Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 section 19 power to make rules Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 8 results (0.160 seconds)

Tarun Bhandari Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2006)143PLR719

Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.1. The challenge in this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is to 'no confidence motion' moved against the petitioner by the Municipal Councillors of Municipal Council, Panchkula.2. Undisputedly, the petitioner was duly elected as President of the Municipal Council, Panchkula. As per averments made in the petition, the Municipal Council, Panchkula consists of 33 members. A no-confidence motion was moved against the petitioner. A meeting was held on 19.10.2005 which was presided over by the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Panchkula for consideration of no-confidence motion and which, accordance to the petitioner, was attended by 17 councillors. Out of them, 13 councillors who were also amongst those moving the no-confidence motion, expressed their desire in writing to the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Panchkula to withdraw the no-confidence motion. Accordingly the minutes of the meeting, a copy where of has been attached as Annexure...

State of Haryana Vs. Rai Sahib and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1993CriLJ636; (1992)101PLR693

..... advocate of bathinda29.9. 199 1/ 1.10.1991district barassociation, amritsar.to condemn reversionpolicy in view of the city bandh call.24.9.1991bar association, ajnalato condemn the killingof bus passengers.3.10.1991 4.10.19915.10.1991district barassociation, amritsarto condemn central govt.for implementation of mandal report.7.10.1991 8.10.19919.10.1991-do-in protest against ..... .11.1991bar association, batala.reasons not mentioned.8.10.1991-do-in protest against bombblast at tarn taran.9.10.1991 16.10.1991bar association,pathan-kot.to protest againstkilling passengers at ludhiana.18.10.1991 15.11.1991-do-due to sad demise ofhon'ble gurnam singh, retired judge of high court.25.12.1991- do-reasons not mentioned.12 .....

Eros City Developers Private Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)150PLR492

..... promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation would apply to the present case, especially when it is at the instance of the director, tourism, haryana, that the acquisition proceedings have been initiated when he wrote letter dated 26.5.2003 to the deputy commissioner, faridabad, in that regard. it was incumbent upon the director ..... on buildings and machinery. state government cannot repudiate those acts to the detriment of the petitioners. land of the petitioners had been released from the acquisition earlier and they were allowed change of the user of the land. petitioners were allowed to raise further construction on an express permission granted by the ..... systematic development of surajkund tourist complex. the objections filed by the petitioner-company under section 5a of the act were duly considered by the land acquisition collector and after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner-company and other land owners. subsequently, notification under section 7 of the act was .....

Arjan Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... for or affected by the execution of the scheme, or adjoining any street, thoroughfare, open space to be improved or formed under the scheme; (ii) the acquisition by purchase, lease, exchange or otherwise of such land or interest in land; xx xx xx section 36. preparation, publication and transmission of notice as to improvement ..... of acquiring of given person's property is impliedly necessary to enable him to bring to the notice of the concerned authority his objections against the acquisition of his property. hence such provisions as provide for notice, raising of objections and personal hearing in support of the objection would be mandatory in character ..... their view point regarding the scheme to the notice of the concerned authorities. equally essential and mandatory is the requirement of notice of the proposed scheme of acquisition to the landowners and occupiers of the land and building which are proposed to be acquired so that they may put in their objections. ....." (emphasis .....

Bhupinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1995)111PLR387

..... fixing the maximum fares which the operators may collect from their passengers. it cannot also be said that merely because a business becomes uneconomical as a consequence of a new levy, the new levy would amount to an unreasonable restriction ..... . 1296) ought to be applied in this case also. though patent injustice to the operators of the stage carriage in fixing lower returns on the tickets issued to passengers should not be encouraged, a reasonable return on investment or a reasonable rate of profits cannot be the sine qua non of the validity of the order of the government ..... lastly urged that the levy is almost confiscatory in character and the petitioners would have to close down their business as stage carriage operators. it is stated that the passenger fares were permitted to be raised by about 43 per cent just before the levy was increased in this case and it is even now open to the operators .....

Mohan Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2005)139PLR425

..... section 50 would not be available to such an accused. this will be equally true in the case where such a substance is found in the baggage of a suspect passenger.'21. the result of the above discussion is that it is obligatory upon the investigating officer to give complete offer to the suspect upon whom he proposes to conduct personal .....

Sarojini Sawhney Vs. Punjab University and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2006)142PLR175

S.S. Nijjar, J.1. With the consent of counsel for the parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at motion stage.This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking the issuance of a writ in-the nature of Certiorari quashing para 48(i) of Punjab Medical Attendance Rules, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as '1940 Rules'). The petitioner also seeks the quashing of the communications dated 29.5.2003, 12.1.2004 and 28.4.2004 (Annexures P-4, P-8 and P-10)), respectively rejecting the claim of the petitioner for reimbursement of the medical expenses in the sum of Rs. 2,13,514.25.2. Husband of the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased') retired from State Bank of India on 30.9.2000. While in service, the deceased developed the ailment known as ALM-2 (Cancer) in the year 1999. He remained under treatment at the P.G.I., Chandigarh, during the service time of the deceased, the petitioner did not claim, any r...

Present: M/S Sukhdeep Singh Sandhu and Y.K.Saxena Advocates for the Vs ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... and only thereafter the off-loading of ladies, children and injured will be made. after refueling, the hijackers agreed to off-load 27 children, ladies and injured passengers. immediately, the doors of the aircraft were closed and the hijackers directed them to take off again. he deposed that when they asked the hijackers as to where ..... prosecution is solely relying upon the retracted confessional statement (ex.pw-9/c) to prove the conspiracy for hijacking of the aircraft or of killing of the passengers. the prosecution has not led any evidence of active knowledge of the conspiracy, thus there cannot be any inference of the finding that the appellant was also ..... nepal as well as the telephonic conversations stand corroborated. such evidence is sufficient to prove the planning and execution of the conspiracy to hijack flight and to kill passengers, it the demands are not met in which the appellant abdul latif was an active participant.138. firstly, the address given by him in the beginning .....