Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK O.J.C. Nos. 590 of 2000 and O.J.C. No.15057 of 1999 An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ---------In O.J.C. No.590 of 2000 Narendra Kumar Ratha and others Petitioners -versusState of Orissa and others Opposite Parties For Petitioners : M/s. P.K. Ray, P.K. Panda For Opposite Party No.1 : Mr. A.K. Mishra Addl. Govt. Advocate For Opposite Party No.2 : Mr. S.K.Nayak-1, Sr. Counsel. In O.J.C. No.15057 of 1999 Ganesh Ram Pradhan and others Petitioners -versusState of Orissa and others Opposite Parties For Petitioners : M/s. P.K. Ray, P.K. Panda For Opposite Party No.1 : Mr. A.K. Mishra Addl. Govt. Advocate For Opposite Party No.2 : Mr. S.K.Nayak-1, Sr. Counsel _____________________ 2 PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing: 10.09.2014 | Date of judgment : 26.09.2014 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.Both the writ applications having arisen out of same cause of action were heard together and are disposed of by this com...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK. W.P.(C) No.13723 OF 2014 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ----------M/s. Unit Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. Petitioner -VersusThe Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Orissa, Cuttack and two others For Petitioner : For Opp. Parties : Opp. Parties M/s. A.N. Das, S.K. Raychoudhury & S. Satpathy Mr. R.P. Kar, Standing Counsel [For O.P.-Revenue]. -----------P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment: 26.09.2014 B.N. MAHAPATRA, J.In the present writ petition, challenge has been made to the order dated 14.5.2014 passed under Annexure-3 by which opposite party No.3-Sales Tax Officer, Bhubaneswar II Circle, Bhubaneswar informed the petitioner that as per provisions under Section 60 (1) of the OVAT Act, the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Odisha, Cuttack has been pleased to withhold the refund claim of Rs. 26,86,357/- for the 2 period from 1.10...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK W.A. Nos. 180 and 186 of 2012 In the matter of appeals under Article 4 of Orissa High Court Order, 1948 read with Clause-10 of the Letter Patent and Chapter-III, Rule-6 of Orissa High Court Rules. ---------In W.A. No.180 of 2012 Vice Chairman, State Council for Technical Education Education & Vocational Training (S.C.T.E. & V.T.), Odisha -versus- Appellant Manorama Institute of Industrial Training & Engineering, Represented through its Secretary Hemanta Kumar Sarangi. Respondent For Appellant : Mr. B.M. Pattnaik, Sr. Counsel For Respondent : M/s. B. Routray, D.Routray, P.K. Sahoo, S.D.Das, S.Jena. For InterveNo.: Mr. A.K. Bose, Asst. Solicitor General. In W.A. No.186 of 2012 Vice Chairman, State Council for Technical Education Education & Vocational Training (S.C.T.E. & V.T.), Odisha Appellant -versusNarendra Nayak and others Respondents For Appellant : Mr. B.M. Pattnaik, Sr. Counsel For Respondents (1 to 9 & 11 and12) : M/s. D. Mund, P.K. Mahali, S.N. Pa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK O.J.C. No.10093 of 2001 & W.P.(C) No.5643 of 2002 An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ---------In O.J.C. No.10093 of 2001 Binan Kumar Mohanty & others -versus- Petitioners Water & Land Management Institute (WALMI) & others Opposite Parties For Petitioners For Opposite Party Nos.1& 2 For Opposite Party No.3 : M/s. J.K. Rath (Sr.Adv.), S.N. Rath, P.K. Rout, S. MIshra, C.K.Rajguru & D.N. Rath. : M/s. S.K. Nayak, B.K. Sahoo, M.S. Sahoo, Miss M. Bhanja & Miss D. Nayak. : Mr. S. Kanungo, Addl. Govt. Advocate In W.P.(C). No.5643 of 2002 Nikhil Kumar Panda & others .. Petitioners -versusState of Orissa & others .. Opposite Parties For Petitioner : M/s. J.K. Rath (Sr.Adv.), S.N. Rath, P.K. Rout, C.K. Rajguru & S. MIshra Mr. S. Kanungo, Addl. Govt. Advocate. For Opp. Party No.1 : For Opp.Party nos.2 & 3 : M/s. S.K. Nayak, B.K. Sahoo, M.S. Sahoo, Miss M. Bhanja & Miss D. Nayak. _____________________ PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTI...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.6245 of 2014 In the matter of an application under Articles 226, 227 of the Constitution of India. -------Deo Ispat Alloys Limited, Bhawanipur, Kirei, Dist: Sundargarh, Represented by its Director, Sri Chandrakant Choudhury Petitioner -VersusCommissioner of Commercial Taxes, Orissa, Banijyakar Bhawan, Cantonment Road, Cuttack and others Opp. Parties For Petitioner : Mr. Damodar Pati For Opp. Parties : Mr. R.P.Kar, Standing Counsel (Commercial Taxes Deptt.) ---------P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.N.MAHAPATRA Date of Order : 26.09.2014 B.N. Mahapatra, J.This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to quash the order of assessment dated 26.11.2013 passed by the Sales Tax Officer, Rourkela Circle, Panposh under Section 43 of the Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2014 (for short, the OVAT Act) for the period from 01.04.2009 to 2 06.09.2012 on the ground that the said order is illegal, arbitrary