Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Page 1 of about 9,649 results (0.156 seconds)

State of Karnataka Vs. Sadanand Parusharam Hosurkar

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : II(2000)ACC312; 2000CriLJ2426; 2000(2)KarLJ477

..... the centre of the road. this was the first breach of the law. secondly, what is pointed out to me is that under the provisions of the traffic control act though the original provision prohibited the carriage of more than one person on a bicycle, that by amendments carried out in the years 1986-87 to section ..... court has repeatedly issued directions to the traffic control department to enforce the lane system and stop zig-zagging on the roads but not even a little finger has been lifted. the home minister shall personally ..... been steadily increasing at the rate of about 11% per year, most of them being fatal, 870 deaths having taken place in the last two years. the traffic control department of the state government has been cheerfully watching the fun, happy that the population problem is automatically taking care of itself, which is absolutely unpardonable. this .....

V. Dhanapal Chettiar Vs. Yesodai Ammal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1979SC1745; (1980)82BOMLR435; 1979MhLJ773(SC); (1979)4SCC214; [1980]1SCR334

..... given for distinguishing hem chand's case also by erroneously pointing out the distinction between section 13(1) of the delhi and ajmer merwara rent control act, 1952 and the,bombay act. in our considered judgment bhaiya punjalal's case was not correctly decided.16. in another decision of this court in vora abbasbhai all mohamed v ..... after some decisions of this court, the preponderance of recent view in the high courts of andhra pradesh, madras, kerala, karnataka and punjab and haryana is that no notice under section 106 of the transfer of property act is necessary. these cases are utligappa etc. v. s. mohan raot minor by guardian changamrna, etc. (1971) 2 ..... high courts to make a firm departure and take the view with reference to the scheme of their respective state acts to say that a notice was not necessary. this happened in madras, andhra pradesh, kerala, karnataka and punjab & haryana. alagiriswami j. at page 635 after having made that observation with reference to bhaiya panjalat' .....

Advocates' Association Vs. the District Registrar and Registrar of Soc ...

Court : Karnataka

..... on 11-3-2006. the first respondent has also observed that the said representation shall be treated as the one under section 25 of the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 (for short, 'the act') and the proceedings adjourned to 25-2-2006 for adjudication.7. mr. jayakumar patil, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that ..... properly implement the objects of the association. bye-law 50 would deal with the general powers of the secretary which would once again subject to the supervision and control of the president and the governing council; the general secretary shall be in the overall charge of all affairs of the association. these are the only relevant ..... area. bye-law 8 would deal with admission to membership. bye-law 24 would deal with term of office and bye-law 26 would deal with management and control of the affairs of the association which would vest with the governing council.11. bye-law 19 would deal with the composition of the council, which is .....

ishmad Pasha and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR1734

..... from religious institutions, among others, requesting the government to consider giving exemption to premises belonging to religious and charitable institutions from the purview of the karnataka rent control act, 1961, on the ground that the institutions are not in a position to enhance rents and evict tenants and that even when the buildings are ..... 96, 2960/97, 15299/97 and 16470/96 have called in question the constitutional validity of section 2(7)(bb)(iii) of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'), and the petitioner in writ petition no. 22740/ 96 has called in question the constitutional validity of section 2(7) of the ..... of religious and charitable institutions and also the institutions under the management of the karnataka state board of wakfs from the purview of the karnataka rent control act. accordingly, the bill was moved in the state legislature and the same was passed as act no. 32 of 1994 which came into effect from 18.5.1994. it .....

C.N. Ramachandra Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1997Kant181

..... that the respondent will pay rs.3500/-when he is taking possession under order of allotment. no doubt the rental that is determined under .section 8(4) of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 as per proviso is subject to fixation of a fair rent under section 14 and it has so provided under the proviso to section 8(4). the operation ..... . 3,500/- and not specifically either for premises or for fan or television etc. it became necessary for the rent controller to indicate the rental of the building and take an approximate estimate. he cannot be said to have, acted, in such acase, without jurisdiction. even if for a moment that might be an irregularity but in such a case ..... i am unable to take it as between, whether landlord himself does not bifurcate two types of charges and in the intimation only he clumsily indicates as the rental. it is open to the rent controller to do .....

Suresh V. Talaraja Vs. Gopal Pundalik Koparge

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1988KAR2368; 1988(2)KarLJ296

..... the resultant position is that a revision under section 115 cpc is maintainable against a revisional order of the district judge under section 50 of the karnataka rent control act. in this case, the order challenged is an order of allowing review petition by the district judge.2. an order granting review application under rule ..... court fee.the question that needs consideration is whether the district judge, a revisional authority under section 50 of the rent control act, can review his order3. there is no specific power of review under the karnataka rent control act; but in j. nandanlal v. narayanswamy, : air1975kant237 , mr. dmc.j. (as he then was) has held ..... .11. in addition, the court below has misapplied the ratio of the decision in uttam veranakar v. shattu laxman donkari, : ilr1986kar1162 . by karnataka ordinance no. 4 of 1983, rent control act was amended, it was published in gazette (extraordinary) on 8th february 1983. subsection (2) of section 1 of the ordinance reads 'it shall .....

Hyderabad Karnataka Education Society Vs. Registrar of Societies and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC301; JT1999(9)SC482; 1999(7)SCALE361; (2000)1SCC566; [1999]Supp5SCR161

..... court that rule 7 as well as the substituted rule 7(a) framed by the appellant-society ran counter to section 2(b) of the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the act). these rules were, therefore, struck down. an additional reason for striking down the rules, according to the high court, was the fact that ..... have a sufficient cause for not paying this amount within the prescribed period from january to end of march of that year. he may, for reasons beyond his control, might have been prevented from remitting the said amount due to his prolonged sickness or absence from the place of work for unavoidable reasons or for any other sufficient ..... it will apply if it is shown that an ordinary member, by his own volition, wilfully and consciously without any real impediment and not for reasons beyond his control, had not paid his subscription before the end of march of any given year, and consequently he would automatically cease to be a member for that year. in .....

A.S. Krishna Murthy S/O Late Srinivasan Vs. C.N. Revanna S/O C.R. Naga ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(5)KarLJ454; 2009(4)AIRKarR486; AIR2009NOC2692(D.B)

..... tiled an eviction petition in hrc. no. 974/1987 on the file of xth addl. small causes judge, bangalore under section 21(1)(h) & (j) of the karnataka rent control act, 1961. the said petition was disposed of by order dated 3.12.1998 as being not maintainable and thereafter the plaintiffs determined, the tenancy by virtue of a legal ..... . no. 974/ 1987, dated 3.12.1998, tiled by the plaintiffs herein against the defendant nos. 1 & 2 herein under section 21(1)(h) & (j) of karnataka rent control act, 1961 was held to be not maintainable m view of the decision of the supreme court reported in jt 1998 (7) sc 110 as the suit schedule premises is a ..... non-residential one fetching rent of more than rs. 500/-. therefore, the exemption under section 31 of the rent control act was applicable which ousted the jurisdiction under the rent control act, 1961 in respect of the non-residential premises where rent was more than rs. 500/-. after the said order the present suit was tiled .....

West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. Indira Rao

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR2516; 1991(2)KarLJ202

..... for? 5. whether plaintiff has a right to file the suit? 6. whether this court had jurisdiction to try this suit in view of the provisions of karnataka rent control act? 7. to what decree or order? addl: issue-1: whether the defendant proves that the plaintiff is estopped from seeking eviction? the trial court answered issue nos ..... -residential premises leased on a monthly rent of more than rs. 500/-, therefore, it was exempted from the purview of part v of the karnataka rent control act (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') and as such the plaintiff was entitled to seek a decree for possession in a court other than the court as defined in the ..... a liberal interpretation. while ordinarily substantive rights should not be held to be taken away except by express provision, or clear implication in the case of rent control act, it being a beneficial legislation the provision which confers immunity to the tenant against eviction by the landlord though prospective in form operates to take away the .....

Pushpammal Vs. Ganapathraj Kishanchand Jain

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1986KAR4188

..... debtor that eviction order was passed by a court without having any inherent jurisdiction. the order of eviction was passed by a competent court constituted under the provisions of the karnataka rent control act and that has received the final stamp by the order passed by this court in c.r.p. no. 1922/83. the executing court cannot go behind that ..... resist the execution by urging that the order of eviction had become inexecutable on account of the death of the landlady.11. the learned author sri sabhahit has stated in karnataka rent control act, third edition, 1983. on page 281 as:'note no. 14 : whether cause of action enures to the benefit of heirs and assignees: (a) heirs : the requirement of the ..... orderkulkarni, j.1. the decree-holder's wife pushpammal had filed an eviction case under section 21(1)(h) of the karnataka rent control act in h.r.c.no. 7346 of 1980 against the judgment-debtor alleging that she required the petition premises bona fide and reasonably for the use of her husband .....