Skip to content
Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

May Laws - Judgment Search Results

Mar 04 2014

Law Vs. Siegel

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-04-2014

Siegel’s attorney’s fees. Pp. 5–12.      (a) A bankruptcy court may not exercise its authority to “carry out” the provisions of


1989

Laws Vs. Armontrout

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1989

LAWS v. ARMONTROUT - 490 U.S. 1040 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court


Jan 05 1925

Law Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-05-1925

district court is to be exercised in accordance with the laws governing the usual procedure of that court in actions at


1930

Laws Vs. Davis

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1930

B. Neff, et al. Supreme Court of the United States May 19, 1930 Mr. Walter A. DeCamp, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for … LAWS v. DAVIS - 281 U.S. 702 (1930) U.S. Supreme Court


1880

Hall Vs. Law

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1880

are desirous of having the same divided, it shall and may be lawful for the circuit court of the county where


1857

Snow Vs. Law

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1857

Ocean Queen. Page 61 U. S. 544 On the 18th May, 1854, the report of the commissioner was confirmed and a


1858

Rogers Vs. Law

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1858

February, 1857, and a writ of procedendo was issued 19 May, 1857. The appellants filed this record and docketed the case


1861

Rogers Vs. Law

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1861

value of the funds shall be ascertained and known, which may or shall come to their the trustees' hands in virtue


1861

Law Vs. Cross

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1861

THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Syllabus 1. An agent may sue his principal in his own name on the contract


1853

Adams Vs. Law

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1853

to this Court, on such terms as to your Honors may seem meet." MR. JUSTICE McLEAN delivered the opinion of the


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial