Lottery - Judgment Search Results

MartIn Lottery Agencies Ltd. Represented HereIn by Power of Attorney S ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(5)ALLMR627; 2009(1)BomCR381; 2008(5)MhLj409

the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 357/2000, i.e. M/s. Martin Lottery Agencies on the same condition, namely that it would be

Directorate of Small Savings and Lotteries Govt of Vs. Nirmal Lotterie ...

Court: Delhi

the plaintiff with the defendant for running the Bhagyanidhi Weekly Lottery and is an admitted document, shows that Column No.10 captioned

Haryana State Lotteries, Iqbal Chand Khurana, M/S K and Co., M/S. Sunr ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1998(46)DRJ397

us for long inasmuch as we have already held that lottery tickets are goods, taxable as such. The impugned tax is

Lottery Case

Court: US Supreme Court

and stipulations ceased to be vendible under the law. So lottery tickets forbidden to be issued or dealt in by the

Maa Vaishnav Lotteries Agencies Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1998(2)AWC1137; (1998)2UPLBEC1047

is devastating society because poor people have become addicted to lottery and their hard earned money is not given to their

Gujarat Lottery Sellers Association Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1998)1GLR10

R.A. Mehta, J.1. The petitioner. Gujarat Lottery Sellers Association has by this petition challenged the Constitutional validity

Maa Vaishnav Lotteries Agency Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1998(2)AWC1134; (1998)2UPLBEC1039

This petition and all other petitions relating to Nagaland State Lotteries and lotteries of other States whether listed before us or

Jithendra Lottery Agency Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the C ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1991)2MLJ595

there any restriction for the dealer to deal with the lottery tickets. Hence the allegation that the impugned sub-rules are violative

Delhi Lotteries Vs. Rajesh Aggarwal and Others

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1997VIAD(Delhi)529; AIR1998Delhi332; [1999]97CompCas758(Delhi); 69(1997)DLT543; 1997(43)DRJ448

their letter dated March 7, 1994, for the sale of lottery tickets of Delhi Lotteries in the State of Punjab. He

Jithendra Lottery Agency and Others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1991)IIMLJ595

rules. 6. The respondents in their counter-affidavit stated that the lottery tickets are taxable at 20 per cent single point at