Lottery - Judgment Search Results

MartIn Lottery Agencies Ltd. Represented HereIn by Power of Attorney S ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(5)ALLMR627; 2009(1)BomCR381; 2008(5)MhLj409

State Government then offered the sole distributorship to the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 357/2000, i.e. M/s. Martin Lottery Agencies on the same condition, namely that it would be subject to the final result in Writ Petition

Directorate of Small Savings and Lotteries Govt of Vs. Nirmal Lotterie ...

Court: Delhi

as a condition of the contract under which the respondent was acting as the stockist for a weekly lottery scheme launched by the appellant. While invoking the bank guarantee the appellant had quantified the demand as under:i)

Kerala State Lottery Agents and Sellers Welfare Board vs C.N.Purushoth ...

Court: Kerala

ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.22362 OF 2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS 2-3: 1 KERALA STATE LOTTERY AGENTS AND SELLERS WELFARE BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 3RD FLOOR, KSRTC BUILDING, THAMPANOOR, 2 WELFARE

MartIn Lottery Agencies Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Sikkim

Reported in: 2007[8]STR561; [2008]14STT242; (2009)24VST24(NULL)

(8) S.T.R. 562 (Sikkim). The basic facts are set out there. The arguments this time centered out whether lottery tickets are goods or not. The statutory provisions which are material in this regard are extracted in my

MartIn Lottery Agencies Ltd. and ors. Vs. S. Manimaran, Editor, Athirs ...

Court: Sikkim

Reported in: 2005CriLJ3146

is relevant and accordingly, it is quoted below:--'TRANSFER PETITION (CRL) NO. 608 OF 2002S. Manimaran and Anr. Petitioner(s)Versus.Martin Lottery Agencies Ltd. and Ors. Respondent(s) with TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) No. 282/2003 - - It is also argued that

MartIn Lottery Agencies Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Sikkim

Reported in: 2007[8]STR562

30-4-2007 written by the Superintendent of Central Excise, Gangtok Range, Gangtok to the writ petitioner, namely, M/s. Martin Lottery Agencies Ltd. The letter is no more than a direction for appearance before the writer of the letter.

Delhi Lotteries Vs. Rajesh Aggarwal and Others

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1997VIAD(Delhi)529; AIR1998Delhi332; [1999]97CompCas758(Delhi); 69(1997)DLT543; 1997(43)DRJ448

Shamim J. 1. This petition under article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by Delhi Lottery (hereinafter referred as the petitioner in order to facilitate the reference) against the judgment and order dated March

Devdhan Lottery Services (Dls) Vs. the State of Kerala and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2009(3)KLJ479

Matched in: Parties Devdhan Lottery Services (Dls) Vs. the State of Kerala and ors.

K. Purushothaman Lottery Agency and anr. Vs. Union Territory of Pondic ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR2004Mad435

19 of 1998 dated 26-6-1998 issued by the first respondent by which the sale of tickets of a lottery organised, conducted or promoted by any other State within the Union Territory Pondicherry, has been prohibited.2. The lotteries

Ranga Rao Lottery Agencies Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2006]287ITR542(Mad)

Matched in: Parties Ranga Rao Lottery Agencies Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax