Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 section 19 power to make rules Page 7 of about 795 results (0.197 seconds)

Oct 18 2000 (SC)

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC3751; (2001)1GLR434; 2000(7)SCALE34; (2000)10SCC664; [2000]Supp4SCR94

..... sanctuary.development of fisheries: deepening of all village tanks of command which will increase their capacities, conserve water, will recharge ground water, save acquisition of costly lands for getting earth required for constructing canal banks and will reduce health hazard.facilities of sophisticated communication system in the entire command. ..... projects in india. there were certain project specific programmes for implementation on temporary basis. for the land acquired, compensation under the provisions of land acquisition act, 1894 used to be given to the project affected families. this payment in cash did not result in satisfactory resettlement of the displaced ..... independent socio-anthropological experts and non-governmental organisations. the functions of this sub-group are as follows:1. to monitor the progress of land acquisition in respect of submergence land of sardar sarovar project and indira (narmada) sagar project (isp).2. to monitor the progress of implementation of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2011 (HC)

Great Pacific Navigation (Holdings) Corporation Ltd. Vs. M. V. Tongli ...

Court : Mumbai

..... "maritime claim" means a claim arising out of one or more of the following:...... (g) any agreement relating to the carriage of goods or passengers on board the ship, whether contained in a charter party or otherwise; the learned judge has considered the case of m.v. elizabeth v. harwan investment and trading ..... such acts, but also the situation in which welfare legislations are sought to be outwitted against labour by capital, acts involving "controlling interest" issues, mergers and acquisitions amongst group companies, relationship of agency and trust requiring investigation [see. adams v. cape industries plc1] acts perpetuating illegality, cases in which "mareva injunctions" ..... shares of indian companies if they had a 60% ownership or beneficial interest in their hands. the rule was introduced to prevent large scale acquisitions or shares of indian companies by non residents causing destabilization. a person representing a group of companies sought to show their interest in the holding .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2012 (SC)

Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab Alias Abu Mujahid and Others Vs. St ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2012)9SCC1; JT2012(8)SC4; 2012(4)KCCR271(SN); 2012AIRSCW4942; AIR2012SC3565; 2012(7)SCALE553

..... after 10:45 pm on november 26, 2008. the explosion destroyed the vehicle and instantly killed its two occupants (the driver and a passenger).256. the explosion was witnessed by shyamsunder rambharat choudhary (pw-171), balkrushna ramchandra bare (pw-490) and sheldon alman (pw-491). as ..... nokia devices:1. nokia 1200, imei # 353526024049451 2. nokia 1200, imei # 353526025828739manufactured: dongguan, china manufactured: dongguan, chinadate shipped: june 28, 2008 date shipped: june 26, 2008country shipped to: pakistan country shipped to: pakistan vendor product sold to: united mobile vendor product sold to: i2 pakistan (pvt.) ltd.3. nokia 1200, ..... imei # 353526025842235 4. nokia 1200, imei # 353526025840890manufactured: dongguan, china manufactured: dongguan, china date shipped: june 26, 2008 date shipped: june 26, 2008 country shipped to: pakistan country shipped to: pakistan vendor product sold to: i2 pakistan (pvt.) ltd. vendor product sold to: i2 pakistan (pvt.) ltd.5. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 1984 (HC)

Jugaldas Amritlal Vs. Harilal Talakchand and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1986Guj88

..... incident in question, i.e. the goods of the plaintiff carried in the aforesaid truck caught fire as alleged due to the sparks of burning-coal that emitted from. passenger train no. 484 down of defendant 6-railway and perished, took place near about the aforesaid place; that the said train going from morvi to tankara started from morvi ..... when the truck of defendant 2 loaded with the goods in question was passing between sanala-virpur road on morvi-bhavnagar highway, burning coal emitted from the locomotive engine of passenger train no. 484 down going from morvi to tankara fall on the said goods, as a result of which the goods caught -fire, and perished. it is further ..... their truck between sanala and tankara. sanala is 5 miles away from morvi. he had seen the train starting from sanala railway station. it was it narrow guage local passenger train. sanala-railway station is on the left hand side while proceeding from morvi to rajkot. at that place the. railway line and the highway tar road run .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2006 (SC)

Morgan Securities and Credit Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Modi Rubber Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC683; 2007(2)AWC1683(SC); (2007)2CompLJ401(SC); (2007)146PLR442; 2006(14)SCALE267; 2006(4)SCALE267; [2007]73SCL219(SC); 2007(1)LC13(SC); 2007AIRSCW350; 2006(12)SCC642

..... , a seven judge bench of this court although did not have the occasion to deal with the question directly; but while overruling the decisions in konkan railway corporation ltd. and ors. v. mehul construction co. : air2000sc2821 and konkan railway corporation ltd. and anr. v. rani construction pvt. ltd. : [2002]1scr728 opined:.a judicial authority as such is not defined in the act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2001 (HC)

The Commander Coast Guard Region (East), Fort St. George, Chennai-9 an ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2001)1MLJ420

..... got, by the very nature of the incident, this benefit of such forewarning or foreknowledge of the likelihood of such loss or damage; the innocent, injured passenger after collision at sea is an obvious example. that damage lien holders should rank for priority, generally speaking, before the holders of contractual liens is not ..... curtailed. absent such curtailment of jurisdiction, all remedies which are available to the courts to administer justice are available to a claimant against a foreign ship and its owner found within the jurisdiction of the concerned high court. this power of the court to render justice must necessarily include the power to ..... order 42, rule 2 of the original side rules against the defendants viz., (i) the owners of the vessel of all persons interested in the vessel, (ii) nominator shipping corporation, liberia-, (iii) chairman, madras port trust, (iv) deputy port conservator. pondicherry and (v) commander, coast guard, chennai port, for the reliefs namely; (a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2008 (HC)

Mrs. Tahera Yousuf Kadri W/O Yousuf Shah Kadri and Dr. (Mrs.) Qudsia S ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(1)ALT708

..... compensation was also accepted. the order of the appellate court had also become final. under those circumstances, the acquisition proceedings having become final and the compensation determined also having become final, the high court was highly unjustified in interfering with and in quashing the notification under ..... the order was void. the net result is that extraordinary jurisdiction of the court may not be exercised in such circumstances. it is seen that the acquisition has become final and not only possession had already been taken but reference was also sought for; the award of the court under section 26 enhancing ihe ..... to divest the title which was validly vested in the state.when there is inordinate delay in filing the writ petition and when all steps taken in the acquisition proceedings have become final, the court should be loathe to quash the notifications. the high court has, no doubt, discretionary powers under article 226 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2007 (HC)

Andhra Pradesh Civil Liberties Committee Represented by Its General Se ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(5)ALT639; 2008CriLJ402

..... , the occasion to exercise the right of self-defence. at the most, they could have registered cases against the culprits, if possible, by arresting them.48. a compartment of a passenger train was set on fire by persons, claiming to be a wing of an extremist organization. about 50 persons died in it. here again, if there was any scope or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2008 (HC)

Saga Department Stores Limited a Company Duly Incorporated Under the C ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR565; 2008(6)BomCR59; (2008)110BOMLR2370

Swatanter Kumar, C.J.1. A simple but question of some legal importance falls for consideration in the present Appeal. What is the scope of judicial discretion of a Court trying a Suit on the Original Side of this Court with reference to Rules 89 to 91 and 265 of the High Court, Original Side, Rules, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules') read with Order VIII Rules 1 and 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 It is a settled canon of civil jurisprudence that wide discretion is vested with the Court and with the aid of its inherent powers Court can pass orders which may be necessary to achieve the ends of justice. The rules of procedural law are not to scuttle the rights of the parties at the threshold of the proceedings unless an indefeasible right is vested in the other side and it will cause great injustice or prejudice to that party. Exercise of such judicial discretion has to be in consonance with the settled principles of law, amongst which, it is also a settled principle o...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 1997 (HC)

Kum. Maria Eliza Marques Vs. Shri Madhukar M. Moraskar and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1998(2)ALLMR703; 1998(3)BomCR36

..... the occupation of the house owned by bhatkarby the alleged mundkar would not justify divesting the bhatkar of his or her ownership by extinguishing his or her rights and creating acquisition in favour of the alleged mundkar since such action would not be justified under article 31-a of the constitution of india; and (iii) there is no case of agrarian ..... , article 31-a saves certain laws enacted by the state which are covered under that article. it provides that notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for the acquisition by the state of any estate or of any rights therein or the extinguishment or modification of any such rights shall be deemed to be void on the ground that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //