Skip to content


Multiply - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: multiply Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 662 results (0.019 seconds)
Apr 29 2004 (HC)

Nalini and ors. Vs. Vijayprasad and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-29-2004

Reported in: 2006ACJ951; 2004(4)ALLMR70

..... family members he contended that though the tribunal correctly applied the multiplier of 15 years purchase factor the tribunal has wrongly assessed ..... at the time of the accident and therefore the application of multiplier of 15 years purchase factor would be just and reasonable ..... out to rs 66 000 though the claims tribunal had adopted multiplier of 15 years purchase factor and deducted half amount on .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 10 2004 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Vs. Mst. Sakina and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on: Jun-10-2004

Reported in: 2004(2)JKJ322

..... the respondents at the time of making submissions therefore the multiplier to the claim shall be applied 11 instead of 13 the ..... parents is to be taken into consideration while applying the multiplier the apex court in the case titled national insurance company v ..... to the loss of contribution or the pecuniary benefits the multiplier adopted by the tribunal and confirmed by the high court is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 07 2004 (HC)

Bina Pd. Sonari Vs. Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Apr-07-2004

..... proceeded the learned tribunal ought to have used 17 as the multiplier which would have been consistent with the requirements of the second ..... to be taken into consideration for the purpose of determining the multiplier applicable to the case since the claimant was 50 years old ..... 163a when an unmarried man dies and the claimant are parents multiplier which is lower will be adopted that is to say .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 29 2004 (HC)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Veluchamy and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-29-2004

Reported in: I(2006)ACC416

..... made following points arise for consideration i whether the tribunal is justified in applying the multiplier method while ascertaining compensation in the case of injury permanent disablement sustained due to ..... emerge from the above discussion a in all cases of injury or permanent disablement multiplier method cannot be mechanically applied to ascertain the future loss of income or earning .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 2004 (HC)

Kiran Devi and ors. Vs. Bhoora and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Dec-10-2004

Reported in: II(2005)ACC841

..... submits that in the instant case the learned tribunal applied the multiplier of 8 only whereas according to the provisions contained in second ..... in their case also while determining the amount of compensation the multiplier has been prescribed and so much so even in the case ..... 55 years therefore i am inclined to take into consideration the multiplier of 11 in the present facts and circumstances of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 17 2004 (SC)

Assistant Commissioner-cum-land Acquisition Officer, Bellary Vs. Sri S ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-17-2004

Reported in: AIR2005SC749; 2005(2)ALD6(SC); 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)293; 2005(1)AWC620(SC); JT2005(1)SC216; 2005(2)KarLJ370; 2005(1)KLT495(SC); (2005)9SCC662; (2005)1UPLBEC903

..... of fruit bearing trees the court held that if it is multiplied by capitalization of 15 years the claimant would be entitled to ..... the land on the basis of yield the court also applied multiplier of 10 9 learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in ..... veerabhadarappa this court determined compensation on the basis of 10 years multiplier again in krishi utpadan mandi samiti v malik sartaj wali khan .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 10 2004 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ravi Kant and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: May-10-2004

Reported in: III(2004)ACC355; 2006ACJ292; RLW2004(4)Raj2279; 2004(3)WLC489

..... of the said deceased was assessed as rs 24 000 and the multiplier of 15 was applied the learned counsel for the appellant also relied ..... loss caused due to the death of the victim in accident the multiplier looking to the age of the claimant may be applied which ..... get the compensation to the extent of total loss assessed by applying multiplier by taking into account the age of the deceased this depends .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 15 2004 (HC)

Radha Govind Singh Nagesh and ors. Vs. Md. Anjar and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Oct-15-2004

..... second schedule of the motor vehicle act 1988 according to which multiplier of 13 has been prescribed for calculating the amount of ..... the parents would also be relevant in the choice of the multiplier but these mistakes are limited to actual calculations only and ..... of other items what we propose to emphasis is that the multiplier cannot exceed 18 years purchase factor this is the improvement .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 15 2004 (HC)

Radha Govind Singh Nagesh and ors. Vs. Md. Anjar and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Oct-15-2004

Reported in: I(2005)ACC283; 2006ACJ557; [2005(1)JCR1(Jhr)]

..... second schedule of the motor vehicle act 1988 according to which multiplier of 13 has been prescribed for calculating the amount of ..... the parents would also be relevant in the choice of the multiplier but these mistakes are limited to actual calculations only and ..... of other items what we propose to emphasis is that the multiplier cannot exceed 18 years purchase factor this is the improvement .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 14 2004 (HC)

Hans Raj Setia (Died) Through Lrs. and ors. Vs. Land Acquisition Colle ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-14-2004

Reported in: (2005)140PLR142

..... any authenticated pronouncement of any judgment on this point so the multiplier of 12 will be justified and the compensation for orchard ..... determined by the government learned counsel also assailed the application of multiplier of 12 only and argued that the learned additional district ..... prove the life of the trees and as such the multiplier of 20 cannot be applied for grant of enhanced compensation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //