Multiply - Judgment Search Results

Arun Kumar Agrawal and anr. Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... instances of particular awards in individual cases the proper method of computation is the multiplier method any departure except in exceptional and extraordinary cases would introduce inconsistency of principle ..... to the principles evolved by british courts for award of damages and reiterated the multiplier method spelt out in general manager kerala state road transport corporation v susamma thomas .....

Hamilton Vs. Lanning

Court: US Supreme Court

..... did not define projected disposable income most bankruptcy courts calculated it using a mechanical approach multiplying monthly income by the number of months in the plan and then determining the ..... advocating the mechanical approach contends that projected disposable income means past average monthly disposable income multiplied by the number of months in a debtor s plan respondent who favors the .....

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Smt. Naima Rehman and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2010(3)AWC2435

..... age of the deceased step 3 the annual contribution to the family multiplicand when multiplied by such multiplier gives the loss of dependancy to the family the funeral expenses cost of ..... susamma thomas case it has been observed that the proper method of computation is the multiplier method any departure except in exceptional and extraordinary cases would introduce inconsistency of principle .....

Shakti Devi. Vs. New India Insurance Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... co limited v charlie and anr 8 prepared the following table age of the multiplier multiplier multiplier multiplier multiplier actually deceased scale as scale as scale in specified used in second envisaged adopted ..... justified in rare and extraordinary circumstances and very exceptional cases we reiterate that the multiplier method should remain the only method as it has been for assessing the .....

Vasu Knitwear Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 2010(177)LC81(P& H),[2010]26STT120

..... on such fabrics 2 finished goods lying instock namely a unprocessed fabrics of declared value multiplied bycotton not containing 26 of the rate of duty on suchany other textile material unprocessed ..... fabrics b unprocessed fabrics other declared value multiplied bythan a above 60 of the rate of duty on suchunprocessed fabrics explanation 1 for .....

Kamla Prasad Singh. Vs. State of Bihar.

Court: Patna

..... the market value is determined on the basis of the yield then necessarily applying suitable multiplier the compensation need to be awarded under no circumstances the court should allow the ..... of the yield from the trees or plantation 8 years multiplier shall be appropriate multiplier for agricultural land 12 years multiplier shall be suitable multiplier 4 in this case the collector applied more than .....

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd. Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

..... resulting in permanent disability is not altogether ruled out and that only indiscriminate use of multiplier method without considering the suitability of such method to the particular case alone was held ..... division bench emphasized the point that the tribunal court shall decide the suitability of the multiplier method or the lumpsum method to the particular case taking into consideration the facts .....

The State Express Transport Corporation, Vs. Chandra Ammal, and ors.

Court: Chennai

..... convert it into a lump sum by capitalising it by an appropriate multiplier when multiplier method is adopted an appropriate multiplier is again determined by taking into consideration several imponderable factors since ..... towards the uncertainties of future life and for immediate lump sum payment the effective multiplier would be between 30 and 34 this is wholly impermissible in up state road .....

U.P.S.R.T.C. Vs. A. Srivastava

Court: Allahabad

..... chandreshwar misra 1983 acj 63 in which it was held that multiplier principle of determining the quantum of compensation appeared to be ..... tribunal considering the facts and circumstances of the case applied multiplier of 20 in view of the fact the superannuation age ..... thomas case usually english courts rarely exceed 16 as the multiplier courts in india too followed the same pattern till recently .....

The National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Velappan Nair S/O. Raman Pillai,

Court: Kerala

..... the supreme court has attempted to avoid the possibility of vagaries in the adoption of multiplier by subordinate tribunals the counsel argues that in these circumstances inasmuch as sarla verma does ..... contentions of the counsel for the appellant on the question of improper adoption of the multiplier and the improper deduction of amounts for personal expenses the impugned award does not deserve .....