Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-08-2019
..... confirmed that the raiding party had been constituted crl.a. 831/2014 page 2 of 10 consequent to receipt of secret information that one person, named deepak, who was a nepali national, would be approaching the indian oil petrol pump, near majnu ka tila, for supplying hashish (charas). he confirmed intercepting and overpowering the appellant (whom he recognised in court). he ..... imprisonment of 6 months. crl.a. 831/2014 page 1 of 10 2. the case of the prosecution, as upheld by the learned special judge, is that the appellant, a nepali national, was intercepted, on 23rd june, 2012, at about 11:45 am, and was found to be carrying 10 kg of hashish (charas), which constituted an offence under section 20 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-04-2019
..... hindi daily(m) 11/03/2019 11/03/2019 jaipur hindi daily(m) 11/03/2019 11/03/2019 gangtok english daily(m) 11/03/2019 11/03/2019 gangtok nepali daily(m) 11/03/2019 11/03/2019 chennai english daily(m) 11/03/2019 11/03/2019 sakshi hyderabad telugu daily(m) 11/03/2019 11/03/2019 allahabad .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-25-2019
..... he was working as a loader on 02.05.2010 and was sitting at the counter of the lufthansa airlines and a passenger, who looked like a chinese or a nepali, brought two pieces of baggage. he stated that he affixed a tag over the baggage brought by the passenger and kept it aside. he stated that thereafter, certain officers from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-07-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8791/2018 & CM APPLs. 52194-95/2018 MASTER SINGHAM (THROUGH NATURAL GUARDIAN) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv. with Mr. Mohit Mudgal and Ms.Akansha Sharma, Advs. versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ANR ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P.S. Sudheer, Adv. with Mrs. A. Mathew and Mr. Bharat Sood, Adv. for R-2 Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC for GNCTD with Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee and Ms. Shivani Vij, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT % 1. Master Singham is an 8-year old boy. He was granted admission, in the Sanskriti School (hereinafter referred to as the School) in 2013, under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category. Three years later, his admission was ignominiously cancelled, by the Directorate of Education (DoE), vide under Section 24(3) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the DSE Act) read with c...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-08-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h August, 2017 Decided on:8. h January, 2019 CS(OS) 205/2009 RODERICK JOHN ANDREW MACKENZIE..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr.Kirti S. Javali and Ms.Nikita C. Jain, Advocates. Versus HIMALAYAN HELI SERVICES PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr. Vivek Malik and Mr.Mukul Thakur, Advocates. + Crl. M.A. No.5011/2009 in CS(OS) 210/2009 HIMACHAL HELICOPTER SKIING PTY LTD...... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. Kirti S. Javali, Advocate. versus HIMALAYAN HELI SERVICES PVT. LTD...... Defendant Represented by: Mr.Vivek Malik and Mr.Mukul Thakur, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Roderick John Andrew Mackenzie, the plaintiff in CS(OS) No.205/2009 filed the suit inter alia seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendants their employees, servants, agents etc. from using or otherwise copying, selling, offering for sale, counterfeit/unlicensed versions of the plaintiffs copyright in his artistic work HIMLAYAN ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-08-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h August, 2017 Decided on:8. h January, 2019 CS(OS) 205/2009 RODERICK JOHN ANDREW MACKENZIE..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr.Kirti S. Javali and Ms.Nikita C. Jain, Advocates. Versus HIMALAYAN HELI SERVICES PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr. Vivek Malik and Mr.Mukul Thakur, Advocates. + Crl. M.A. No.5011/2009 in CS(OS) 210/2009 HIMACHAL HELICOPTER SKIING PTY LTD...... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. Kirti S. Javali, Advocate. versus HIMALAYAN HELI SERVICES PVT. LTD...... Defendant Represented by: Mr.Vivek Malik and Mr.Mukul Thakur, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Roderick John Andrew Mackenzie, the plaintiff in CS(OS) No.205/2009 filed the suit inter alia seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendants their employees, servants, agents etc. from using or otherwise copying, selling, offering for sale, counterfeit/unlicensed versions of the plaintiffs copyright in his artistic work HIMLAYAN ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-16-2019
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 12133/2016 % 1. AKHIL DELHI PRATHMIK SHIKSHAK SANGH Through: Mr. P.S. Sridhar Raj, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, SC-North DMC/R-1 with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan and Ms. Shiva Pandey, Advs. Mr. Rakesh Mittal, SC-SDMC with Ms.Yamini Mittal, Adv. for R-2/SDMC Mr. G.D. Mishra, EDMC/R-5 SC- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) This writ petition has been filed by an organisation going by the moniker Akhil Delhi Prathmik Shikshak Sangh, which purports to be a society, registered under the Societies Registration Act, comprising, inter alia, various teachers of schools run by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi and espousing their cause.2. The writ petition ventilates a grievance against devolution, on teachers in government schools, of duties which are not linked to education, specifically opening of bank a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-22-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 17/2017 Reserved on:12. 10.2018 Date of decision :22. 01.2019 TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD Through: Mr.Ratan ........ Petitioner Singh, Ms.Priyanka Solanki & Mr.Suraj Prakash, Advs. Kumar versus NEXT GENERATION BUSINESS POWER SYSTEMS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.T.S. Ahuja & Mr.Varun S. Ahuja, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the Arbitral Award dated 23.08.2014 passed by the Sole Arbitrator (hereinafter referred to as Impugned Award).2. The Impugned Award allowed the claims of the respondent inter alia towards amounts withheld by the petitioner as deductions, unpaid amount for the last quarter of the Contract period, dues for duration after the contractually stipulated date of completion as well as reimbursement for Bank Guarantee encashed and release of Assured...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-24-2019
$~19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h January, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2712/2016 STATE Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP ........ Petitioner for the State with SI Nepal Singh, PS CR Park. versus SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: Respondent in person. ..... Respondent ORDER (ORAL) 1. The first information report (FIR) No.76/2007 of the subject case was registered on the compliant of Phool Singh, a delivery-man, engaged by a firm named and styled as Kalkaji Gas Service, the duties entrusted to him being to take gas cylinders from the godown of his employer in a three wheeler scooter (TSR) and deliver the same to the respective consumers, as per instructions.2. It is alleged that, on 16.03.2007, he having carried twenty-two gas cylinders from the godown of his employer, had reached near house No.1520 in C.R. Park, New Delhi at about 1:45 p.m., he was accosted by four persons who had come to the place in an Indica car bearing registration N...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-31-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:31. t January, 2019 W.P.(C) 9883/2018, CM No.38508/2018 CUSHMAN AND WAKEFIELD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with ........ Petitioner Mr. Karan Malhotra, Mr. Vikram Bajaj, Mr. Rahul Raj, Mr. Chandra Thampi and Mr. Kapil Seth, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: Ms. Madhavi Divan, ASG with Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Nidhi Khanna and Ms. Aditya Goyal, Advs. for UOI AND + W.P.(C) 9889/2018, CM No.38522/2018 KNIGHT FRANK (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with ........ Petitioner Mr. Karan Malhotra, Mr. Vikram Bajaj, Mr. Rahul Raj, Mr. Chandra Thampi and Mr. Kapil Seth, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Ms. Madhavi Divan, ASG with ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Nidhi Khanna and Ms. Aditya Goyal, Advs. for UOI AND + W.P.(C) 9890/2018, CM No.38524/2018 CBRE SOUTH ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through...
Tag this Judgment!