Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK W.P.(C ) No.4722 of 2013 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ------------Budhiram Ho . Petitioner Versus State of Orissa and others . Opposite parties For Petitioner -- Mr.M.K.Mohanty, Advocate For Opp. Parties -- Mr.S.N.Mohapatra, Standing Counsel for S & ME. (For O.Ps. 1 to3) Mr.A.K.Biswal, Advocate (For O.P.4) PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH Date of hearing: 4.9.2014 : Date of judgment: 10.9.2014 DR.A.K.RATH, J.In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed, inter alia, for issuance of a writ of mandamus to the opposite parties to take immediate action for dismissal of opposite party no.4 from Government service as per Rule 18 read with Rule 2 13 of the Orissa Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1962.2. Bereft of unnecessary details, the short facts of the case of t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK WRIT APPEAL No.152 of 2014 This appeal arises out of the order dated 3.4.2014 passed by the Honble Single Judge in W.P(C) No.19810 of 2009. ---------Smt. Pratima Kumari Devi Appellant -versusState of Odisha and others _______________ Respondent For Appellant : M/s.Arun Kumar Acharya and S.Mishra. For Respondents : Mr. Pravat Kumar Muduli, Additional Standing Counsel (for Respondent Nos.1 to 4), M/s.Upendra Kumar Samal, C.D.Sahoo S.P.Patra and Mrs.S.Nayak (for Respondent No.5), P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADIP MOHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY Date of Judgment : 21.08.2014 Biswajit Mohanty,J.The present writ appeal has been filed by the selected candidate (appellant) with a prayer for setting aside the order dated 3.4.2014 passed by the Honble Single Judge in W.P.(C ) No.19810 of 2009. Vide order dated 3.4.2014, the Honble Single Judge quashed the order dated 7.11.2009 passed by the Sub-Collector, Athagarh (Respondent ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK C.M.P NO.213 OF 2014 (In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India) ----------------------------Narayan Chandra Sahu Petitioners -Vs- Radhashyam Maheswar and others Opp. Parties ----------------------------For Petitioners For Opp. Party No.1 : M/s. Prasanna Kumar Swain, and N.Behera : M/s B.Bhuyan, S.Patra and B.N.Mishra -----------------------------PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE KUMARI JUSTICE S.PANDA Date of Judgment : 20.08.2014 S.Panda, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 31.8.2013 passed by the learned 3rd Addl. District Judge, Cuttack in T.A No.93 of 1999 allowing an application filed by the opposite party no.1 under Order 22, Rule 4 (4) of C.P.C for exemption from substituting the legal heirs of the deceased defendant no.1, who died on 19.1.2013. 2 2. The facts leading to the present case are that opposite party no.1 as plaintiff filed T.S No.284 of 1990...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK Writ Appeal (Civil) No.36 of 2013 In the matter of an appeal under Article 4 of the Orissa High Court Order, 1948 read with Clause 10 of the Letter Patent Constituting the High Court of Judicature at Patna. ---------Urmila Das Appellant -versusState of Odisha and others For appellant : For respondents : Respondents M/s. Sujata Jena, G.B. Jena and P. Dash M/s. P.K. Das, H.B. Dash and, A.C.B. Das (For Opp. No.6) PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing: 13.08.2014| Date of judgment : 19.08.2014 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.This appeal challenges the order of the learned Single Judge dated 7.1.2013 in W.P.(C) No.22553 of 2011.2. The factual backdrop is that an advertisement bearing notification No.225 dated 19.02.2009 was floated by the C.D.P.O., Mahanga, respondent no.5, vide Annexure-1 inviting applications for filling up of a post of Anganwadi Worker which related to Hansadia Mundasahi Addit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK W.P.(C) Nos. 15174, 15175, 15176, 15178 & 15181 of 2014 Aapplications under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. W.P.(C) No.15174/2014 M/s. Yazdani International Pvt.Ltd. & Anr. .. Petitioners -VersusState of Odisha & two others. .. Opp.Parties. W.P.(C) No.15175/2014 M/s. Aliza International Pvt.Ltd. & Anr. .. Petitioners -VersusState of Odisha & two others. .. Opp.Parties. W.P.(C) No.15176/2014 M/s. K.K. Resources Pvt.Ltd. & Anr. .. Petitioners -VersusState of Odisha & two others. .. Opp.Parties. W.P.(C) No.15178/2014 Sri Lakshmi Constructios Pvt.Ltd. & Anr. .. Petitioners -VersusParadip Port Trust & Anr. .. Opp.Parties. W.P.(C) No.15181/2014 M/s. Royalline Resources Ltd. & Anr. .. Petitioners -VersusState of Odisha & two others. .. Opp.Parties. Advocates: For the petitioners For the opp.parties Mr. Jagannath Patnaik, Sr. Adv. M/s. P.K. Dash & A. Patnaik. . None. -2- PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONBL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK CONTC No.1808 of 2010 An application U/s. 