Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 section 19 power to make rules Court: jammu and kashmir Page 1 of about 3 results (0.096 seconds)

Apr 22 1983 (HC)

Kashmir Motor Drivers Association and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) an ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1983J& K100

..... of government buses and private buses. government is a class by itself. the legislative object behind insurance of motor vehicles is to safeguard the interests of the passengers and third party sufferers on account of motor vehicle accidents. what is to be insured is the payment of minimum compensation to them due to such accidents. ..... nature. it is said to be discriminatory: firstly because whereas the increase in the rates of motor cars is only 15%, the increase in the rates of passenger buses is more than 100%; and secondly, because whereas ownersof private motor vehicles have to get theirvehicles compulsorily insured, the vehiclesowned by the government or by the ..... of claimsagainst the insurance companies in courtsof law. the same is true of i. e. v. rateswhere the increase is only nominal. thegreater the number of passengers in a vehicle, the greater is naturally the risk of itsaccident and the greater is the quantum ofcompensation to be paid on its account.the explanation tendered by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 1981 (HC)

Mian Bashir Ahmad and Etc. Vs. State of J. and K. and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... imposed are reasonable, as such an additional right not being a fundamental right at all, the question of infringement of article 19(1)(a) would not therefore, strictly arise. the acquisition of an additional right to speak in either of the houses of legislature would not lead to the enlargement of fundamental right under article 19(1)(a). once a member ..... fundamental right under article 19(1)(a) as a citizen and after the election to the house he acquires an additional right to speak therein as a member but the acquisition of such a right would not result in the enlargement of the fundamental right under article 19(1)(a). the argument of mr. sorabji was that having been disqualified from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 1985 (HC)

Mohammad HussaIn and Etc. Etc. Vs. Rahim and anr., Etc. Etc.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1987J& K48

..... and the collector's authority in respect of the same. section 27 authorises revenue officer to use such force as may be necessary in his opinion for affecting transfer or acquisition from or delivery of possession of lands under the act. section 28 specifies the rights and liabilities of the prospective owner. section 29 gives immunity to the officers under the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //