Multiply - Year 2012 - Judgments

Dec 04 2012 (HC)

M/S. the United India Insurance Company Ltd Vs. Sh. Suraj Bhan and ors ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-04-2012

..... is expected to last the principle was explained and illustrated by a mathematical example the multiplier represents the number of years purchase on which the loss of dependency is capitalised take ..... purchase of 20 will yield the annual dependency perpetually then allowance to scale down the multiplier would have to be made taking into account the uncertainties of the future the allowances .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 21 2012 (HC)

United India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Mota Ram and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-21-2012

..... is expected to last the principle was explained and illustrated by a mathematical example the multiplier represents the number of years purchase on which the loss of dependency is capitalised take ..... purchase of 20 will yield the annual dependency perpetually then allowance to scale down the multiplier would have to be made taking into account the uncertainties of the future the allowances .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 04 2012 (HC)

The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited V ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-04-2012

..... to the facts and circumstances of the case and capitalizing the multiplicand by appropriate multiplier the multiplier is determined by the age of the deceased or the claimant the object is ..... after examining various theories for calculating quantum of pecuniary compensation has repeatedly held that the multiplier method is logically sound and legally well established the said method is based upon .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 03 2012 (HC)

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Sh. Mohinder Tokas and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-03-2012

..... is expected to last the principle was explained and illustrated by a mathematical example the multiplier represents the number of years purchase on which the loss of dependency is capitalised take ..... purchase of 20 will yield the annual dependency perpetually then allowance to scale down the multiplier would have to be made taking into account the uncertainties of the future the allowances .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 11 2012 (HC)

A.Dorairaj Vs. K.Karumbukonar

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-11-2012

..... award just and reasonable compensation the tribunal ought to have awarded appropriate compensation by adopting multiplier method and structured formula as per schedule ii the same is seriously opposed by the ..... in 1994 2 scc 176 to the effect that the proper method of computation is multiplier method and any departure except in exceptional and extraordinary cases would introduce inconsistency of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 31 2012 (HC)

Raj Kumar Gupta and anr Vs. Mohd. Shamshad and ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-31-2012

..... case and capitalizing the multiplicand by an appropriate multiplier the choice of the multiplier is determined by the age of the ..... principle was explained and illustrated by a mathematical example the multiplier represents the number of years purchase on which the ..... the annual dependency perpetually then allowance to scale down the multiplier would have to be made taking into account the uncertainties .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 07 2012 (HC)

Ritu Minor Thr. Her Father and ors. Vs. Regional Manager Uttranchal St ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-07-2012

..... that objective of the motor vehicles act laying down a structured formula and utilizing the multiplier method is to bring about uniformity in the compensation amounts awarded by courts this court ..... principles emerge from the above discussion a in all cases of injury or permanent disablement multiplier method cannot be mechanically applied to ascertain the future loss of income or earning power .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 05 2012 (HC)

Chanderwati and ors Vs. Sat NaraIn and ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-05-2012

..... tribunal towards the personal expenses of the deceased and the multiplier adopted by the learned tribunal mr goyal contended that in ..... death and as such the appropriate multiplier would be the multiplier of 17 and not the multiplier of 15 18 in view of ..... needs to be augumented by an appropriate multiplier the appropriate multiplier in the instant case being the multiplier of 17 the total loss of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 23 2012 (HC)

Date of Decision : 23.11.2012 Vs. Mahabir Singh and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-23-2012

..... and sonu as 3250 it deducted 50 therefrom as expenses for personal use and applied multiplier according to the age of appellants compensation was assessed accordingly aggrieved present appeals have been ..... 3rd dependency has to be assessed accordingly ordered accordingly the other plea as regards the multiplier does not carry weight in the judgment of the apex court reported as vijay shankar .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 01 2012 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Gaje Singh and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-01-2012

..... road transport corporation trivandrum v susamma thomas mrs and ors supra has held that the multiplier method of compensation was the logically sound and well established method for determining the compensation ..... supreme court in sarla verma v delhi transport corporation 2009 6 scc 121 the appropriate multiplier according to the age of the mother is 15 and the appropriate deduction towards personal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Multiply - Judgment Search Results