Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 section 19 power to make rules Page 79 of about 795 results (0.359 seconds)

Saenz Vs. Roe

Court : US Supreme Court

..... court today calls the first "component" of the right to travel, ante, at 500, was the entirety of this right. as chief justice taney stated in his dissent in the passenger cases, 7 how. 283 (1849): "we are all citizens of the united states; and, as members of the same community, must have the right to pass and repass through every .....

Eldred Vs. Ashcroft

Court : US Supreme Court

..... their argument in this court in gibbons v. ogden, 9 wheat., at 44-61, 141-157, the defenders of new york's grant of a 30-year monopoly on the passenger trade between new jersey and 237 in 1861, congress amended the term of patents, from a 14-year term plus opportunity for 7-year extension to a flat 17 years .....

Clark Vs. Arizona

Court : US Supreme Court

..... claim is properly presented, a party can make any argument in support of that claim; parties are not limited to the precise arguments they made below. lebron v. national railroad passenger corporation, 513 u. s. 374 , 379 (1995) (quoting yee v. escondido, 503 u. s. 519 , 534 (1992)). the claim is clear. though it seems to be obscure to this court .....

Sushil Sharma Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... on record thus clearly establishes that firearm injuries were found on the skull of the deceased. it is true that the security regulations prohibit the carriage of weapons in the passenger cabin but it was not impossible for the appellant to have flown from jaipur-mumbai-chennai carrying a revolver. there is no prohibition in carrying the revolver in checked-in .....

State of Goa, Through Police Inspector, (Vasco Police Station) Vs. Sam ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

U.V. Bakre, J. 1. Heard Mr. Rivankar, learned Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mr. Menezes, learned Amicus Curiae for the respondent. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28/06/2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge- I (Trial Judge, for short) in Sessions Case No. 10/2010/I. 3. Initially, charge sheet No.09/2009 was filed against the accused for the offence punishable under section 307 of Indian Penal Code (I.P.C., for short). The allegation was that the accused, on 01/12/2009 at 22.00 hours at House no. 202, near Pai Hospital, at Vaddem, Vasco, after latching his bed room from inside, assaulted his wife, Rupa alias Samiksha Shetye, by stabbing her in her stomach by means of a knife and caused grievous injuries to her and attempted to commit her murder. Charge was framed by the Trial Judge for the said offence punishable under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C., for short) to which the accused pleaded not guil...

Umar Khalid vs.jawaharlal Nehru University Thr Its Registrar

Court : Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 12, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7826/2016, CM No.32348/2016 UMAR KHALID Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Mr. Jawahar ........ Petitioner(s) Raja, Mr. Sourav Roy, Ms. Jahnavi Mitra and Mr. Chinmay Kanojia, Advs. versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY THR ITS REGISTRAR ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ginny J.Rautray, Ms. Kanchan Kaur Dhodhi and Ms. Anushka Ashok, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"In the facts and circumstances set out above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court be pleased to: a) issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records, quash and set aside respondents W.P.(C) No.7826/2016 Page 1 of 58 2. i) ii) Office Order No.198/CP/2016 dated 22.8.2016; Appellate Committee proceedings dated Nil, based on which Office Order No.198/CP/2016 dated 22.8.2016 came t...

Sri Guru Dattatreya Peeta Devasthana Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

W.P No.18752/2018 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021 R BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.18752 OF2018(GM-R/C) BETWEEN : SRI GURU DATTATREYA PEETA DEVASTHANA SAMVARDHANA SAMITHI DHARMASHREE, NO.91 SHANKARAPURA BENGALURU-560 004 REPRESENTED BY ITS TRUSTEE SRI. YOGISH RAJ ARUS S/O SRI. NAGARAJ ARUS AGED ABOUT45YEARS RESIDENT OF KARTHIKERE CHIKKAMAGALURU-577 101 ... PETITIONER (BY SHRI. ASHOK HARANAHALLI, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI. N. JAGADISH BALIGA, ADVOCATE) AND :1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS IN KARNATAKA MAHADESHWARA BHAVANA ALUR VENKATARAO ROAD CHAMARAJAPETE BENGALURU-560 018 W.P No.18752/2018 2 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT CHIKKAMAGALURU-577 101 4. THE TAHSILDAR CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU-577 101 5. SRI. SYED GHOUSE MOHIUDDIN SHAH KHADRI S/O...

Doshi Motors Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Reported in : (1989)29ITD551(Pune.)

..... the ito has not applied his mind on the issue, whether the fees of r,s. 12,000 were paid by the firm for the user of goodwill or acquisition of goodwill as the case might be. therefore, without applying his mind or investigating the claim in all proper perspective and with reference to the law applicable thereto, he ..... 7. the learned departmental representative, on the other hand supported the revisional order of the c1t and submitted that goodwill is an asset and therefore the fees paid for acquisition of goodwill was capital in nature. he has also filed a statement showirg the computation of goodwill for this business according 1 to which the purchase price of the ..... opinion that the decisions relied upon by the assessee were not applicable to the case of the assessee as they related to fees for user of the goodwill and not acquisition of goodwill. in other words, the cit held that the goodwill due to the retiring partner was paid in the garb of fees. consequently, he set aside the .....

M. Padmanabhan Vs. Fifth Wealth-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Reported in : (1995)54ITD701(Mad.)

..... case of cwt v. smt.anjamli khan [1991] 187 itr 345. true, in the said case the supreme court was concerned with the valuation of the right to compensation on acquisition of estates. even so, the principles laid down by the supreme court in the context of valuation of such right are equally applicable to the case before us.19. we .....

Arizona Vs. Evans

Court : US Supreme Court

..... . while being handcuffed, respondent dropped a hand-rolled cigarette that the officers determined smelled of marijuana. officers proceeded to search his car and discovered a bag of marijuana under the passenger's seat. the state charged respondent with possession of marijuana. when the police notified the justice court that they had arrested him, the justice court discovered that the arrest warrant .....