Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 section 19 power to make rules Page 80 of about 795 results (0.441 seconds)

Rice Vs. Cayetano

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of cases, congress may fulfill its treaty obligations and its responsibilities to the indian tribes by enacting legislation dedicated to their circumstances and needs. see washington v. washington state commercial passenger fishing vessel assn., 443 u. s. 658 , 673, n. 20 (1979) (treaties securing preferential fishing rights); united states v. antelope, 430 u. s. 641 , 645-647 (1977) (exclusive federal jurisdiction ..... was one, however, with its own identity, its own cohesive forces, its own history. in the years after cook's voyage many expeditions would follow. a few members of the ships' companies remained on 501 the islands, some as authorized advisers, others as deserters. their intermarriage with the inhabitants of hawaii was not infrequent. in 1810, the islands were united as .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Suman Tea and Plywood Industries (P) Lt ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1997)140CTR(Cal)454

..... of years that the route permits acquired some value because of various factors, namely, development of roads, passenger traffic, frequency of buses, etc. the value of the permit could not be evaluated as on the date of acquisition. in such circumstances, the consideration in terms of money is realised on its transfer could not be ..... miscellaneous application. the word 'spontaneous' means unaided; voluntary; growing naturally without cultivation; occurring without external cause; which presupposes, there was neither any cost of acquisition nor any cost of growing. this aspect of the matter was accepted by the ao despite the deed of purchase of the year 1978 being in the record ..... it then added that the tribunal was influenced by the fact that ao while taxing the receipt as capital gain, did not attribute anything towards cost of acquisition and, therefore, on the basis of material on record, the tribunal held that the assessee by selling trees realised capital and, therefore, receipt was of .....

Sat Parkash Yadav Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. h March, 2014 Pronounced on:13. h May, 2014 + CRL. A. 282/1998 SAT PARKASH YADAV Through ..... Appellant Mr. S.P. Singh Chaudhary, Advocate. Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.1. Appellant Sat Parkash Yadav impugns the judgment dated 07.03.1998 and the order on sentence dated 10.03.1998 whereby he was convicted for the offences punishable under Section 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC for short) for committing murder of his daughter Ruchi, aged about eight years and for destruction of the evidence with the intention of screening himself from the legal punishment. He was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- or in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. He was f...

Chandrakant Jha and Another Vs. State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi and Anot ...

Court : Delhi

..... public transport with carton/bag containing headless torso or amputated arms, legs etc. the motorized cycle rickshaw in question is not one which is used to carry passengers but is used for transporting goods. recovery of the motorised cycle rickshaw, an unusual contraption, which was seized vide seizure memo exhibit pw-44/a, would be covered under section 27 of the ..... of the motorized rickshaw affirms that the headless torso and the body parts were transported in the said rickshaw, used for carrying goods. (rickshaw not being a passenger rickshaw.) (xv) the leads and clues given by chandrakant jha would be admissible under section 8 of the evidence act, for these were material and of consequence as this had led to the .....

TaskinuddIn and ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... law remedy.7. it is true that the cases which came up before the supreme court related to custodial death, death of school children on a picnic, death of a passenger in a train as a result of the inaction on the part of the railway employees. in all these cases it could be said that the victims were under some .....