Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK Writ Appeal No.145 of 2014 From the judgment and order dated 29.3.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.26820 of 2013. ----------Satyaranjan Mallick . Appellant Versus Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & others For the Appellant . Respondents Mr.Bibhu Pr.Tripathy, Advocate PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. A.K.GOEL AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH Date of hearing: 30.04.2014 : Date of judgment: 30.4.2014 Dr. A.K.Rath, J.This writ appeal has been filed under Clause-10 of the Letters Patent Act against the order dated 29.03.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.26820 of 2013. By the said order the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition and, thereby confirmed the decision of the Indian Oil Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as the IOCL), respondent no.4, rejecting the candidature of the appellant for regular LPG distributorship in respect of Betanoti area and consequential selection of respondent no....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK JCRLA No.22 of 2004 From the judgment dated 11.02.2004 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sundargarh in Sessions Trial No.141 of 1998. Routa Munda @ Mathura Appellant Versus State of Orissa For Appellant Respondent : M/s. B.L. Tripathy, Miss B.P.Tripathy and Miss N.Tripathy For Respondent : Mr. Bishnu Prasad Pradhan, (Addl. Government Advocate) P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADIP MOHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of Judgment: 30.04.2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Biswajit Mohanty, J.This Jail Criminal Appeal is directed against the judgment dated 11.02.2004 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sundargarh in Sessions Trial No.141 of 1998 convicting the appellant under Section 302 of I.P.C. and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of R...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. W.P.(C) No.12072 of 2012 In The matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. --------Balakrushna Polai Petitioner - VersusNational Bank of Agricultural and Rural Development, represented through Chairman,Mumbai and others. For Petitioner : For Opp.Parties : Opposite Parties M/s Sandeep Parida and Deepali Mohapatra. Sri J.K.Tripathy,Sr.Advocate, B.P.Tripathy, D.Pradhan, G.S.Das and P.Tripathy. --------- PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.K. PATEL --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing: 07.03.2014 :: Date of judgment: 23.04.2014 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------B.K. PATEL, J.In this writ petition, petitioner has made prayer to quash Annexure-10 dated 11.8.2011 by which he was discharged from the services of National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) and Annexure-12 dated 15.5.2012 by...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.1638 of 2006 In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. __________ Union of India, represented through its Director General, Posts, Ministry of Communication, Department of Posts, Dak Bhawan, New Delhi 110001 & others Petitioners. -VersusSri Pradeep Kumar Sahoo For petitioner : For Opp. Party : Opposite Party. Mr. S.D.Das, Asst. Solicitor General of India M/s D.P.Dhalasamanta ------------ P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment : 22.04.2014 B.N. Mahapatra, J.In the present writ petition, challenge has been made to the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack (for short, the Tribunal) dated 01.04.2005 passed in O.A. No.52 of 2004 on the ground that the said order is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of law.2. Petitioners case in a nutshell is that the opposite party Sri Pradeep Kumar Sahoo was appointed prov...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.1637 of 2006 In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. __________ Union of India, represented through its Director General, Posts, Ministry of Communication, Department of Posts, Dak Bhawan, New Delhi 110001 & others Petitioners -VersusSri Santosh Kumar Rout For petitioner : For Opp. Party : Opposite Party Mr. S.D.Das, Asst. Solicitor General of India M/s D.P.Dhalasamanta ------------ P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment : 22.04.2014 B.N.Mahapatra, J.In the present writ petition, challenge has been made to the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack (for short, the Tribunal) dated 01.04.2005 passed in O.A. No.53 of 2004 on the ground that the said order is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of law.2. Petitioners case in a nutshell is that the opposite party Sri Santosh Kumar Rout was appointed provision...