Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 section 19 power to make rules Court: delhi Page 1 of about 45 results (0.660 seconds)

Sudesh Kumar Shukla Vs. Guru Harkrishan Public School and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... confirmed that mr. v.p. singh was handed over to the railway police at bandi kuin railway station not for consuming alcohol but for eve teasing a fellow female passenger. the medical officer who examined mr. v.p. singh at the bandi kuin railway station gave a report to the effect that "no alcohol intoxication found". consequently the ..... 5th february 2000 in which the school denied that the petitioner or any other passenger had admitted to harassing the girl students. the petitioner claims not to have been aware of the enquiry proceedings thereafter. on 3 rd may, 2000 he wrote a ..... 24th january 2000 were under duress and coercion of the principal.7. the petitioner appeared before the ic on 4th january 2000 and submitted documents including the statements of co-passengers, mr. zaffar hussain, n. hussain, shakeel ahmed and rizwan hussain and m. farhan. he also relied on a press note published in the hindustan times on .....

Bahadur Singh Etc. Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1976Delhi375

..... government had failed to appreciate the description assigned to that land in the master plan and acted mechanically and illegally in initiating and continuing the acquisition proceedings: which are fraud on power. the petitioner contends that a combined reading of sections 110 and 117 of the cantonment act, 1924 ( ..... issued notification directing the chief commissioner, delhi, to exercise the powers and discharge the functions of the central government under the provisions of the land acquisition act. after the enactment of the seventh constitution (amendment) act, 1956, delhi was designated as a union territory which under article 239(1) ..... master plan are, for local, state and central government offices and use for defense purposes; research institutions, social and cultural institutions, bus and railway passenger terminals, public utility and buildings, local municipal facilities, uses incidental to government offices and for their use. further, all uses not specifically permitted therein .....

P.S. Gill and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 16(1979)DLT266; ILR1979Delhi601; 1979RLR497

..... the land for planned development under the act. section 12 is concerned only with the planned development. if has nothing to do with acquisition of property; acquisition generally precedes development. for planned development in an area other than a development area; it is only necessary to obtain the sanction or ..... preclude development, that putting up a residential colony can be done consistenly with the provisions of the cantonment act, that the basic reason for acquisition in cases like this is to prevent private colonies from developing and to regulate the development of new colonies residential or otherwise though a statutory ..... zone g :' 'uses permitted : local state and central government offices and use for defense purposes; research institutions; social and central institutions; bus and railway passenger terminals and public utility buildings. local municipal facilities, uses incidental to government offices and for their use. parking requirements must be approved. 'use prohibited : .....

Universal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2008]87SCL51(Delhi)

..... functions if rights are affected, rules of natural justice step in. the principles settled by ridge v. baldwin (1963) 2 all er 66 are well known. thereforee, to the extent, konkan rly.corpn.ltd. v. rani construction (p) ltd. : [2002]1scr728 states that no notice need be issued to the opposite party to give him an opportunity of being heard before ..... the scope of power of the appropriate government under section 17(4) of the land acquisition act. under section 17(4) of the land acquisition act, the acquiring authority has been empowered to invoke urgency powers for acquisition of a land on a subjective satisfaction that the purpose of acquisition of the land is urgent. the apex court has held that such a decision .....

Mewa Devi and ors. Vs. Sri Kishan Das and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1983Delhi176; 23(1983)DLT148; 1983(4)DRJ161; 1983RLR73

..... act permitted land to be acquired for purposes of flood control on payment of nominal compensation while an adjoining land could be acquired for other public purposes under the land acquisition act, 1894 only on payment of adequate compensation. the court held that it was unjust discrimination between owners of land similarly situate by the mere accident of some land being ..... case of the deputy commissioner and collector, kamrup and others (supra) the 'and belonging to the respondent was sought to be acquired by the state of assam under the assam acquisition of land for floor control and prevention of erosion act, 1955 read with assam act 21 of 1960. the respondent had challenged the validity of the act on various grounds .....

