kumar and Ms. Harpreet Kalsi, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Through Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with SI Surender Singh, PS Sector-23, Dwarka, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT0107.2019 This appeal, at the instance of the accused Shiva @ Chandrika, calls into question judgment, dated 24th March, 2014, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ), convicting the appellant under Sections 344/376/376D/323/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the IPC), as well as the consequent order, dated 29th March, 2014, whereby the learned ASJ has sentenced the appellant to (i) 3 years rigorous imprisonment (RI) with fine of 5000/, for the offence under Section 344, IPC, with default sent...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:01. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 6470/2013 & CM No.14085/2013 PIONEER OVERSEAS CORPORATION ........ Petitioner versus CHAIRPERSON, PROTECTION OF PLANT VARIETIES AND FARMERS RIGHTS AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 6208/2014 & CM No.15019/2014 AND PIONEER OVERSEAS CORPORATION ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr Praveen Anand, Mr Archana Shankar, Ms Geetanjali Visvanathan, Ms Neeti Nelson, Ms Asavani Jain and Mr Priyanks Dubey, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr Prateek Dhanda, Mr Waize Ali Noor, Mr Parth Semwal and Ms Shruti Dutt, Advocates for R-1 and R-3. Mr Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr Ahishek Saket, Mr Manish Madhukar, Ms Shabana Farah, Mr Rahul Duney, Mr Ketan Paul, Mr Tushar Bhushan, Ms Chitral and Mr Pranav, Advocates for R-2/Kaveri Seeds. W.P.(C) 6470/2013 & 6208/2014 Page 1 of 49 CORAM H...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:01. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 6470/2013 & CM No.14085/2013 PIONEER OVERSEAS CORPORATION ........ Petitioner versus CHAIRPERSON, PROTECTION OF PLANT VARIETIES AND FARMERS RIGHTS AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 6208/2014 & CM No.15019/2014 AND PIONEER OVERSEAS CORPORATION ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr Praveen Anand, Mr Archana Shankar, Ms Geetanjali Visvanathan, Ms Neeti Nelson, Ms Asavani Jain and Mr Priyanks Dubey, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr Prateek Dhanda, Mr Waize Ali Noor, Mr Parth Semwal and Ms Shruti Dutt, Advocates for R-1 and R-3. Mr Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr Ahishek Saket, Mr Manish Madhukar, Ms Shabana Farah, Mr Rahul Duney, Mr Ketan Paul, Mr Tushar Bhushan, Ms Chitral and Mr Pranav, Advocates for R-2/Kaveri Seeds. W.P.(C) 6470/2013 & 6208/2014 Page 1 of 49 CORAM H...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-02-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d July, 2019 LPA8652015 and C.M. Appl. No.28936/2015 (for stay) UNION BANK OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. O.P. Gaggar, Advocate. versus S.K. DHAWAN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jaspreet Singh Rai and Mr. Rohit Napal, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGEMENT JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal has been filed challenging the judgment dated 4.9.2015 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 8216/2002 whereby the learned Single Judge has quashed the report of the Inquiry Officer, penalty order, appellate order as well as the order passed in the review filed by the respondent.2. Brief facts necessary for the present appeal are that the respondent was appointed as a clerk on 1.3.1966 in the appellant-Bank and during the course of his service earned several promotions. Between the period LPA8652015 Page 1 of 17 16.5.1996 and 20.2.1998 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-04-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :4. h July, 2019 + CS (OS) 243/2019 NAMITA SHARMA & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Anshul Mittal and Mr. Harshit Advocates. Vashisht, (M:9899220567) Versus JAG MOHAN AHUJA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Counsel (attendance slip not given) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.As. 6600/2019 (u/O XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC) & 8417/2019 (u/O XXXIX Rule 4 CPC) 1. Present suit has been preferred by the Plaintiffs namely Ms. Namita Sharma and Naval Khanna. The Plaintiffs are the children of Late Shri Daulat Ram Ahuja. The Plaintiffs seek permanent injunction and partition of two properties i.e. (a) E-285, Naraina Vihar, New Delhi-110028 admeasuring 300 sq. yards and (b) shop bearing No.6045, Gali Matke Wali, Sadar Bazar, Delhi.2. Late Shri Daulat Ram Ahuja had a brother namely Mr. Jag Mohan Ahuja, who is Defendant No.1. The Plaintiffs themselves had three brothers namely Mr. Naveen Ahuja, Mr. Sunil Ahuj...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-11-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~28 * + Date of Decision:11. 7.2019 % W.P.(C) 12233/2016 SEEMA VERMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishwendra Verma, Advocate. versus THE EAST END COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshay Bhardwaj, Advocate for R Mr. S.K.Sharma and Mr. Vishal Thakre, Advocates for R-2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 16.10.2015 passed by the Financial Commissioner, Delhi in Revision Petition preferred by the petitioner being Case No 177/2010. The learned Financial Commissioner has rejected the revision petition preferred by the petitioner, which had been preferred by the petitioner under Section 116 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 to assail the order dated 16.03.2010 passed by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies. The Registrar of Cooperative ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-16-2019
$~ * + STATE % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A.760/2018 VINOD RANA Through: Ms.Kavita Jha, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr.Vaibhav Kulkarni and Mr.Rajeev Jha, Advocates. versus Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the ..... Respondent State with SI Pramodh Kumar and SI Satish Singh, PS Mayur Vihar. Date of Decision:16. h July, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant-convict challenging the judgment as well as order on sentence dated 02nd April, 2018 and 07th April, 2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-03 (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi respectively in Sessions Case No.672/2016 arising from FIR No.620/2014 under Section 302 IPC registered with PS Mayur Vihar, whereby the appellant-convict had been convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. Page 1 of 31 Crl.A.760/2018 CASE OF THE PROSECUTION2 The prosecution case in bri...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-19-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h July, 2019 + CS(COMM) 157/2017 & I.A. 10119/2014 THERMAX LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. N.K. Bhardwaj & Mr. Bikash Ghorai, Advocates (M-9810147174) versus THERMAX ENGINEERS PVT LTD Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ..... Defendant Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The Plaintiff Thermax Limited has filed the present suit seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark and trade name, passing off, etc. in respect of its trade name THERMAX. The case of the Plaintiff is that it had coined and adopted the mark THERMAX in 1974 and the same is being used as a trademark, house mark and is also a distinctive and prominent mark of its corporate name. The changes in the constitution of the company Thermax Ltd, from Thermax India Pvt. Ltd leading up to it becoming a listed company on 9th January, 1995, has been explained in paragraph 4 of the plaint.2. The mark THERMAX is also a registered t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-24-2019
$~10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + MAC.APP. 580/2018 & CM APPL. 54041/2018 Decided on:24. 07.2019 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate. versus KHUSHBOO & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Roshan Lal, Advocate for R-2 and R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. At joint-request, the case is taken up for final arguments.2. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 17.03.2018 in the claim petition bearing MACT No.449362 of 2016 on account of the unfortunate demise of the kin of the claimants in a road accident.3. It is the appellants case that the offending motor vehicle was not identified, therefore, the appellant would not be liable to indemnify the claimants and to pay the awarded amount. It was the claimants case that at about 8:40 pm on 14.02.2010, Raja, the deceased, tried to cross the road near Metro Station, Adarsh Nagar, when the offending vehicle i.e. a Maruti MAC.APP....
Tag this Judgment!