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK O.J.C. No.6353 of 1998 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. ---------- G.S. Srivastav Petitioner -versusUnion of India and others Opp.Parties For Petitioner : M/s. C.R. Mishra, Mr.G. Mishra, T.K. Mandal, Mr. T.K. Mishra. For Opp.Parties : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Patra, Central Govt. Standing Counsel PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing: 02.04.2014| Date of judgment : 22.04.2014 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.The petitioner, who was working as a Constable in C.I.S.F. filed this application challenging the order of imposition of major penalty of removal from service by the disciplinary authority under Annexure-5 dated 18.6.1996 and confirmation thereof in appeal vide Annexure-7 dated 17.12.1996 and reaffirmation in Revision under Annexure-9 dated 8.12.1997 on the ground that the same is in gross 2 violation of principle of natural justice. Accordingly, he seeks for quashing of the same.2. The epitome o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. W.P.(C) No.26898 OF 2013 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ----------Minarva Dash, represented by her father guardian Petitioner Opp. Parties -VersusDirector of Ayush and four others For Petitioner : For Opp. Parties : M/s. R.K. Patnaik, B. Jally, J.K. Dwibedy and U. Pattnaik Addl. Government Advocate (For Ops 1, 4 &5) M/s. S. Palit, A.K. Mahana, A. Mishra, Miss R. Tripathy & A. Parija (For O.P.2) M/s . P.K.Sahoo (For Nursinghanath Ayurved College & Research Institute, Paikmal, Bargarh) ----------P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment: 22.04.2014 B.N. MAHAPATRA, J.This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to issue a writ of mandamus directing opposite party No.1-Director of Ayush, Government of Odisha, Bhubaneswar to allow the petitioner to take 2 admission in Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery Course (for shor...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. W.P.(C) No.26896 OF 2013 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. --------------Raktimabha Jena, represented by her father guardian Petitioner Opp. Parties -VersusDirector of Ayush and four others For Petitioner For Opp. Parties: : M/s. R.K. Patnaik, B. Jally, J.K. Dwibedy and U. Pattnaik Addl. Government Advocate (For O.P.1) M/s. S. Palit, A.K. Mahana, A.Mishra, Miss R. Tripathy & A.Parija (for O.P.2) --------------- P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment: 22.04.2014 B.N. MAHAPATRA, J.This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to issue a writ of mandamus directing opposite party No.1-Director of Ayush, Government of Odisha, Bhubaneswar to allow the petitioner to take admission in Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery Course (for short BAMS) either at Gopabandhu Ayurvedic Mahavidyalaya, Puri or KATS Ayurvedic College, Ank...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK F.A.O. NO.86 OF 2013 (From the judgment dated 14.01.2011 passed by Shri P.K. Ray, Presiding Officer, State Education Tribunal, Orissa, Bhubaneswar in G.I.A. Case No.171 of 2008) -------------State of Orissa and another . Appellants Respondents -VersusSmt. Bishnupriya Routray and another For Appellants : Mr. S. Das, Addl. Govt. Advocate For Respondents : M/s. B. Routray, Sr. Advocate, Mr. P.K. Sahoo, Mr. S. Das, Mr. S.Jena, Mr. S.K. Samal, Mr. S.P. Nath, Mr. S. Rout. (For Respondent No.1) PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI ------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing : 09.04.2014 :: Date of judgment : 22.04.2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J.Assailing the order dated 14.01.2011 passed by the Presiding Officer, State Education Tribunal in GIA Case No.171 of 2008, the State of Orissa has preferred this appeal under Section 24C of the Oriss...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. W.P.(C) No.1562 OF 2008 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Suvendu Kumar Mohanta . Petitioner - VersusUnion of India & Others . Opp. parties For petitioner : M/s A.C.Mohanty, G.N.Rout, B.Pradhan & S.Bhagat For opp. parties : Mr. S.K.Patra, Central Govt. Advocate PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE S.PUJAHARI Date of hearing 16.04.2014 S.PUJAHARI,J.: Date of judgment 21.04.2014 The petitioner in this writ petition challenges the order dated 18.3.2006 passed by opposite party no.4 at Annexure-9, imposing the punishment of removal from service in a disciplinary proceeding initiated against him vide Annexure-5 and prayed for quashing the same and also direct the opposite parties to reinstate him in service with back wages .2. Facts relevant for disposal of the writ petition are as follows:The petitioner was enrolled as a constable in 26 Battalion, Central Reserve...
Tag this Judgment!