Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rogers Vs. Law

Rogers vs Law

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1858
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/80830

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
62 U.S. 526
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rogers

Respondent

Law

Excerpt

rogers v. law - 62 u.s. 526 (1858) u.s. supreme court rogers v. law, 62 u.s. 21 how. 526 526 (1858) rogers v. law 62 u.s. (21 how.) 526 appeal from the circuit court of the united states for the district of columbia syllabus after an appeal has been docketed and dismissed under the 63d rule of court at a prior term of the court, the same case cannot again be docketed without a new appeal. page 62 u. s. 527 mr. justice mc lean delivered the opinion of the court. the facts, as they appear of record, on the motion to dismiss this appeal, are as follows: the decree of the circuit court was pronounced 21 january, 1856. an appeal was prayed from said decree and granted the same day, 21 january, 1856. this appeal was docketed and dismissed under the 63d rule of this court, at december term, 1856, to-wit, 27 february, 1857, and a writ of procedendo was issued 19 may, 1857. the appellants filed this record and docketed the case 3 april, 1857. the record in this case stated that an appeal had been prayed and allowed, but does not give any date. there is no statement of any prior appeal in this record. the appeal bond is dated 4 february, 1856. there is no citation in this record. the appellants filed the citation and bond, 30 april, 1857, and directed the clerk to docket this case, to transfer the record filed in the last case to this, to attach said citation and bond to said record, and to print all the papers in this case. there is no statement of any other appeal than that set out, and this seems to be the appeal that was docketed and dismissed 27 february, 1857. as the record now stands, it is not perceived how this appeal can be sustained.

Full Judgment

Rogers v. Law - 62 U.S. 526 (1858)
U.S. Supreme Court Rogers v. Law, 62 U.S. 21 How. 526 526 (1858)

Rogers v. Law

62 U.S. (21 How.) 526

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SYLLABUS

After an appeal has been docketed and dismissed under the 63d rule of court at a prior term of the Court, the same case cannot again be docketed without a new appeal.

Page 62 U. S. 527

MR. JUSTICE Mc LEAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

The facts, as they appear of record, on the motion to dismiss this appeal, are as follows:

The decree of the circuit court was pronounced 21 January, 1856. An appeal was prayed from said decree and granted the same day, 21 January, 1856. This appeal was docketed and dismissed under the 63d rule of this Court, at December term, 1856, to-wit, 27 February, 1857, and a writ of procedendo was issued 19 May, 1857.

The appellants filed this record and docketed the case 3 April, 1857. The record in this case stated that an appeal had been prayed and allowed, but does not give any date. There is no statement of any prior appeal in this record. The appeal bond is dated 4 February, 1856. There is no citation in this record.

The appellants filed the citation and bond, 30 April, 1857, and directed the clerk to docket this case, to transfer the record filed in the last case to this, to attach said citation and bond to said record, and to print all the papers in this case. There is no statement of any other appeal than that set out, and this seems to be the appeal that was docketed and dismissed 27 February, 1857.

As the record now stands, it is not perceived how this appeal can be sustained.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial