Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Court: chennai Page 1 of about 394 results (0.085 seconds)

General Merchant Association Rep. by Secretary and Treasurer and Other ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2000(3)CTC565

..... favour of the petitioner allottee is governed by the provisions of thetamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act, 1960, as amended by tamil nadu act of 1973 and act 1 of 1990 or the provisions of transfer of property act, that as late as 15.7.96, the respondent corporation threatened the lessees with action for ..... to substantiate the decision taken by the public authorities, namely, the corporation of madras, the state of tamil nadu, the chennai metropolitan development authority, the traffic regulating of authorities and the transport corporations. the materials set out in the counter affidavit and as putforth by the counsel for the respondents would definitely ..... rightly contended by the corporation authorities, warrants expansion of the broadway bus terminal from muc ground to nsc bose road as the same would ease the traffic congestion in the george town area and in particular broadway and in and around high court. 67. the learned counsel for the petitioners/appellants contended .....

G. Muthu Vs. the Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2007)ILLJ9Mad; (2006)4MLJ1669

..... k.v. muthu v. angamuthuammal reported in : air1997sc628 wherein the hon'ble apex court while dealing with the definition of family under the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act, 1960 has held as in paragraphs 10 to 12 as follows:10. apprantely, it appears that the definition is conclusive as the word 'means' has been used to ..... in k. balakrishna rao and ors. v. haji abdulla sait and ors. reported in : [1980]1scr875 , while dealing with the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) amendment act,1964 in para-24 has held as follows:24. a definition clause does not necessarily in any statute apply in all possible contexts in which the word which is defined ..... . the learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that there should not be any sympathy while construing the provisions of the act. he has drawn the attention of this court to the judgment of the apex court in state of karnataka v. c. lalitha 2006 (2) l.l.n. 45 wherein, in paragraph 32. their lordships have held as .....

A.Kamarunnisa Ghori. Vs. the Chairperson Prevention of Money Launderin ...

Court : Chennai

..... relief only till the disposal of the statutory appeal under section 26. therefore, more than supporting the stand of the respondents, the judgment of the karnataka high court tends to support the view i have taken above.75. therefore, it is clear that section 8(4) cannot be understood to confer ..... varieties and farmers' rights act, 2001paragraph-22offences under the environment protection act, 1986paragraph-23offences under the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974paragraph-24offences under the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981paragraph-25offences under the suppression of unlawful acts against safety of maritime navigation and fixed platforms on continental shelf act, 200241. under paragraph 1 ..... it could be seen that the concern of the global community which led to the above resolutions, was about the illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and the huge amount of money generated from the same. the original object of the declaration of the general assembly and the .....

Tube Investments of India Limited Represented by Its Vice President, T ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(Mad)313; [2009]185TAXMAN438(Mad)

..... several other legislations of the times such as section 13 of the m.p. accommodation control act, 1961, section 11 of a.p. buildings (lease and eviction) control act, 1960, section 11(4) of bombay rents, hotels and lodging house rates control act, 1947, section 15 of delhi rent control act, 1958 and so on. thirdly, the provision suffers from ambiguity. in the absence ..... not saved by sub-article (6) of article 19 of the constitution.77. the above reasoning of the division bench decisions of the andhra pradesh high court and karnataka high court are well founded. we have no hesitation to follow the same while rejecting the challenge made by the petitioners on the above grounds.78. one other ..... .56. in : (1986) vol. 160 itr 50 (mysore kirloskar ltd. and ors. v. union of india and ors.) at page 66 a division bench of the karnataka high court has held as under:when government and parliament found that the system had led to large scale abuse by many taxpayers, we cannot say that parliament was not .....

M/s. Fraulin, Partnership Firm, rep by its Partner J. Sumitha, Chennai ...

Court : Chennai

..... for vacating and handing over vacant possession of the property within two months time. as per section 10(3)(d) of the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act where the tenancy is for a specified period agreed upon between the landlord and the tenant, the landlord shall not be entitled to apply under this sub-section before ..... in both the appeals are liable to be set aside on the ground that under section 10(3)(d) of the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act, the rent control original petition is liable to be rejected for the reason that the landlady had issued a legal notice dated 21.10.2010, much prior to the expiry ..... order holding the letting purpose to be residential'. (iv) laws (kar)-2000-12-24 [managing director, m/s.lakanpal national ltd., vs. k.m.kondappa] wherein the karnataka high court held as follows: ... 23. as stated, the description of the building stated in the eviction petition clearly indicates that the building was constructed for residential use and .....

S. Rajasekar and Another Vs. Sartaj Begum and Others

Court : Chennai

..... memorandum expressing its intent to set up the unit. under ex.p3, the business carried on by the landlords in the state of karnataka was closed. therefore, it is evident that the landlords have established their intention to start the business in the petition premises. therefore, ..... of m/s.mysore leather corporation. the registration certificate was marked as ex.p3. the business was closed by the state of karnataka under ex.p4 dated 05.01.2008. in order to start their own business in the petition property, the landlords have filed ..... : civil revision petition filed under section 25 of the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent) control act, 1960 against the order made in r.c.a.no.35 of 2011 on the file ..... the business in the petition premises and since the landlords have already taken steps for starting the business, the order of eviction by the rent control appellate authority is proper. 12. in support of his contentions, the learned counsel relied upon the following judgments: (i) 1998 (iii) .....

Gowri Spinning Mills (P.) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Provident Fund Commission ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2007)ILLJ140Mad

..... co. ltd. v. virchandbhai b. shah , the supreme court had an occasion to consider the question as to whether the application for eviction under the kar-nataka rent control act was maintainable notwithstanding the provisions of section 22 of the sica. relying on the decision in shree chamundi mopeds ltd. v. church of south india trust association , the ..... workmen.42. we may also refer to certain decisions cited by learned counsel appearing for the appellants/intervenors before us. the decision of the learned single judge of the karnataka high court in doddaballapur spinning mills p. ltd. v. r.p. f. commissioner [2006] 1 llj 835 cited by the appellants/inter-veners is contrary to ..... employer and not the employees. such an interpretation will not only leave the workmen to starve but also will lead to slavery. 39. a division bench of the karnataka high court in the case of indian plywood . v. commissioner of labour [2000] 2 lln 677, following the decision of the allahabad high court in the case .....

Cosmopolitan Club, rep. by Its Hon. Secretary Vs. the Deputy Director, ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2006(2)CTC1; (2006)IILLJ922Mad; (2006)1MLJ602

..... away the right of the esi corporation to adjudicate, determine and fix the liability of the employer under section 45a of the act and initiate recovery proceedings under section 45b of the act. the karnataka high court, taking into consideration the observations of the supreme court in so many decisions, held, that while interpreting a proviso in ..... v. esi corporation) ;(xv) : (2004)iillj577mad (the regional director, esi corporation v. chemfab alkalis (public) ltd.); and(xvi) unreported judgment of the division bench of karnataka high court in m.f.a. no. 5041 of 1999, dated 18.12.2004.10. we have heard the learned senior counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel ..... , we are of the considered opinion that the period of limitation prescribed under section 77(1-a) of the act cannot apply to an adjudication under section 45a of the act.58. the division bench of karnataka high court, as pointed out in the above observation, while not accepting the full bench decision of kerala high .....

K.R.Chandrasekaran Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... list iii (concurrent list) of schedule vii, and that the tenant can be evicted only on specific grounds enumerated under section 10 of the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act, 1960 and also considering the judgment of the supreme court in central bank of india v. state of kerala, 2009 (6) ctc 656, wherein the supreme court has ..... fundamental right."30. a constitution bench of the supreme court presided over by the hon'ble chief justice of india in k.t. plantation (p) ltd. v. state of karnataka, (2011) 9 scc 1 has analyzed the entire concept of rule of law in the context of the constitutional provisions, especially with reference to articles 14 and 19(1)( ..... . state of maharashtra, (2011) 1 scc 694; (ii) dev sharan v. state of uttar pradesh, (2011) 4 scc 769; (iii) k.t. plantation (p) ltd. v. state of karnataka,(2011) 9 scc 1; (iv) state of haryana v. mukesh kumar,(2011) 10 scc 404; (v) greater noida industrial development authority v. devendra kumar,(2011) 12 scc 375; (vi) state .....

Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. N.K. Mohamed Ali

Court : Chennai

..... b indian penal code read with clauses (37), (75), (76) and (81) of section 167 of the sea customs act, 1878 (act viii of 1878) as well as under section 5 of the imports and exports (control) act, 1947. before the commencement of the enquiry in that complaint, the 1st accused filed on august 3, 1965, the application mentioned ..... assisted the importers in their illegal activities and are morally guilty, since there is no conclusive evidence against them to hold them as persons concerned in the act of unauthorised importation, they escape on a benefit of doubt.7. despite this finding the assistant collector in his complaint referred to earlier seeks to prosecute these ..... for the assessment years 1984-85, 1985-86 and 1986-87.4. penalties were levied upon the respondent under section 271(1)(c) of the income tax act. against the orders of penalty imposed by the department, the respondent filed appeals before the income tax appellate tribunal, madras. the economic offences court has taken cognizance .....