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act arising out of OJ.No.4964 of 1996 disposed of on 15.7.2008. Grantha Pasayat .. Petitioner -VersusRajendra Prasad Gupta, Chief General Manager, MCL. . Opp.Party. For the petitioner M/s. Dayananda Mohapatra, M. Mohapatra, G. Mohapatra, S.P. Nath & L. Nanda. For the opp.party Mr. Naresh Chandra Sahoo. PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONBLE DR JUSTICE B. R. SARANGI ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing : 12.08.2014 Date of Judgment : 19.08.2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------AMITAVA ROY, C.J.The petitioner alleges herein deliberate non-compliance of the judgment and order dated 15.07.2008 passed in O.J.C. No.4964 of 1996 (since modified by orders dated 29.1.2010 and 29.6.2010 in Misc. Case Nos. 534 of 2009 and 238 of 2010 respectively).2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK. W.P.(C) NO.11267 of 2005 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ------M/s IPISTEEL Limited and another. - Petitioners Versus- Central Electricity Supply Company of Orissa Limited and another Opposite Parties For Petitioners : M/s Umesh Ch. Pattnaik, S.D. Mishra and S.Patnaik For Opp. Parties : Mr. R.K.Rath M/s. B.K.Nayak and D.K.Mohanty PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.K. PATEL Date of Judgment 19.08.2014 B.K. PATEL, J.In this writ application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioners have made prayer for the following reliefs:In the circumstances, it is therefore prayed that this Honble would graciously be pleased to examine the aforesaid facts and issue a writ of Mandamus commanding CESCO, Opposite Party No.1 to implement the Revised Rehabilitation Scheme sanctioned by BIFR vide Annexure-1 which was communicated to all the concerned parties by the Registrar, BIFR. AND...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK Writ Appeal (Civil) No.86 of 2014 In the matter of an appeal under Article 4 of the Orissa High Court Order, 1948 read with Clause 10 of the Letter Patent Constituting the High Court of Judicature at Patna. ---------Sanjukta Devi Appellant -versusState of Odisha and others For Appellant Respondents : M/s. A.R. Dash, P.K. Nayak, H.B. Dash, A.C.R. Das, B.Mohapatra, S.K.Nanda-1. For Respondents: Mr. P.K. Muduli, Addl. Standing Counsel (for Res.Nos.1 to4) M/s. Gautam Kumar Routray (for Res.No.5) PRESENT: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing: 13.08.2014| Date of judgment : 19.08.2014 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.Opposite party no.6 in W.P.(C) No.20754 of 2010 has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 7.3.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in the said 2 W.P.(C) and for quashing of the order dated 19.10.2010 passed by the Sub-Collector, Cuttack, respondent no.2 in the Writ Appeal selecting resp...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK OJ.No.11403 of 2000 Bhakta Bandhu Ghadei .. Petitioner -VersusDistrict Judge, Cuttack & Anr. .. Opp.Parties. For the petitioner Mr. S.S.Das & R.C.Mishra, For the opp.parties Mr. Patnaik, Addl.Govt.Advocate PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing : 13.08.2014 Date of Judgment : 19.08.2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AMITAVA ROY, C.J.The petitioner, who was appointed as Lower Division Clerk in the office of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jajpur under the judgeship of Cuttack has put to challenge his removal from service by way of disciplinary measure.2. We have heard Mr. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and also Mr. Patnaik, learned counsel for the opposite party.3. The skeletal facts are that the petitioner, while was serving i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK WRIT APPEAL (CIVIL) No.287 OF 2010 In the matter of an appeal under Article 4 of the Orissa High Court Order, 1948 read with Clause 10 of the Letter Patent Constituting the High Court of Judicature at Patna. ------------------Padmabati Naik and others Appellants Respondents - versus Goudagaon Primary School and others For Appellants: M/s. Banmali Sahoo, N. Lenka, A. Parida, S.K. Mohapatra For Respondents: M/s. S.P. Mishra, S. Nanda, S. Mohanty, B.S. Panigrahi, A.K. Das PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing: 12.08.2014 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.: Date of Judgment: 19.08.2014 Opposite parties 4 to 8 in W.P.(C) No.1248 of 2009 are the appellants in this Writ Appeal challenging the order dated 14.09.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in the said W.P.(C).2. by W.P.(C) No.1248 of 2009 was filed before this Court the present respondent no.1, Gaudagaon Primary School challenging the order...
Tag this Judgment!