Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Court: chennai Page 18 of about 394 results (0.153 seconds)

Feb 07 2006 (HC)

P. Maragathamani Vs. General Manager (in-charge), Bharat Heavy Electri ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2006(1)CTC497; [2007(1)JCR283(Mad)]; (2006)1MLJ480

..... on their exercise of extraordinary power. barring thereof, there is no power to the civil court.(v) in : [1997]3scr370 s.p. subramanya shetty v. karnataka state road transport corporation, while dealing with the acquisition proceedings and the maintainability question under section 9 cpc, the supreme court would hold as follows:civil suit relating ..... court shall not be justified in entertaining this suit and giving the declaration without directing the party to avail of the remedy provided under the indian electricity act and the instructions issued by the board....9...when the provision for appeal by way of review has been provided by the statutory instructions, and the ..... .... a person who plays fraud and obtains a false certificate cannot plead estoppel. the principle of estoppel arises only when a lawful promise was made and acted upon to his detriment..... the courts would not lend assistance to perpetrate fraud on the constitution and he cannot be allowed to get the benefit of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2008 (HC)

J. Parthiban and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secretary to ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2008Mad203; (2008)3MLJ657

..... development do not gravely impair the ecology and environment. the board was further directed to incorporate the condition of allotment to obtain clearance from the karnataka state pollution control board before the land is allotted for development. the court has not issued a general direction that in all the projects the authority is duty ..... 1999) (hereinafter referred to as 'the t.n.acquisition act') for the expansion of the chennai airport. it appears that in the year 2005, the airports authority of india wanted to expand the existing chennai airport to meet the rapid development in air traffic and air transport. the airports authority of india is forced ..... an overriding effect to the provisions of the act.10. we may now refer to the relevant entries. entry 29 in list i (union list) reads as under:airways; aircraft and air navigation; provision of aerodromes; regulation and organisation of air traffic and of aerodromes; provision for aeronautical education and training and regulation of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 1963 (HC)

S.V. Natesa Mudaliar, Proprietor, S.L.N.S. Transports Vs. Sri Dhanapal ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1964Mad136

..... as amended in 1940, mainly adopts the scheme and structure of the english act, road traffic act, 1930, 20 and 21 george v, ch. 43; the present act being 1960 act, 8 and 9 elizabeth, ch. 6. the substance of the relevant portion of the law regarding control by licensing of motor vehicles in england is contained in 33 halsbury, ..... public road cannot, in any sense, be regarded as a right created by the motor vehicles act. the right exists anterior to any legislation on this subject as an incident of public rights over a highway. the state only controls and regulates it for the purpose of ensuring safety, peace, health and good morals of ..... simonds 3rd edn. pages 690 to 698. it is unnecessary in this judgment to refer to a comparison of the provisions of the english statute even though many of the provisions in ch. iv under the indian act are mainly modelled upon the provisions of the english act, road traffic act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 1972 (HC)

Karunaiananda Nadar Vs. V.S.V. Senthiappa Nadar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1973Mad477; (1973)1MLJ418

..... appellate judge varied the decree by directing the defendants to widen the distance between the gates to 10 ft. which he considered to be sufficient for the passage of wheeled traffic; and he treated the case as one of an easement of right of way. in the second appeal preferred by the plaintiff, the bombay high court relied on section ..... find out to what cases and under what circumstances section 20 can be applied so as to override section 22 of the act. simply as a matter of construction, when section 20 says that the rules in chapter iii are controlled by any contract between the dominant and servient owners relating to the servient heritage, it only means that if there is ..... the situation of the parties, or in the situation of the land to restrict the extent and mode of enjoyment of the right granted the words of the deed or act granting the right should have their full operation.' i am of opinion that the said decision of the bombay high court has to application to the facts of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 2006 (HC)

U. Angamuthu Vs. the Commissioner, Trichengode Municipality,

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2006)4MLJ517

..... further, the b-memo. charge receipts also failed to enlighten that the present town survey numbers are classified as 'government poramboke', coming under the control of the government, not under the control of the first respondent/municipality. the averments pointed out by me, as available in the affidavits of the petitioners, would disclose that all the ..... vacate the premises.14. on an earlier occasion, many of the writ petitioners and others, contending that their occupation is not, in any way, affecting the vehicular traffic, approached this court, in w.p.no. 38175 of 2005, seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider their representation, for grant of patta, ..... a road, they are not entitled to evict the encroachers under the land encroachment act. for taking steps, it is alleged in paragraph 3 of the counter that the encroachment of the land by the petitioners, has obstructed free flow of traffic and due to the encroachment, the width of the road is reduced to 23 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2008 (HC)

G. Jayakumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Chief Engineer (Planning ...

Court : Chennai

..... , interest on the capital invested, reasonable return, the volume of traffic and the period of such agreement.(3) a person referred to in sub-section (1) shall have powers to regulate and control the traffic in accordance with the provisions contained in chapter viii of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (59 of 1988) on the national highway forming subject ..... matter of such agreement for proper management thereof.section 7 of the n.h. act, as evident, empowers the central government to levy fees ..... to public in december 1998 and the bye-pass road had been completed and thrown open for the traffic purpose since 19th january, 2000.(d) union of india, in exercise of its power conferred by section 8a of the n.h. act, 1956 issued gazette notification in nos.s.o.716(e) and s.o.717(e), both .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2008 (HC)

The Management of M.R.F. Ltd., Rep. by Its Chairman and Managing Direc ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2008(2)CTC359; [2008(117)FLR751]; (2008)IILLJ162Mad; (2008)2MLJ161

..... case are clearly distinguishable. though the first respondent herein was initially employed in the state of tamil nadu, he was later transferred to the state of karnataka and men to goa. the first respondent tendered his resignation letter while working in the sale depot at goa, which was forwarded to the mumbai ..... despatched on 24.01.2003. the acceptance letter was sent to the first respondent to his goa address as well as to his permanent address at karnataka. the acceptance letter was received by him at both the addresses on 31.01.2003, as evident from the postal acknowledgments produced by the management. ..... employer' as follows:'employer' means a person owning or having charge of the business of an establishment and includes the manager, agent or other person acting in the general management or control of an establishmentunder section 2(6), the expression 'establishment' is defined as under:'establishment' means a shop, commercial establishment, restaurant, eating-house, residential .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 1980 (HC)

Hind Stone, a Partnership Firm and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1981Mad82

..... not well be expressed in wider terms, and would, in our opinion, unless the meaning of the words used is restricted or controlled by the context or by other provisions in the act, undoubtedly include the power to prohibit intoxicating liquors throughout the province or in any specified part of the province. this court has already ..... qualifications necessary for practising any profession or carrying on any occupation, trade or business, or(ii)the carrying on by the state, or .by a corporation owned or controlled by the state, of any trade, business, industry or service, whether to the exclusion, complete or partial, of citizens or otherwise.' in our opinion, article 298 ..... that the power given to the dominion parliament by section 91(2) of the british northam6rica act to make laws for the regulation of trade and commerce did not enable the dominion legislator to enact legislation to, prohibit the traffic in intoxicating liquors. we see reason to dissent from the view that a power to regulate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 1992 (HC)

Soudambika Finance Pvt. Ltd. Coimbatore and Etc. Etc. Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1993Mad190; [1995]82CompCas302(Mad)

..... registered office of business but also at the place where the foreman is carrying on business, so that the registrar in such caseswill be able to exercise proper control and supervision over the business carried on by the foreman. clause 40: clause (b) of this clause was amended by the committee since the committee was of ..... charged on loans and advances made by them; (e) the extent to which any of the activities carried on by these companies through their subsidiaries can or should be controlled; (f) the need for the imposition of a ceiling of risk assets to be acquired or loans to be granted by the companies; (g) the restrictions, if ..... government standing counsel, elaborately answered the various claims made for the petitioners by referring to the relevant provisions of the act and the rules as well as by placing heavy reliance upon the decision of a division bench of the karnataka high court in sri visalam chit fund ltd., bangalore v. union of india, : air1989kant125 . the said decision .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 1991 (HC)

Super Spinning Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and Another

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1993]199ITR832(Mad)

..... and 134 and rayon traders pvt. ltd.'s case : [1980]126itr135(mad) does not justify the said stand taken on behalf of the revenue. in the latest decision of the karnataka high court in cit v. deepchand kishanlal : [1990]183itr299(kar) and that of the calcutta high court in cit v. chloride india ltd. : [1990]186itr217(cal) , ..... powers under article 226(1), if the cause of action wholly or in part arises for the exercise of such power in relation to the territories under its control notwithstanding that the seat of such government or authority or the residence of such persons was not within that territory. there is no controversy or dispute over the ..... s case : [1980]126itr125(mad) and rayon traders pvt. ltd.'s case : [1980]126itr135(mad) did not advert to the provisions contained in section 244 of the act and that, consequently, the division bench judgments relied upon very much for the assessee require reconsideration by a larger bench. 8. i have carefully considered the submissions of learned .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //