Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 section 19 power to make rules Page 6 of about 795 results (1.104 seconds)

Binod Rao Vs. Minocher Rustom Masani

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR125

..... of the powers conferred by the said section 5(8) the central board of revenue issued instructions laying down the principles to be applied by assessing authorities in assessing foreign shipping- companies. these instructions were not followed by the income-tax officer, and in making the assessment he did not allow certain allowances to the assessees. the supreme court held that .....

Shri Rosario F. Barreto Vs. State of Goa and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1997(4)BomCR135

..... no ward of the name candatem within the limits of the village panchayat of cansaulim and there is a slight error in describing the land under acquisition, the impugned acquisition is not invalidated by reason of the alleged error in this behalf, if any. the necessary plan was drawn by the authorised officers before ..... under section 5a of the land acquisition act, 1894. the petitioner did inspect the necessary plan available in the deputy collector's office at margao before filing the said objections. the petitioner stated in ..... in the locality through the mamlatdar of mormugao on 15th january, 1988. individual notices were served on the interested parties in the various plots of land under acquisition. by letter dated 17th august, 1987 (annexure p. 2 to the petition), the petitioner filed his objections with the additional deputy collector (2) as permissible .....

Rajkumar Rajindra Singh Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1976HP82

..... is also affected by the operation of the impugned act, the collector will consider which of the proceedings he should maintain. both proceedings are essentially directed to the acquisition of the land. it is open to the collector to decide which should be preferred. that disposes of this point.35. in the writ petitions filed on behalf ..... can own, acquire properties and administer them in accordance with law. that does not mean that the property owned by them cannot be acquired. as a result of acquisition they cease to own that property. thereafter their right to administer that property ceases because it is no longer their property. article 26 does not interfere with the right ..... of the land sought to be covered by the proceedings taken under the impugned act have already been made the subject of proceedings under the land acquisition act and, therefore, the proceedings under the impugned act are invalid. it is pointed out on behalf of the respondents that wherever proceedings under the land .....

Vijay Kumar Sharma and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1990SC2072; JT1990(2)SC448; 1990(1)SCALE342; (1990)2SCC562; [1990]1SCR614

..... the concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment; and whereas for the aforesaid purposes it is considered necessary to provide for the acquisition of contract carriages and certain other categories of public service vehicles in the state and for matters incidental, ancillary or subservient thereto....section 2 contains the ..... or deterioration occurred. by the amendment of 1961, the aforesaid provisions of section 80 were changed and such a suit was made maintainable-(a) if the passenger or the animals or goods were booked from one station to another on the railway of the same railway administration, against that railway administration, (b) if ..... may determine the places at which public service vehicles may stop for a longer time than is necessary for the taking up and setting down of passengers.the high court accepted the contention of the respondents and allowed the writ petition. in appeal against the said decision, this court discussed the law relating .....

M/S. Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works and Others Vs. the State of Maharash ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... enactment, which was a subject matter of challenge before this court, being maharashtra central india spinning, weaving and manufacturing company limited, the empress mills, nagpur (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1986 came to be challenged before the apex court in the case of rashtriyamill mazdoor sangh, through its president vs. state ..... shri manohar, learned senior counsel for the petitioners, submits that protection of article 31c of the constitution of india would be available only when the acquisition is for egalitarian and noble purpose, which is aimed at social reforms, social structuring or social engineering. it is contended that protection of article 31c ..... as the operators were concerned they were mainly motivated by making huge profits and were most reluctant to go to villages or places where the passenger traffic is low or the track is difficult. this naturally caused serious inconvenience to the poor members of the community who were denied the facility .....

The Spl. Dy. Collector, L.A., Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authorit ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1993(2)ALT116

..... writ petitioners themselves to construct hotels and other tourist complexes, the availability of alternative lands and the hardship that may be caused by reason of 'acquisition, the impugned acquisition is not proper and valid. particularly, on behalf of the respondents in w.a. no. 1160/86, it is stressed that the respondent is ..... the giving of public notice is mandatory. if so, the notification issued under section 4 without complying with the said mandatory direction would be void and the land acquisition proceedings taken pursuant thereto would be equally void.'the supreme court then proceeded to say:'the court also referred to smt. somavanti v. state of punjab, : ..... was mandatory and an absolutely essential requirement. in unmistakable terms, their lordships have also held that the notification issued under section 4(1) and the acquisition proceedings taken pursuant thereto would be renderd void in case of failure to give public notice in the locality.15. no doubt, the supreme court was .....

Asoke Chowdhury and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR2007Cal176

..... a particular colour scheme in terms of rule 88b as framed whereby state government has empowered itself to fix the colour scheme for different types of passenger transport vehicles. it is contended that the word 'regulating' does not include the prohibition and as such the' state government cannot prohibit the transport ..... scheme and direct the state transport authority or the regional transport authority, as the case may be, to maintain the colour scheme for different types of passenger transport vehicles including the state carriage and the contract carriage, plying with the permit issued by the respective authorities. such colour scheme, as may be notified ..... 2005 on inserting rule 88-b in the west bengal motor vehicles rules, 1989 empowering the state government to fix different colour schemes for different types of passenger transport vehicles and challenging the notification no. 2076-wt/3m-177/ 04pt dated 27th april, 2005 issued by the principal secretary to the government of west .....

Universal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2008]87SCL51(Delhi)

..... functions if rights are affected, rules of natural justice step in. the principles settled by ridge v. baldwin (1963) 2 all er 66 are well known. thereforee, to the extent, konkan rly.corpn.ltd. v. rani construction (p) ltd. : [2002]1scr728 states that no notice need be issued to the opposite party to give him an opportunity of being heard before ..... the scope of power of the appropriate government under section 17(4) of the land acquisition act. under section 17(4) of the land acquisition act, the acquiring authority has been empowered to invoke urgency powers for acquisition of a land on a subjective satisfaction that the purpose of acquisition of the land is urgent. the apex court has held that such a decision .....

Shirish Finance and Investment (P.) Ltd. Vs. M. Sreenivasulu Reddy

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(1)BomCR419

..... nos. 2, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 companies. these shares were purchased under a negotiated arrangement from the companies under the control of vijay mallya. this acquisition, undoubtedly, took place before the 1994 regulations came into effect. defendant no. 2, airedale investment & trading (p.) ltd., also purchased 75,000 fully convertible debentures from ..... either file a petition for rectification or if there were complicated questions involved, file a suit. this was the position when the supreme court rend credits judgment in public passenger service ltd v. m.a. khadar : [1966]1scr683 . the law has undergone a significant change after the decision of the supreme court in ammonia supplies corpn ..... the courts find an attempt at concealment, they will brush away the cobweb varnish, and show the transactions in their true light. 62. in baldev krishna sahiv. shipping corpn. of india ltd. air 1987 sc 2245, a question arose as to whether the term 'officer or employee' in subsection (1) of section 630 of .....

Brijlal Kalyanji Bhate and ors. Vs. Municipal Council and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR155; 2006(5)BomCR430; 2006(6)MhLj183

..... v. project uchcha vidya sikshak sangh reported at : (2006)2scc545 he : further contends that the arguments of lapsing of reservation is also incorrect because i though land acquisition proceedings were] dropped allegedly on the ground of absence of paying capacity of respondents, the respondents had not given up the right to develop d.p. road and ..... to order dated 30.11.1976 in which it has been observed that land is already surrendered by the petitioners. he, therefore, contends that dropping of land acquisition case has got no relevance and significance. he has thereafter invited attention to provisions of bye law no. 19.2 of standard building bye laws for b ..... of municipal council. his first contention is that the reservation for d.p. road over 13610 sq. ft. from survey no. 96/3 has already lapsed and acquisition proceedings filed by municipal council were also dropped. the said land was therefore lost to municipal council. in such circumstances, petitioners nos. 1 to 3 obliged municipal .....