Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK SECOND APPEAL NO.53 OF 1996 From the judgment and decree dated 2.12.1995 and 16.12.1995 respectively passed by Shri G.C. Mohanty, District Judge, Dhenkanal-Angul, Dhenkanal in Title Appeal No.52 of 1991 reversing the judgment and decree dated 4.10.1991 and 4.11.1991 respectively passed by Shri Anjan Kumar Das, Subordinate Judge, Talcher in T.M.S. No.6 of 1986. __________ Malika Rout & others Appellants Versus Gani Khan and others For Appellants : For Respondents : Respondents M/s. A. Mukherji, R.K. Dash, U.K. Samal, S.Swain, N.K. Sahoo, D.R. Swain, D.P. Dash & B. Swain M/s. S.P. Misra, S.K. Misra, S. Misra, S. Nanda & S.S. Satapathy PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHUBIR DASH Date of hearing : 28.3.2014 Date of judgment : 21.04.2014 R. DASH, J.This Second Appeal is against the judgment and decree dated 2.12.1995 and 16.12.1995, respectively, passed by the learned District Judge, Dhenkanal-Angul, Dhenkanal in Title Appeal No.52 of 1991 reversing the j...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK RSA NO.323 OF 2005 From the judgment and decree dated 16.3.2004 and 3.4.2004 respectively, passed by the learned District Judge, Koraput, Jeypore in T.A. No.07 of 2002 reversing the ex parte judgment and decree dated 8.3.2002 and 27.3.2002 respectively, passed by the learned Civil Judge, (Junior Division), Jeypore in T.S. No.21 of 2001. __________ Chief Engineer, Upper Kolab Project, Kolab Nagar. Appellant Versus Sri Dhanu Khora For Appellant : For Respondent : Respondent Addl. Standing Counsel. M/s. A.K. Mohapatra(1), B.P. Rath PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. DASH DATE OF HEARING:-02.04.2014 DATE OF JUDGMENT :21.04.2014 This second appeal is in challenge of the judgment and decree dated 16.3.2004 and 3.4.2004, respectively, passed by the learned District Judge, Koraput, Jeypore in T.A. No.7 of 2002 reversing the ex parte judgment and decree dated 8.3.2002 and 27.3.2002 respectively, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jeypore in T.S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
WP(C) NO.6275 of 2012 07 29.03.2014 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition has been filed challenging the letters dated 19.12.2011 (Annexure-1) and 15.02.2012 (Annexure-2).issued by the Area Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, intimating the petitioner that he has been found ineligible for appointment as LPG distributor under Rajiv Gandhi LPG Vitrak (RGGLV. for short).for Karabar location in Nayagarh district, inspite of the fact that the petitioner fulfils all the eligibility criteria. The brief facts of the case is that the Indian Oil Corporation LTD.published advertisement in various news papers inviting applications for appointment of RGGLV distributors at various locations in the State of Orissa. The petitioner submitted his application for LPG distributorship under the said RGGLV scheme for Karabar location in the district of Nayagarh, in the prescribed format accompanied by requisite documents. It is the grievance of the petitioner that inspite of the fac...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
WP(C) No.15534 of 2013 BEFORE HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.A.K.GOEL HONBLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH For the petitioners : For the opposite parties: 03. 27.3.2014 Mr.B.B.Mishra, Advocate Mr.R.K.Mohapatra, Government Advocate ORDER (Dr. A.K.Rath, J.) The petitioners assail the action of the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., opposite parties 3 and 4 allowing opposite party no.5 to construct a LPG godown in village Adhaincha, P.S.Balipatna in the district of Khurda. Earlier, the petitioners approached this Court in WP(C) No.4411 of 2012. By order dated 23.3.2012, this Court disposed of the writ application with a direction to the Collector, Khurda to look into the grievance made by the petitioners in the representation and dispose of the same within a period of two weeks. Pursuant to the direction of this Court, the Collector, Khurda, opposite party no.1, for establishment of a depot, conducted an enquiry and passed an elaborate order holding, inter alia, that setting up of LPG godown will ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
W.P.(C) No.13517 of 2013 05. 26.3.2014 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition has been filed praying for quashing of the letter of termination of contract dated 15.7.2013 (Annexure-18) and the letter dated 23.9.2013 imposing penalty (Annexure-20).issued by the Executive Engineer, Rural Works Division, Phulbani-opposite party no.4. The brief facts of the case is that the petitioner was awarded the contract work namely Danekabadi-Sirkabarga Road for a length of 15.00 Km under PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM-SADAK YOJANA for Construction of road & CD works and Maintenance of the same for five years.The date of commencement of the work was 12.01.2011 and the stipulated completion of contract work was 11.01.2012. date of As the petitioner could No.complete the contract work within the stipulated period, the Executive Engineer-opposite party no.4 vide letter dated 15.7.2013 (Annexure-18).intimated the petitioner regarding termination of the contract work and requesting the petitioner ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK In the matter of applications under Section 114 read with Order XLVII, Rule1 C.P.C. for review of judgment dated 22.02.2012 passed in W.P.(C) No.13185 of 2006. -------RVWPET No.224 of 2012 Sanjaya Das Petitioner Versus State of Odisha and others For Petitioner Opp. Parties : For Opp. Parties : Mr.Y.Das, Senior Advocate Mr.Sandeep Parida (2) Addl. Government Advocate (for O.Ps. 1 and2) M/s Prasant Ku. Mohanty & M.K.Panda (for O.P. No.3) RVWEPT No.332 of 2012 State of Odisha and another Petitioner Versus Sanjay Das and another For Petitioner Opp. Parties : For Opp. Parties : Addl. Standing Counsel M/s Nirmal Ch. Mohanty & P.Ranjan (for O.P. No.1) RVWEPT No.7 of 2013 Cuttack Development Authority Petitioner Versus Sanjay Das and others For Petitioner Opp. Parties : For Opp. Parties : M/s Prasant Ku. Mohanty & M.K.Panda ----------- 2 P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE I. MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.N.MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment: 26.0...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK In the matter of applications under Section 114 read with Order XLVII, Rule1 C.P.C. for review of judgment dated 22.02.2012 passed in W.P.(C) No.13185 of 2006. -------RVWPET No.224 of 2012 Sanjaya Das Petitioner Versus State of Odisha and others For Petitioner Opp. Parties : For Opp. Parties : Mr.Y.Das, Senior Advocate Mr.Sandeep Parida (2) Addl. Government Advocate (for O.Ps. 1 and2) M/s Prasant Ku. Mohanty & M.K.Panda (for O.P. No.3) RVWEPT No.332 of 2012 State of Odisha and another Petitioner Versus Sanjay Das and another For Petitioner Opp. Parties : For Opp. Parties : Addl. Standing Counsel M/s Nirmal Ch. Mohanty & P.Ranjan (for O.P. No.1) RVWEPT No.7 of 2013 Cuttack Development Authority Petitioner Versus Sanjay Das and others For Petitioner Opp. Parties : For Opp. Parties : M/s Prasant Ku. Mohanty & M.K.Panda ----------- 2 P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE I. MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.N.MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment: 26.0...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK In the matter of applications under Section 114 read with Order XLVII, Rule1 C.P.C. for review of judgment dated 22.02.2012 passed in W.P.(C) No.13185 of 2006. -------RVWPET No.224 of 2012 Sanjaya Das Petitioner Versus State of Odisha and others For Petitioner Opp. Parties : For Opp. Parties : Mr.Y.Das, Senior Advocate Mr.Sandeep Parida (2) Addl. Government Advocate (for O.Ps. 1 and2) M/s Prasant Ku. Mohanty & M.K.Panda (for O.P. No.3) RVWEPT No.332 of 2012 State of Odisha and another Petitioner Versus Sanjay Das and another For Petitioner Opp. Parties : For Opp. Parties : Addl. Standing Counsel M/s Nirmal Ch. Mohanty & P.Ranjan (for O.P. No.1) RVWEPT No.7 of 2013 Cuttack Development Authority Petitioner Versus Sanjay Das and others For Petitioner Opp. Parties : For Opp. Parties : M/s Prasant Ku. Mohanty & M.K.Panda ----------- 2 P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE I. MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.N.MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment: 26.0...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK JAIL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.07 OF 2004 From the judgment dated 20.10.2003 passed by Shri B.C.Rath, C.J.M.Assistant Sessions Judge, Nabarangpur in C.T. No.39 of 2002. Sukhchand Adhikari Appellant Versus. State of Orissa For Appellant : For Respondent : Respondent Mr.Sarat Chandra Panda. Mr. S.K.Nayak Addl. Government Advocate. PRESENT : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.DASH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing : 14.02.2014 : Date of judgment: 25.02.2014 This jail criminal appeal has been preferred by the convict challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned C.J.M.-Cum-Assistant Sessions Judge, Nabarangpur in S.T. Case no.39 of 2002. By the impugned judgment the appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 398 of IPC and Section 9(B)(3)(A) of the Explosive Act and sentence to under go rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7 years with payment of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
W.P.(C) No.16248 of 2013 Present : 06. 21.02.2014 Mr.B.Routray, Sr.Adv.for the petitioner. Mr.R.K.Mohapatra, Govt. Advocate for opp. parties This petition seeks direction to disbuRs.the Incentive Allowance to the petitioner within a reasonable time. According to the averments in the writ petition, the OPWD Code provides for payment of incentives on timely completion of the work. In spite of early completion of the work in question by the petitioner, the said incentive was No.given as per provisions of OPWD Code, thereby violating the policy of the Government of Odisha. According to the petitioner, the Chief Engineeropposite party No.2 has been delaying the matter. On 06.09.2013, this Court directed the Chief Engineer-O.P.No.2 to take decision in the matter within two weeks. Thereafter on 29.11.2013 statement was made by the learned Addl. Government Advocate that the decision in terms of the order dated 6.9.2013 shall be taken before the next date. Again on 7.2.2014, on the request of t...
Tag this Judgment!