Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-09-2019
$~ * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1244/2018 NIKHIL SAXENA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Jai Khanduja, Advocate. versus STATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp. Anil Kumar and ASI Ajit Kumar, PS Adarsh Nagar. CRL.A. 1249/2018 WITH VISHAL SONKAR ..... Appellant Through Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp. Anil Kumar and ASI Ajit Kumar, PS Adarsh Nagar. AND CRL.A. 95/2019 PUNIT @ RAJU Through Mr. Sahil Talwar, Advocate with Mr. Chander Kant and Mr. Nikhil Garg, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus CRL. A. Nos.1244/2018, 1249/2018, 95/2019 Page 1 of 33 THE STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp. Anil Kumar and ASI Ajit Kumar, PS Adarsh Nagar. % Reserved On :02. d November, 2019 Date of Decision:09. h December, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-25-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP (C) 1288/2012 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish K. Bishnoi, Adv. with Ms. Tanvi Sapra, Adv. versus AJAY TIWARI UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT2511.2019 ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Adv. for R-1 Ms. Tanya Agarwal, Adv. for R-2 % 1. These proceedings emanate from a complaint, dated 9th September, 2008, submitted by Ms. M (whose name is being withheld, for the sake of propriety), an M. Phil. Student in the Department of Hindi, University of Delhi, wherein she alleged that she had been sexually harassed by the petitioner who, at the time, was a Professor in the said Department. The complaint was referred to the Apex Complaints Committee (hereinafter referred to as ACC), under Ordinance XV-D of the Ordinances governing the University of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the University). The ACC found the allegation of sexual harassment, against the petitioner, to b...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-31-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:31. t January, 2019 W.P.(C) 9883/2018, CM No.38508/2018 CUSHMAN AND WAKEFIELD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with ........ Petitioner Mr. Karan Malhotra, Mr. Vikram Bajaj, Mr. Rahul Raj, Mr. Chandra Thampi and Mr. Kapil Seth, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: Ms. Madhavi Divan, ASG with Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Nidhi Khanna and Ms. Aditya Goyal, Advs. for UOI AND + W.P.(C) 9889/2018, CM No.38522/2018 KNIGHT FRANK (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with ........ Petitioner Mr. Karan Malhotra, Mr. Vikram Bajaj, Mr. Rahul Raj, Mr. Chandra Thampi and Mr. Kapil Seth, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Ms. Madhavi Divan, ASG with ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Nidhi Khanna and Ms. Aditya Goyal, Advs. for UOI AND + W.P.(C) 9890/2018, CM No.38524/2018 CBRE SOUTH ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-26-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h March, 2019 Decided on:26. h March, 2019 DASHRATH LAL (DECEASED) THR. LRs LPA942016 .....Appellants Through: Mr.Kamal Mehta, Advocate. versus DVB (NOW BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD.) & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr.Sandeep Prabhakar with Mr.Vikas Mehta, Advocates for R1. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal by the legal representatives (LRs) (Appellants 2 to4) of late JUDGMENT Shri Dashrath Lal (Appellant No.1) and three others (Appellants 5 to7) is directed against the order dated 17th November 2015 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing WP(C) 4093 of 2000.2. The challenge in the writ petition was to an order dated 8th March 2000 passed by the Delhi Vidyut Board (DVB), the predecessor-in-interest of the Respondent No.1 BSES Rajdhani Power Limited (BRPL) dismissing Appellant No.1 and three other employees (Appellants 5 to7) from service. The challenge was also to the order ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-30-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(CRL) 743/2019 & Crl.M.A. 5412/2019 (stay) Decided on:30. h April, 2019 ANKUR NARANG ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Hitender Kapur, Adv. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Babbar, Adv. with SI Yogender PS Paschim Vihar. Mr. Kamal Gupta, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.38/2019 under Sections 498A/4IPC registered at PS Paschim Vihar on the complaint of respondent No.2.2. The three grounds taken by the petitioner seeking quashing of FIR in question are; first is lack of territorial jurisdiction contending that no offence has taken place in Delhi and thus Police Station has no jurisdiction to investigate and the Trial Court has no jurisdiction to try the offence; secondly, that the FIR was not lodged within the period of limitation and thirdly that on the face of the FIR the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jun-06-2019
$~ * + + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 660/2017 SIKODH MAHTO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.B.Dandapani, Adv. STATE CRL.A. 698/2017 versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with ASI Yashin Khan, PS Crime Branch PRABHU MAHTO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jivesh Kr. Tiwari, Adv. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with ASI Yashin Khan, PS Crime Branch CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT6h June, 2019 Vide judgment dated 26th April, 2017, the learned Additional Sessions Judge (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ) has convicted the appellants under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to CRL.A. 660/2017 & CRL.A. 698/2017 Page 1 of 40 as the NDPS Act). As a consequence, vide separate order dated 29th April, 2017, the learned ASJ has sentenced each appellant to 10 years rigorous imprisonment (RI) and fine of 1 lakh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jun-06-2019
$~ * + + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 660/2017 SIKODH MAHTO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.B.Dandapani, Adv. STATE CRL.A. 698/2017 versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with ASI Yashin Khan, PS Crime Branch PRABHU MAHTO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jivesh Kr. Tiwari, Adv. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with ASI Yashin Khan, PS Crime Branch CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT6h June, 2019 Vide judgment dated 26th April, 2017, the learned Additional Sessions Judge (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ) has convicted the appellants under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to CRL.A. 660/2017 & CRL.A. 698/2017 Page 1 of 40 as the NDPS Act). As a consequence, vide separate order dated 29th April, 2017, the learned ASJ has sentenced each appellant to 10 years rigorous imprisonment (RI) and fine of 1 lakh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~1 & 5 * + CONT.CAS.(CRL) 10/2019 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS AMAN LOHIA & ORS. Through Mr.Jai A Dehadrai with Mr.Siddharth Arora for Aman Lohia. Mr. Joginder Tuli, with Ms. Joshini Tuli and Ms. Divya Jangid, Advocates for Respondent No.2 alongwith Respondent No.2 in person. + W.P.(CRL) 2375/2019 & Crl.M.A.Nos.34315-34316/2019, 34467/2019, 34924/2019 KIRAN LOHIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Ms. Rytim Vohra, Mr. Mayank Grover and Ms. Bhavna Bawa, Advocates alongwith Ms. Kiran Lohia in person. versus STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj with DSP Cont.Cas.(Crl.) 10/2019 & W.P.(Crl.) 2375/2019 Sangwan (I.O.) for UOI/CBI. Mr.Jai A Dehadrai with Mr.Siddharth Arora for Aman Lohia. Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ruchika Wadhawan, Ms. Vidushi Nishank and Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocates for Respondent No.5. Page 1 of 9...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~1 & 5 * + CONT.CAS.(CRL) 10/2019 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS AMAN LOHIA & ORS. Through Mr.Jai A Dehadrai with Mr.Siddharth Arora for Aman Lohia. Mr. Joginder Tuli, with Ms. Joshini Tuli and Ms. Divya Jangid, Advocates for Respondent No.2 alongwith Respondent No.2 in person. + W.P.(CRL) 2375/2019 & Crl.M.A.Nos.34315-34316/2019, 34467/2019, 34924/2019 KIRAN LOHIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Ms. Rytim Vohra, Mr. Mayank Grover and Ms. Bhavna Bawa, Advocates alongwith Ms. Kiran Lohia in person. versus STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj with DSP Cont.Cas.(Crl.) 10/2019 & W.P.(Crl.) 2375/2019 Sangwan (I.O.) for UOI/CBI. Mr.Jai A Dehadrai with Mr.Siddharth Arora for Aman Lohia. Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ruchika Wadhawan, Ms. Vidushi Nishank and Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocates for Respondent No.5. Page 1 of 9...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-02-2019
11 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 659/2019 THE STATE Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State ........ Petitioner versus with Insp., PS Jafrabad. GAURAV @ MOHIT & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. Date of Decision:02. d December, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) CRL. M.A. 41606/2019 (condonation of delay) Keeping in view the averments made in the application, the delay of nineteen days in filing the criminal leave petition is condoned. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. Crl.M.A. 41607/2019 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, present application stands disposed of. Page 1 of 7 CRL. L.P. 659/2019 CRL.L.P. 659/2019 1. Present criminal leave petition has been filed on behalf of the State challenging the judgment dated 9th August, 2019 passed by Additional Sessions Judge05 (Shahdara District), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi acquitting the...
Tag this Judgment!