Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-26-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 500/2019 ROHIT STATE Through Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Equebal Nasir and Mr. Naahid Nasir, Advocates. versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Ranjan, SI Jasmes Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. Mr. Kuber Giri with Mr. Sarvpreet Singh Chawla, Advocates for Victim-Complainant. WITH CRL.A. 504/2019 SHIV KUMAR @ SHIBU ..... Appellant Through Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate with Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Equebal Nasir and Mr. Naahid Nasir, Advocates. STATE versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Ranjan, SI Jasmes Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. Mr. Kuber Giri with Mr. Sarvpreet Singh Chawla, Advocates for Victim-Complainant. WITH Page 1 of 49 Crl.A.500/2019 & Ors. + CRL.A. 819/2019 SUNIL alias ANNU ..... Appellant Through Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate with Mr. Mohit B., Advocate versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-26-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 500/2019 ROHIT STATE Through Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Equebal Nasir and Mr. Naahid Nasir, Advocates. versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Ranjan, SI Jasmes Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. Mr. Kuber Giri with Mr. Sarvpreet Singh Chawla, Advocates for Victim-Complainant. WITH CRL.A. 504/2019 SHIV KUMAR @ SHIBU ..... Appellant Through Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate with Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Equebal Nasir and Mr. Naahid Nasir, Advocates. STATE versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Ranjan, SI Jasmes Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. Mr. Kuber Giri with Mr. Sarvpreet Singh Chawla, Advocates for Victim-Complainant. WITH Page 1 of 49 Crl.A.500/2019 & Ors. + CRL.A. 819/2019 SUNIL alias ANNU ..... Appellant Through Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate with Mr. Mohit B., Advocate versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-26-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 500/2019 ROHIT STATE Through Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Equebal Nasir and Mr. Naahid Nasir, Advocates. versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Ranjan, SI Jasmes Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. Mr. Kuber Giri with Mr. Sarvpreet Singh Chawla, Advocates for Victim-Complainant. WITH CRL.A. 504/2019 SHIV KUMAR @ SHIBU ..... Appellant Through Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate with Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Equebal Nasir and Mr. Naahid Nasir, Advocates. STATE versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Ranjan, SI Jasmes Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. Mr. Kuber Giri with Mr. Sarvpreet Singh Chawla, Advocates for Victim-Complainant. WITH Page 1 of 49 Crl.A.500/2019 & Ors. + CRL.A. 819/2019 SUNIL alias ANNU ..... Appellant Through Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate with Mr. Mohit B., Advocate versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-26-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 282/2019 Date of Decision:26.07.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: LALITA STATE & ORS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Advocate and Ms. Richa Dhawan , Advocate versus Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State Mr. Archit Upadhyay, Advocate (DHCLSC) for R2 and R3 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present revision petition has been filed under Section 397 r/w Section 482 CrPC assailing the order dated 31.01.2019 passed by the Special Judge (P.C. Act) CBI-01 (Central District), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Crl. Appeal No.65/2018.2. The facts of the prosecution, as noted by the trial court, are that the... RESPONDENTS No.2 and 3 faced trial in the FIR No.05/2009 registered under Sections 324 r/w 34 IPC at P.S. Nabi Karim. After the trial, vide judgment dated 04.10.2018, the... RESPONDENTS No.2 and 3 were acquitted of all the charges by the Metropolitan Magistrate.3. The ord...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-30-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~2 * + THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -9 ..... Appellant ITA2632019 Through: Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocate. versus TRANSCEND MT SERVICES PVT. LTD. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH Through: (appearance not given) ..... Respondent % ORDER3007.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The Revenue is in appeal against an order dated 30th November, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA Nos.12697/Del/2014 and CO. No.163/Del/2017 for Assessment Year (AY) 2007-08.2. The facts in brief are that the Assessee is a subsidiary of Heartland Asia (Mauritius) Limited primarily engaged in the provision of IT enabled services in the area of medical transcription to its parent company in the United States of America and other Associated Enterprises (AEs).3. The Assessee filed its return of income for the AY in question on 31st October 2007. The return was picked up for scrutiny under Section 143 of ITA2632019 Page 1 of 7 the Inc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-07-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :02. 08.2019 Date of decision:07. 08.2019 W.P.(C) 10933/2018, CM APPL. 33734/2019, CM APPL.42590/2018, CM APPL. 33735/2019 DEEPANSHU BHADORIYA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sidharth Gupta, Ms. Prerna Priyadarshini & Mr. Somay Kapoor, Advocates. versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Michelle, Ms.Puja Sarkar, Ms. Arunima, Ms.Sumangla & Mr. Tarun Verma, Advocates for MCI. Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Advocate for R- 2 & 3. Mr. Nishit Agrawal & Mr. Harsh Mishra, Advocates for R-4. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Mr. Raghav Nagar, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioners namely Deepanshu Bhadoriya, Wadhwani Ashwin Ramesh, Aditi Pathak, Rahul Soni and Sneha Kumari participated in the W.P. (C) 10933/2018 Page 1 of 75 CBSE conducted NEET for UG medical courses in the year 2016 and state that they were eligible and qualifi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-08-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: July 12, 2019 Decided on: August 08, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 4120/2016 ASHOK CHAWLA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Kunal Malhotra, Advocate with Ms. Palak Kharbanda, & Mr. Vivek, Advocates. C.B.I. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special P.P. with Mr. K.P. Sharma, Deputy SP, CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT1 Some confusion prevails concerning the procedure governing the criminal cases involving accusations of offences under the Official Secrets Act, 1923 (the Official Secrets Act), certain notifications issued by the central government, some observations in an earlier judgment of a single bench of this court, and a seemingly unreasonable posture adopted by Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in the case from which the present petition arises, having possibly added to the causes. The petition at hand presents the opportunity for such confusion to be dispelled and clarity in the approach expect...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-09-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on 31.1.2019 Judgment Pronounced on 09.08.2019 EX.P. 99/2015 GLENCORE INTERNATIONAL AG ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr. Nakul Dewan with Mr. Moazzam Khan, Ms. Shweta Sahu, Mr. Brijesh Kumar, and Mr. Kartik Prasad, Advs. versus INDIAN POTASH LIMITED & ANR. ..... Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Arjun Singh Bhati, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: Preface 1. The captioned execution petition seeks enforcement of foreign award dated 12.3.2012 (hereafter referred to as Final Award) and the cost of the reference awarded in favour of the decree holder i.e. Glencore International AG. (hereafter referred to as Glencore) which was passed by the arbitral tribunal after the final award on 12.5.2015 (hereafter referred to as Cost Award).2. Notice in the execution petition was issued on 23.3.2015. The judgment debtor i.e. India Potash Ltd. (hereafter referred to as IPL) entered appearance through its cou...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-09-2019
$~42 & 43 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 402/2019, I.A. 10589/2019 BATA INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Adv. versus AVS INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 201/2019 Through: Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Adv. ..... Respondent BATA INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Adv. versus AVS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % SANJEEV NARULA, J.ORDER0908.2019 Through: Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS ARB.P. 402/2019 1. By way of the present petition under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the A&C Act), the... Petitioner prays that the parties be referred to arbitration under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties. ARB.P. 402/2019 & O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 201/2019 Page 1 of 24 Brief Facts:2.... Petitioner (BATA India Ltd.), is a company manufacturing footwear. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-09-2019
$~42 & 43 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 402/2019, I.A. 10589/2019 BATA INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Adv. versus AVS INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 201/2019 Through: Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Adv. ..... Respondent BATA INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Adv. versus AVS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % SANJEEV NARULA, J.ORDER0908.2019 Through: Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS ARB.P. 402/2019 1. By way of the present petition under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the A&C Act), the... Petitioner prays that the parties be referred to arbitration under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties. ARB.P. 402/2019 & O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 201/2019 Page 1 of 24 Brief Facts:2.... Petitioner (BATA India Ltd.), is a company manufacturing footwear. ...
Tag this Judgment!