Multiply - Judgment Search Results

Gulam Khader and Another Vs. United India Insurance Company Limited an ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2001ACJ163; ILR2000KAR4416; 2001(1)KarLJ340

..... matter in an average case this brings down the basic multiplier to the operative multiplier of 16 this multiplier of 16 would be the highest applicable if the ..... 32years141633 37years131538 42years121443 47years111348 52years101253 57years091158 62years081063 67years070968 72years060873 77years0507but the selection of multiplier cannot always depend on the age of the deceased where the dependants .....

Union of India and Others Vs. K.S. Lakshmi Kumar and Others

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2001ACJ134; ILR2000KAR3809; 2001(1)KarLJ91

..... the proper number of years purchase that is multiplier the choice of the multiplier is determined by the age of the deceased ..... annual dependency perpetually and made allowances to scale down the multiplier by taking into account the uncertainties of the future and ..... the annual dependency perpetually then allowance to scale down the multiplier would have to be made taking into account the uncertainties .....

A.C. Gupta and Another Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd and Others.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2000(56)DRJ724

..... age of the dependents and the normal life expectancy in the family while determining the multiplier on the basis of longevity discounting for various factors would be necessary these factors having ..... u p state road transport corpn s case supra the supreme court emphasised that the multiplier cannot exceed 18 years purchase factor now applying the aforesaid principles to the facts of .....

Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Kamlaben Valjibhai Vora

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 2002ACJ780; (2001)3GLR2528

..... be sounded in terms of money to augment the multiplicand while the chance of the multiplier is determined by two factors namely the rate of interest appropriate to a stable economy ..... death and future income and that should be considered for awarding compensation after considering necessary multiplier in this behalf 47 considering the aforesaid facts and proposition of law in the light .....

Saroja and ors. Vs. Mahalingappa and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2001ACJ1965

..... come to rs 2 700 per month and that after having been multiplied by 12 yearly loss of dependency would have been rs 32 ..... etc bringing the loss of monthly dependency roughly at rs 2 700 multiplied by 12 it comes to rs 32 400 yearly loss of ..... account while assessing damages but while calculating the compensation by using the multiplier method they fell into an error in deducting family pension as the .....

Airport Authority of India Vs. Satyagopal Roy and ors.

Court: Guwahati

..... of the yield from the trees or plantation 8 years multiplier shall be appropriate multiplier for agricultural land 12 years multiplier shall be suitable multiplier 12 in the present case the compensation is for ..... his usual fairness mr bhowmik learned counsel for the respondents has also submitted that the multiplier adopted by the arbitrator is admittedly on higher side 14 considering all aspects of .....

Airport Authority of India Vs. Satyagopal Roy and ors.

Court: Guwahati

..... of the yield from the trees or plantation 8 years multiplier shall be appropriate multiplier for agricultural land 12 years multiplier shall be suitable multiplier 12 in the present case the compensation is for ..... his usual fairness mr bhowmik learned counsel for the respondents has also submitted that the multiplier adopted by the arbitrator is admittedly on higher side 14 considering all aspects of .....

A.C. Syamala and Others Vs. Smt. Devaki Gopal and Others

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: I(2001)ACC513; 2001ACJ1432; ILR2001KAR306; 2001(4)KarLJ145

..... family the children and the wife etc the court further observed that multiplied by 12 months yearly loss of dependency came to rs 30 ..... that age of the claimant being as 45 the proper multiplier would be 11 and multiplying 30 000 by 11 the tribunal held that the ..... the income was rs 5 000 he further submitted that appliance of multiplier of 11 is unjustified and not in accordance with law learned .....

Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Vs. Malik Sartaj Wali Khan and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2001)10SCC660

..... rana4 this case holds scc p 694 para 5 ldquo the appropriate multiplier should be of 10 years as settled by several judgments of this ..... find in this case no dispute was raised for the 15 years multiplier either before the trial court or the high court since it was ..... decision would be of no avail for lending support that 15 years multiplier should be used 11 in view of the decisions of this court .....

S. Jayakumar and anr. Vs. Tamil Chelvi and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2002ACJ288; (2000)IIMLJ382

..... rs 17 700 the deceased was aged 30 years and the proper multiplier would be 18 the loss of income to the family would ..... the counsel for the claimants wants the court to maintain the same multiplier used by the tribunal in my view this contention cannot be ..... at the annual contribution to the family which may be multiplied by an actuarial multiplier suitable to the age of the deceased sums towards loss .....