Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK MATA No.110 of 2013 An application under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Suvendu Sekhar Mohapatra Appellant versus Smrutirekha Mohapatra Respondent For Appellant : In person. For Respondent : M/s. Bijaya Kumar Behera(2), A. Mohanty and S.N. Mishra. PRESENT: THE HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE VINo.PRASAD AND THE HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH Date of hearing : BISWANATH RATH, J.25.07.2014 Date of Judgment : 25.09.2014 In this appeal, the appellant-husband has assailed the judgment dated 24.12.2012 passed in C.P. No.125 of 2011 by the Family Court, Berhampur, Ganjam on an application filed under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for a decree of divorce dissolving the marriage of the appellant with the respondent-wife. 2 2. The case of the husband before the Family Court was that he got married as per the Hindu Customs and rites on 17.04.2006 at Berhampur. He was a well settled software engineer and hailed from a respective family. He specific...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.2971 of 2009 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. -------------M/s Delhi Foot Wear, Shiv Bazar, Cuttack ..... Petitioner -VersusSales Tax Officer, Vigilance, Cuttack & others ..... Opposite Parties For petitioner : M/s. P.K.Jena & S.C. Sahoo For Opp. Parties : Mr.R.P.Kar, Standing Counsel [For O.P.-Revenue]. -----------P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment: 25.09.2014 B.N. Mahapatra, J.This writ petition has been filed with a prayer for quashing the order of assessment dated 12.01.2007 passed by the Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack-1 Range, Cuttack under Annexure-1 on the ground that the said order is barred by limitation and has been passed without complying with the statutory requirement of Section 42(2) of the OVAT Act. 2 2. Petitioners case in a nutshell is that it is a proprietorship concern dealing with Foot Wear on wh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
AFR HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK CRIMINAL APPEAL No.234 OF 1996 From the judgment and order dated 26.02.1996 passed by Shri R.N.Bhuyan, Additional Sessions Judge, Sambalpur in S.T. Case No.180/39 of 1994. -------- Abhiram Rohidas and others ...... Appellants Versus State of Orissa Respondent For appellant nos. 1 & 3 - Mr. B.K.Ragada For appellant no.2 - Mr. H.S. Mishra For respondent - Sk. Zafrulla, Addl. Standing Counsel PRESENT:THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VINo.PRASAD AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE BISWANAT RATH ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing: 05.08.2014: Date of judgment: 25.09.2014 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------VINo.PRASAD, J.This appeal by the three appellants, namely, Abhiram Rohidas(A1),Bhabani Shankar Kumra (A2) and Dara Seth(A3), is directed against the impugned judgement of conviction and order of sentence dated 26.2.96, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, district Sa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK. W.P.(C) No.22037 of 2013 An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ---------- Debarchan Pradhan Petitioner Versus Odisha Forest Development Corporation Ltd. & two Others Opposite Parties For Petitioner : M/s Janmejaya Katikia, A. Mohanty, P. Mohanty and S.Swain For Opp. Parties : M/s. S.K. Pattanaik. (for opposite party nos.1 and2) ---------- PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of hearing : 28.08.2014 Date of Judgment : 24.09.2014 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Biswanath Rath, J.By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order no.35 dated 30.4.2012 under Annexure-7 passed by opposite party no.3 the disciplinary authority, the order dated 06.08.2013 passed by opposite party no.2 the Appellate authority under Annexure-11 an...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK W.A. No.466 of 2013 In the matter of an appeal under Article 4 of the Orissa High Court Order, 1948 read with Clause 10 of the Letter Patent Constituting the High Court of Judicature at Patna. ---------Arun Kumar Appellant -versusN. Nirmala Devi and others For appellant : For respondents : Respondents M/s. S.S. Rao & B.K. Mohanty M/s. C.A. Rao, S.K. Behera & S.K.Parida ( for respondent Nos.1 &2) PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing: 15.09.2014 & Date of judgment: 24.09.2014 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.The plaintiff-writ petitioner has filed this appeal challenging the judgment dated 7.1.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.11696 of 2013 dismissing the same on the ground of maintainability stating inter alia that order of rejection of a plaint being a decree, as defined under Section 2(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, the same is appealable. 2 2. The pleaded facts as a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK W.A. No.304 of 2014 In the matter of an appeal under Article 4 of the Orissa High Court Order, 1948 read with Clause 10 of the Letter Patent Constituting the High Court of Judicature at Patna. ---------Manaswini Baliarsingh Appellant -VersusState of Odisha and others Respondents For Appellant : Mr. P.Acharya, Sr.Counsel with M/s. S.Rath, B.K.Jena, & J.P.Parida For Respondents : Mr. R.K.Mohapatra, G.A. (for Res.1 to4) For Intervenors : M/s. P.K.Rath & K.P.Mishra PRESENT: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing: 16.09.2014 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.: Date of judgment: 24.09.2014 The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.10475 of 2014 being the appellant has filed this appeal challenging the judgment dated 27.08.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition and directing to declare the result of No Confidence Motion..2. The factual matrix of the case in hand is that the appellant being the pet...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.14696 of 2009 In the matter of an application under Articles 226, 227 of the Constitution of India. -------M/s. Patitapabana Bastralaya, Proprietor Sri Debendra Mohapatra, aged about 47 years, S/o. Narasingha Mohapatra, Main Road, Pipili, Puri Petitioner -VersusThe Sales Tax Officer, (Head of the audit team), Puri Circle, Puri and others Opp. Parties For Petitioner : Mr. B. Panda, Sr. Advocate, B.B. Sahu & S.C. Nanda For Opp. Parties : Mr. R.P.Kar, Standing Counsel (O.Ps.-Sales Tax Dept.) ---------P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.N.MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment: 24.09.2014 B.N. Mahapatra, J.The present writ petition has been filed inter alia challenging validity of the order of assessment dated 06.07.2009 (Annexure-4) passed under Section 9C of the Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999 (for short, OET Act.) for the period 01.04.2005 to 13.05.2009. 2 2. Though several prayers as well as grounds have been...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
,ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK W.P.(Crl.) No.1684 of 2013 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. -------------Nari @ Narasingh Mohanty, S/o. Magi Mohanty, AT: Bada Sahi Huma: Ganjam ...Petitioner -VersusUnion of India & others ...Opposite Parties For petitioner : M/s. D.R.Mohapatra, A.Pasayat & D.Samantray For Opp. Parties : Mr. A.K. Bose, Asst. Solicitor General of India (For O.P.1-Union of India) Mr. M.S. Sahoo Addl. Standing Counsel (For O.Ps. 2 to 6-State) -----------P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment: 22.09.2014 B.N. Mahapatra, J.The present Writ Petition seeking issue of a writ of Habeas Corpus has been filed by the petitioner-Nari @ Narasingh Mohanty challenging the legality of the order of his detention dated 15.11.2013 passed by the District Magistrate, Ganjam under Section 3(2) of the 2 National Security Act, 1980 on the ground that such order as well...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK. GOVERNMENT APPEAL No.19 OF 2002 From an order dated 29.04.1998 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhadrak in S.T. Case No.23/80 of 1996. -------------------State of Orissa .... -Versus.. Sk. Himat and others Appellant Respondents For Appellant: - Mr. Sk. Zafarulla, Addl. Standing Counsel For Respondents: - Mr. M.A. Alli (For Respondents 2, 4 and5) Mr. B.K. Ragada (For Respondent no.1 & Amicus Curiae for Respondent No.3) ------------P R E S E N T :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINo.PRASAD AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing-15.09.2014 : Date of Judgment-22.09.2014 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------S.K.SAHOO, J.The respondents Sk. Himat, Taslima Bibi, Noorjan Bibi, Sk. Das Mahammad and Sk. Roj Mahammad faced trial under section 498(A)/34 I.P.C. and section 302/34 I.P.C. in the court of learned Ad...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. W.A. No.30 of 2014 From the order and judgment 02.12.2013 and 18.12.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.18138 of 2013. Dr. (Smt.) Geetanjali Panda . Appellant Versus Dr. Pranaya Ballari Mohanty & others . Respondents For Appellant : Mr. K.K.Swain, Advocate For Respondents : Mr.Sameer Ku. Das, Advocate (R-1) P R E S E N T: THE HONBLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH Date of hearing: 10.09.2014 Date of Judgment: 19.09.2014 ____________________________________________________________________ Dr. A.K. Rath, J.The appellant has prayed, inter alia, to quash the order and judgment dated 02.12.2003 and 18.12.2013 respectively passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.18138 of 2013. By order dated 02.12.2013, the learned Single Judge dismissed the application filed by the appellant for addition of the party and eventually allowed the writ petition filed by respondent no.1 by judgment dated 18.12.2013.2. Though ...
Tag this Judgment!