a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK F.A.O. No.179 of 2012 Appeal under Section 24-C of the Orissa Education Act,1969. ---------Smita Rout Appellant -versusState of Orissa and others Respondents _____________ For Appellant : For Respondents : M/s. Sameer Kumar Das, S.K. Mishra. M/s A.K. Mishra, Addl. Govt. Advocate (for Res.No.1 &2) M/s.D.Routray, P.K.Sahu, S.Das, S.Jena, K.Mohanty, S.K.Samal, S.Rout ______________ (for Res.No.4) PRESENT:- THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI ____________________________________________________________ Date of hearing: 03.09.2014 : Date of judgment :26.09.2014 ____________________________________________________________ Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.The applicant in GIA Case No.354 of 2011 in State Education Tribunal, Orissa has filed this appeal impugning the judgment dated 17.3.2012 (Annexure-17) passed by the Presiding Officer, State Education Tribunal in the said G.I.A Case upholding the order passed by the Director, Higher Education, Odisha (opposite party no.2) decl...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK SECOND APPEAL NO.231 OF 2001 From the judgment and decree dated 3.7.2001 and 13.7.2001, respectively, passed by Shri A.C. Pattnaik, Additional District Judge, Jagatsinghpur in T. A. Case No.9 of 1998 reversing the judgment and decree dated 20.1.1998 and 7.2.1998, respectively, passed by Smt. V. Jayashree, Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jagatsinghpur in T.S. No.167 of 1997. __________ Rahas Das Appellant Versus Chairman, Paradip Port Trust, Paradip and another For Appellant Respondents : M/s. Budhadev Routray, A.K. Baral, D.K. Mohapatra & P.K. Das For Respondents : M/s. S.K. Padhi, Miss D. Mohapatra, B.K. Sahoo & D. Das PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHUBIR DASH Date of hearing : 8.9.2014 Date of judgment : 26.09.2014 R. DASH, J.Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 3.7.2001 and 13.7.2001, respectively, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Jagatsinghpur in T.A. Case No.9 of 1998 reversing the judgment and decree dated 20.1.1998...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.12934 of 2007 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. __________ M/s. Bengal Tools Limited . Petitioner -VersusMahanadi Coalfields Limited and others For the petitioner For the Opp.parties . : Opp. Parties Mr Ashok Mohanty, Senior Advocate, M/s. B.K. Sharma, A.K. Mohapatra, R.K. Sahu and Meetali Jesthi : M/s. Sanjeet Mohanty, N.C. Sahoo, S.Mohanty, R.R. Swain and A.Mohapatra ___________ PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Decided on : 25.09.2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -2- Amitava Roy, C.J.Appalled by the perceived wrongful invocation of the Price Fall Clause contained in the Terms and Conditions governing the transaction of the Belt Conveyors to the opp. party-Mahanadi Coalfields Limited (fo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK F.A.O. NOS.161 & 370 OF 2014 From a common order dated 15.3.2014 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Baripada in I.A. No.19 of 2014 arising out of C.S. No.72 of 2014. __________ In F.A.O. No.161 of 2014 Satya Prakash Mahana & others Appellants Versus Rabikanta Singh & another For Appellants : For Respondents : Respondents M/s. P.K. Rath, R.N. Parija, A.K. Rout, S.K. Pattnaik, A. Behera & P.K. Sahoo M/s. N. Lenka, A.K. Otta, R. Lenka, H.K. Mahanta, L. Sahu & N. Behera In F.A.O. No.370 of 2014 Rabikanta Singh & another Appellants Versus Satya Prakash Mahana & others For Appellants Respondents : M/s. N. Lenka, H.K. Mahanta, L. Sahu N. Behera & R. Lenka For Respondents : M/s. P.K. Rath, R.N. Parija, A.K. Rout, S.K. Pattnaik, A. Behera & P.K. Sahoo PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHUBIR DASH Date of hearing : 15.09.2014 Date of judgment : 25.09.2014 2 R. DASH, J.Both the appeals arise out of order dated 15.3.2014 passed by the learned C...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK F.A.O. NO.100 OF 2009 From the order dated 6.01.2009 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhadrak in Misc. Case No.101 of 1998 arising out of O.S.No.327 of 1996. __________ Niranjan Behera Appellant Versus Sri Sudarsan Bandha & others For Appellant Respondents : M/s.Prahlad Kar, G. Kar, A. K. Mohanty & K. Khuntia. For Respondents : M/s. Sushant Kumar Pradhan, & S.B. Mohanta. PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHUBIR DASH Date of hearing : 17.09.2014 R. DASH, J.Date of judgment : 25.09.2014 This appeal is against order dated 6.01.2009 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhadrak in Misc. Case No.101 of 1998 a proceeding under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C., arising out of O.S. No.327 of 1996 rejecting the appellants prayer for substitution.2. The appellant herein is defendant No.17 in the suit and the petitioner in the proceeding under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C. The suit is for partition of the suit property and for permanent injunction with ...
Tag this Judgment!