Ashwani Gupta Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : I(2005)ACC361; 2006ACJ1901; 117(2005)DLT112

..... of justice.'7. it is true that the cases which came up before the supreme court related to custodial death, death of school children on a picnic, death of a passenger in a train as a result of the inaction on the part of the railway employees. in all these cases it could be said that the victims were under some .....

State Vs. Sunil Batra Alias Bobby

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1978Delhi536

..... him forgiving false evidence. the question that matters is not even whetherwe have' to act on, his evidence, which seems rather difficult to actupon, but whether the passenger's list itself should follow the namein the reservation chart or not. the entry in the reservation chartis the primary entry from which other entries are made. it is ..... the air ticket) he maintained it showed thisname 'j. jaggi'. he volunteered that his reason for saying so wasthat in case of difficulty in regard to name, the passenger would givehis correct name and that name would be entered in the passengerlist. but what was the difficulty in this case except what was contrived (even without justification) by ..... respect has been already discussed at length;it remains to discuss the evidence of o. p. (d. w. f)) ofthe indian airlines who referred to the name in the passengers list(ex. d.w. 6/a) reading 'j. jaggi.' d.w. 6 admitted that he wasdischarged from the army earlier, i.e. before he entered with indian airlines .....

N.S. JaIn Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1978Delhi327; 1978RLR442

..... had failed to do the part assigned to him because, as already discussed, there is no material to suggest that he ever undertook to play the said part. mere acquisition of a knife to buy a little time is neither here nor there. there is total lack of evidence that be ever enquired from rakesh or any one else ..... were engaged in some secret and unlawful activities'. as already discussed, there was no reason for 0m parkash to suspect anything. taxi drivers know that many atime their passengers will ask them to stop and wait for sometime and thereafter rush back to the taxi directing the driver to speed away.(88) some contradictions in 0m parkash's ..... circumstance to arouse 0m parkash's suspicion because the whole distance between delhi and charkhi dadri, for which the taxi had been hired, remained to be covered and the passengers, who had left the vehicle presumably for some momentary job, were expected to avoid all possible further waste of time. in the same context has to be construed rakesh .....

Free Legal Aid Cell Shri Sugan Chand Aggarwal Alias Bhagat Ji Vs. Govt ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR2001Delhi455; 93(2001)DLT28; 2001(60)DRJ297

..... on a highway, by persons employed in connection with a transport undertaking used by the public in a case where the loudspeaker is operated solely for making announcements to passengers or prospective passengers or to other persons to be employed;(f) by a traveling showman or land which is being used for the purposes of a pleasure fair;(g) in case of ..... system;(d) if the loudspeaker:-(i) is in or fixed to a vehicle and (ii) is operated solely for the entertainment of or for communicating with the driver or a passenger of the vehicle or, where the loudspeaker is or forms part of the horn or similar warning instrument of the vehicle, solely for giving warning to other traffic, and (iii .....

J.S. Arneja Vs. National Co-operative Consumers Federation of India Lt ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1995Delhi44; 1994(28)DRJ546

Gokal Chand Mital, C.J. (1) The petitioner who was appointed as Manager (Industries and Export) in the National Co-Operative Consumers Federation of India Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'N.C.C.F.'). joined on 22nd January, 1976. His services were terminated on 23.2.1985. The petitioner has challenged that the order terminating his services is wholly arbitrary and manifestly erroneous. (2) Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of this writ petition are recapitulated as under:- (3) The petitioner who was appointed as Manager (Industries and Export) in the 'N.C.C.F.', joined on 22nd January, 1976, in the pay-scale of Rs. 1100-1600, which was subsequently raised to Rs. 1500-2000. (4) The petitioner was promoted as Chief Manager from 19th March, 1983 in the pay- scale of Rs. 1925-2450 (since revised as Rs. 2070-2745) and has been continuing till date in the same pay-scale. The petitioner has all along been working in the Head Office. (5) The petitioner's services were terminated b...