Laws Vs. Davis

Laws vs Davis

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1930

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/95327

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/95327
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1930
Case Number: 281 U.S. 702
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Laws

Respondent

Davis

Excerpt

laws v. davis - 281 u.s. 702 (1930) u.s. supreme court laws v. davis, 281 u.s. 702 (1930) 281 u.s. 702 no. 744. florence b. laws, appellant, v. eleanor bradford davis, blanche l. bradford, hannah b. neff, et al. supreme court of the united states may 19, 1930 mr. walter a. decamp, of cincinnati, ohio, for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the state court sought here to be reviewed is based on a non-federal ground adequate to support it. bilby v. stewart, 246 u.s. 255, 257 , 38 s. ct. 264; dibble v. bellingham bay land company, 163 u.s. 63 , 16 s. ct. 939.

Full Judgment

LAWS v. DAVIS - 281 U.S. 702 (1930)
U.S. Supreme Court LAWS v. DAVIS, 281 U.S. 702 (1930)

281 U.S. 702
No. 744.

Florence B. LAWS, appellant,
v.
Eleanor Bradford DAVIS, Blanche L. Bradford, Hannah B. Neff, et al.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 19, 1930

Mr. Walter A. DeCamp, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the State court sought here to be reviewed is based on a non-Federal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257 , 38 S. Ct. 264; Dibble v. Bellingham Bay Land Company, 163 U.S. 63 , 16 S. Ct. 939.

Same Parties Laws vs Davis Same Subject Land Acquisition