Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Court: chennai Page 17 of about 394 results (0.082 seconds)

Aug 13 2013 (HC)

Tamil Nadu Omni Bus Owners Association Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... of floor area for contract carriages. it is stated that the concept of levy of tax on the basis of floor area is already implemented in the state of karnataka. the learned advocate general had drawn our attention to the details of number of omni buses paying tax on floor area basis and other omni buses paying tax at ..... different categories and pointed out that the classification has already been upheld by the supreme court. it was held that the amended provisions of motor vehicles taxation (amendment) act, 1998 (act no.27 of 1998) do not affect articles 14 or 19(1)(g) as well as article 301 of the constitution of india and the enhanced rate of ..... is arbitrary and unreasonable and whether state has proved the increase of tax for contract carriages as compensatory.15. as per section 2(40) of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (central act no.59 of 1988), stage carriage means a motor vehicle constructed or adopted to carry more than six passengers excluding the driver for hire or reward, at separate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 2014 (HC)

Tamilnadu Warehousing Corporation Vs. the Income Tax Officer

Court : Chennai

..... of commodities. applying the decision reported in (1999) 237 itr589(orissa state warehousing corporation and rajasthan state warehousing corporation v. commissioner of income tax), the karnataka high court held that income earned on storage, processing or facilitating marketing of commodities are different forms of activities, which are entitled for exemption and letting ..... above, would qualify for exemption under the provisions of the income tax act.16. in the decision rendered in i.t.a.nos.50-61 of 2011 dated 19.10.2011 reported in (2012) 18 taxmann.com 10 (kar.), the karnataka high court considered the income earned from letting of godowns, fumigation charges, ..... ), the karnataka high court held that the state warehousing corporation was an authority constituted by law for the marketing of commodities and the income earned from letting of godowns or warehousing for storage, processing or facilitating of marketing of commodities was exempt under section 10(29) of the income tax act. the high .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 2013 (HC)

Chitra Construction Company Vs. Addl Commissioner of Customs

Court : Chennai

..... been issued in the names of the particular persons.33. the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners had relied on the decision of the karnataka high court, in nenmal sankarlal parmer vs. assistant commissioner of income tax, (investigation) (1992) 195 itr 582.to state that the search proceedings could ..... followed the procedures contemplated under the relevant provisions of law, for ordering such searches and seizures, including the provisions contained in section 82 of the finance act, 1984, and the relevant provisions of the criminal procedure code 1973, relating to searches.130. it is not in dispute that the first respondent had issued the ..... nagar, coimbatore, and at no.357, western valley, green home, onampalayam, coimbatore, are required for a detailed investigation and initiation of proceedings, under the finance act, 1994 and therefore, they cannot be returned to the petitioners, at this stage. however, photo copies of the documents could be given to them, whenever they .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2016 (HC)

A.I. Agnel Ilangovan Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... , by construction, make up deficiencies which are there. (iii) in institute of c.a. of india v. ajit kumar iddya reported in air 2003 kant. 187, the karnataka high court held that, so far as the cardinal law of interpretation is concerned, it is settled that if the language is simple and unambiguous, it is to be read ..... according to the rules of grammar. when the language is plain and unambiguous and admits of only one meaning, no question of construction of a statute arises, for the act speaks for itself. it is a well recognized rule of construction that the meaning must be collected from the expressed intention of the legislature. (11) in inland revenue ..... be open to the courts to adopt any other hypothetical construction on the ground that such hypothetical construction is more consistent with the alleged object and policy of the act. the words used in the material provisions of the statute must be interpreted in their plain grammatical meaning and it is only when such words are capable of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2013 (HC)

AllIndia Gen Ins Obc Employees Welfare Assn Vs. United India Insurance ...

Court : Chennai

..... ) "trade union" means a trade union registered under the trade unions act, 1926 (16 of 1926);]" 17.the question whether such an unregistered union can masquerade as a trade union came to be considered by the supreme court vide judgment in b.srinivasa reddy v. karnataka urban water supply & drainage board employees' assn., reported in (2006 ..... ) 11 scc 73.(2). the following passages found in paragraphs 38 and 39 may be usefully extracted below : "38......chapter iii of the trade unions act, 1926 sets out rights and liabilities of the registered ..... checkoff facility and also complain in case of discrimination regarding employer's unfair labour practice which is set out in the fifth schedule of the i.d. act. the v schedule, part i deals with the employers' partiality towards granting of favour to any one or several trade unions and complaint about employers' sponsoring .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 2014 (HC)

Jayalakshmi Ammal Vs. Kaliaperumal

Court : Chennai

..... .s.jagannathan, (1986) 2 scc679:: air1987sc537. in case of a social benefit oriented legislation like the consumer protection act, 1986 the provisions of the act have to be construed as broadly as possible (state of karnataka vs. vishwabharathi house building co-op. society, (2003) 2 scc412 in favour of the consumer to achieve the ..... in protection (supra) - source 'shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in'. the earliest legislation bringing females into the scheme of inheritance is the hindu law of inheritance act, 1929. this act, conferred inheritance rights on three female heirs i.e. son's daughter, daughter's daughter and sister (thereby creating a limited restriction on the rule ..... of survivorship). another landmark legislation conferring ownership rights on woman was the hindu women's right to property act (xviii of ) 1937. this act brought about revolutionary changes in the hindu law of all schools, and brought changes not only in the law of coparcenary but also in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 09 2007 (HC)

V. Radhakrishnan, Vs. the Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2007(3)CTC672; (2007)4MLJ650; 2008(1)SLJ568(NULL)

..... the said decision.9. he has placed further reliance on yet another judgment of the supreme court reported in : (2006)iillj722sc in the matter of secretary, state of karnataka and ors. v. umadevi (3) and ors. and the relevant paragraph reads as under: 'one aspect needs to be clarified. there may be cases where irregular appointments ..... not yet been given effect to. the categorical finding of the tribunal that creation of posts is always within the administrative domain of the head of the department controlling the institution is agreeable; but, since the petitioners have not been confirmed for the last two decades and have been continued without job security, the matter ..... petitioners to remain as temporary employees which amounts to sheer exploitation of labour as it is envisaged from the provisions of section 2(ra) of the industrial disputes act. therefore, in the peculiar circumstances of this case, though we are seized of the principle laid down in uma devi's case in framing a scheme for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1960 (HC)

R. Sarangapani and anr. Vs. the Port Trust of Madras

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1961Mad234; (1961)1MLJ57

..... k. duraivelan and b. ramalinga reddi dissented. resolved also that mr. a. r. liddiard, shri jasjit singh or his nominee and sri u. s. a. ghaffoor, officiating traffic manager, to reexamine item (ii) in paragraph 1 above and report early what modifications are required.' the petitioner in w. p. no. 1224 of 1959 is a clearing and ..... and parliament of india and the government under the legislature of each of the states and all local or other authorities within the territory of india or under the control of the government of india. law includes any by-law, rule, regulation, notification, having the force of law ( article 13(3)). there can bo no ..... , it is permissible to go to that act for a definition of local authority. in section 3 (31) local authority is thus defined : 'local authority shall mean a municipal committee, district board, body or port commissioners or other authority legally entitled to, or entrusted by the government with, the control or management of a municipal or local fund .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 2007 (HC)

V. Anil Kumar Vs. the State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by Its Chief Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2008Mad56; (2007)6MLJ1777

..... the said case and the scope of section 25 was considered by the apex court incidentally. after agreeing with the judgment of the karnataka high court upholding the validity of the act, the supreme court considered the issue of enforceability and execution of the orders of the forums and held in paragraph no. 59 to 63 ..... the state government in accordance with the provisions of the code of criminal procedure.12. as a matter of fact, before the amendment act 62 of 2002 came into force, a question arose in state of karnataka v. viswabharathi house building co-operative society and ors. : [2003]1scr397 , as to whether a district forum is obliged to ..... transmit an order passed by it, to a civil court for execution, under section 25 of the act. the constitutional validity of the consumer protection act was actually under challenge in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 2006 (HC)

M. Ajmal Khan Vs. the Election Commission of India Rep. by Its Chief E ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2006(5)CTC21; (2007)1MLJ91

..... to public order, morality or health and also to the other provisions of part iii of the constitution. in t.m.a. pai foundation v. state of karnataka : air2003sc355 , 11 judges bench observed as follows:82. article 25 gives to all persons the freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practice and ..... power to make all necessary provisions for conducting free and fair elections. article 324 operates in areas left unoccupied by legislation and the words 'superintendence, direction and control' as well as 'conduct of all elections' are the broadest terms. the silence of statute has no exclusionary effect except where it flows from necessary implication. ..... the religious practice.17. in javed v. state of haryana : air2003sc3057 , the provisions of sections 173(1)(g) and 177(1) of haryana panchyati raj act, 1994 were challenged before the supreme court. the said provisions disqualify a person having more than two living children from holding the specified offices in panchayats. the apex .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //