Multiply - Year 2011 - Judgments

Dec 09 2011 (HC)

New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Rashid Ahmad and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-09-2011

..... of the lost dependency it is so because the choice of multiplier is determined by the age of the deceased or that of ..... s mamli learned counsel for the claimants has submitted that the multiplier has to be adopted irrespective of the consideration that the deceased ..... had been his parents aged 52 years the tribunal had adopted multiplier of 18 while computing compensation in the appeal brought by the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 22 2011 (HC)

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. P.C. Chacko and Others

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-22-2011

..... and to independently calculate the compensation payable under section 163a by resorting to the multiplier multiplicand method ignoring the scheme under the schedule a reading of the said decision ..... horizontal column alone subject to the note has to be taken into consideration the multiplier multiplicand method would be irrelevant and cannot be pressed into service while ascertaining compensation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 11 2011 (HC)

Uddam Singh JaIn Charitable Trust Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-11-2011

..... electricity connections in the neighbourhood of the premises of the petitioner has been using different multiplying factor without explaining any basis therefor 8 the counsel for the respondent ndmc under ..... engineer commercial who is stated to be a technical person states that the imposition of multiplying factor is dependent upon the current transformer ratio relatable to the sanctioned load and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 03 2011 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Durgesh Nandini Sharma and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-03-2011

..... c singhal the learned counsel for the appellants i the learned tribunal erroneously applied the multiplier of 13 to augment the multiplicand constituting the loss of dependency of the appellants whereas ..... courts and tribunals in paragraph 40 of its aforesaid judgment the supreme court tabulated the multipliers applicable to different age groups of deceased persons for the age group of persons between .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 03 2011 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Durgesh Nandini Sharma and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-03-2011

..... c singhal the learned counsel for the appellants i the learned tribunal erroneously applied the multiplier of 13 to augment the multiplicand constituting the loss of dependency of the appellants whereas ..... courts and tribunals in paragraph 40 of its aforesaid judgment the supreme court tabulated the multipliers applicable to different age groups of deceased persons for the age group of persons between .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 30 2011 (HC)

Kunhimon and Others Vs. P. Bhaskaran, Partner Pipe Field and Others

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jun-30-2011

..... counsel for the appellant sri m r nandakumar argued that the multiplier adopted by the tribunal is erroneous as the same was fixed ..... three judge bench of the apex court has held that selection of multiplier cannot be solely dependent on the age of the deceased following ..... in the second schedule it is not required to apply the multiplier except in a case of injuries and disabilities 17 in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 2011 (HC)

Sunil Kumar and anr. Vs. Inder Singh and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-30-2011

..... at the future loss of earnings by applying the standard multiplier method used to determine loss of dependency we may however ..... 70 the loss of earning capacity was computed according to the multiplier method the supreme court held as under the basis of ..... as to the proper measure of compensation is taking an appropriate multiplier of an appropriate multiplicand 32 assessment of general damages is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 16 2011 (HC)

Ram Devi and anr. Vs. Raj Kumar and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-16-2011

..... 50 years as set out in the post mortem report applied the multiplier of 10 thereby calculating the total compensation payable to the appellants to ..... years in the assessment of the age of any person the appropriate multiplier in the instant case according to the learned counsel for the ..... to 10 500 per annum 11 adverting next to the aspect of multiplier it is evident from the records that the age of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 17 2011 (HC)

The State of Maharshtra and ors Vs. Santosh Manohar Chavan and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-17-2011

..... and murder by giving false promises assurances and inducement of multiplying money in many flods 2 whether the prosecution has further ..... the accused were inducing the victims with the assurance of multiplying the cash currency in the magic programme once they were ..... the dreams of becoming millionaires over night and thus for multiplying money by charm spell and superpower iv the victims identified .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 08 2011 (HC)

Smt. Sangeeta Parihar. Vs. Smt. Suraj Parihar and ors.

Court: Rajasthan Jaipur

Decided on: Apr-08-2011

..... case if the insurance company were aggrieved by the erroneous multiplier applied or by the erroneous deduction made in the salary ..... hence the learned tribunal was certainly justified in applying a multiplier of 13 therefore the contention raised by the learned counsel ..... for the appellant that a higher multiplier should have been applied is unacceptable both mr tiwari and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Multiply - Judgment Search Results